A Study Of Augmented Reality Real-Time Guidance With In-situ Feedback
Augmented Reality Real-Time Guidance With In-situ Feedback
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Julia Santos
- Phone Number: 904-953-3280
- Email: santos.julia@mayo.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nic Dybel
- Phone Number: 904-953-4324
- Email: dybel.nicolas@mayo.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
- Recruiting
- Mayo Clinic
-
Contact:
- Riley Nichols
- Phone Number: 904-953-7783
-
Principal Investigator:
- David Sella, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Male or female, ages 18-90 years
- Patient referred to Interventional Radiology for CT-guided needle placement for ablation/biopsy.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- Patients who are unable to give informed consent themselves or through their parents.
- Patients that do not fit into the gantry of the CT scanner.
- Patients who are sensitive to radiation exposure such as pregnant women.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: LUMENA Augmented Reality Guidance
Participants will undergo clinically indicated CT-guided needle placement for ablation or biopsy with use of the LUMENA augmented reality guidance system.
|
LUMENA is an augmented reality needle guidance system that provides real-time visual guidance during CT-guided needle placement procedures.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of completing the CT-guided needle placement procedure using the LUMENA guidance system
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Feasibility will be assessed as the proportion of procedures successfully completed using the LUMENA guidance system without withdrawal of the system before completion.
The procedure will be considered feasible if more than 80% of procedures are completed using the system.
|
2 years
|
|
Safety of CT-guided needle placement using the LUMENA guidance system as assessed by adverse events
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Safety will be assessed by the occurrence of serious adverse events and total adverse events associated with the procedure.
The safety endpoint is safe needle placement in the target without any serious adverse events and total adverse events less than 10%.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of needle placement
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Needle placement accuracy will be assessed by comparing the planned target location on the planning CT image set with the actual needle tip location on the confirmatory CT image set.
Accuracy will be calculated as the three-dimensional distance between the planned target and actual needle tip location, reported in millimeters.
|
1 day
|
|
Procedure time
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Procedure time will be measured from acquisition of the initial imaging to acquisition of the final imaging and reported in minutes.
|
1 day
|
|
Number of intermediary CT/fluoroscopy images
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The number of intermediary CT/fluoroscopy images obtained during the procedure will be recorded as an indirect measure of radiation exposure.
|
1 day
|
|
Operator usability assessment of the LUMENA guidance system
Time Frame: 1 day
|
At the end of each procedure, the operator will complete a usability form that captures ease of use using a Likert scale and subjective clinical impressions of system use and utility.
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Sella, MD, Mayo Clinic
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 26-002714
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.