Effects of Two Teaching Methods on Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Medical Errors

September 12, 2026 updated by: Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

The Effect of Patient Safety Education Delivered Through Two Different Teaching Methods on Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Medical Errors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of patient safety education delivered through the Pecha Kucha method, scenario-based teaching, and traditional teaching on nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. Research Hypotheses: H1: Patient safety education delivered through the Pecha Kucha method significantly improves nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. H2: Scenario-based patient safety education significantly improves nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. H3: Nursing students who receive patient safety education through the Pecha Kucha method demonstrate significantly greater improvement in their attitudes toward medical errors than those in the control group. H4: Nursing students who receive scenario-based patient safety education demonstrate significantly greater improvement in their attitudes toward medical errors than those in the control group. H5: There is a significant difference between the Pecha Kucha method and scenario-based teaching in terms of changes in nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. This study is designed as a three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with a pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effects of two different teaching methods for patient safety education on nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: Group 1 (Pecha Kucha Group): Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the Pecha Kucha teaching method. Group 2 (Scenario-Based Learning Group): Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using a scenario-based teaching method. Group 3 (Control Group): Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the traditional lecture-based teaching method, which represents the routine educational approach.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Üsküdar
      • Istanbul, Üsküdar, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • University of Health Sciences Turkey

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a first-year student at the University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing
  • Attending the "Ethics in Nursing" course
  • Agreeing to participate in the study
  • Being 18 years of age or older
  • Not having previously taken a course on patient safety

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declining to participate in the study
  • Wishing to withdraw from the study at any stage
  • Incompletely filling out the study's data collection form.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pecha Kucha Group
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the Pecha Kucha teaching method. The intervention consists of a structured presentation format designed to promote active learning, engagement, and concise knowledge delivery.
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the Pecha Kucha teaching method. The intervention consists of a structured presentation format designed to promote active learning, engagement, and concise knowledge delivery.
Experimental: Scenario-Based Learning Group
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using a scenario-based teaching method. The intervention incorporates realistic clinical scenarios to enhance critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and decision-making related to patient safety.
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using a scenario-based teaching method. The intervention incorporates realistic clinical scenarios to enhance critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and decision-making related to patient safety.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Participants will receive patient safety education through the traditional lecture-based teaching method routinely used in the nursing curriculum.
Participants will receive patient safety education through the traditional lecture-based teaching method routinely used in the nursing curriculum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medical Error Attitude Scale (MEAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after the intervention

Participants' attitudes toward medical errors will be assessed using the Medical Error Attitude Scale (MEAS). Total scale scores will be compared among the Pecha Kucha, scenario-based learning, and control groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the educational interventions.

The instrument consists of 16 items across three subscales: Perception of Medical Errors, Approach to Medical Errors, and Causes of Medical Errors. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and the overall score ranges from 1 to 5. A mean score of 3 or higher indicates a positive attitude toward medical errors, whereas a score below 3 indicates a negative attitude. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward medical error prevention, reporting, and patient safety.

Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adult Education Satisfaction Scale (AESS)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention

Participants' satisfaction with the educational intervention will be evaluated using the Adult Education Satisfaction Scale. Total scale scores will be assessed immediately after completion of the educational intervention to determine participants' satisfaction with the teaching methods.

The scale comprises 30 items organized into six subscales and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, yielding a total score ranging from 30 to 150. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the educational intervention. The AESS evaluates participants' satisfaction with the educational program and the extent to which it achieves its intended learning objectives.

Immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Semra Aciksoz, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 24, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UHealthScience SemraAciksoz

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.