How to Prevent Post-surgery Infections (Bundle)
Evaluation of a Bundle of Actions to Prevent Skin Infections
Evaluation of the effectiveness in reducing the bacterial load on the skin of bedridden opatients through the use of two different cleaning and washing systems (swash bathing gloves vs pre-soaped sponges). The evaluation will be carried out on a daily basis and will begin on the first day after surgery for 3 consecutive days
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Since bed is recognized as a critical time for the onset of skin superinfections, the study aims to evaluate, by comparison, two different methods of managing bedridden patients using time spent for hygiene, daily skin pH measurement and samples for cilture tests
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Giorgio Oriani, Physician - Anesthetist
- Phone Number: +39335225452
- Email: giorgio.oriani@grupposandonato.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Elena Cittera
Study Locations
-
-
-
Milan, Italy
- Recruiting
- Istituto Clinico San Siro
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 18 -
- Both sexes
- ASA III with need of monitoring
- Major surgery (Hip, Knee- Shoulder-first or revision)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of consent
- Poor cooperation
- Post-operative delirium
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Swab washing group, that means we want to use a specific swab for cleaning
Evaluation of the effectiveness in reducing the bacterial load on the skin of bedridden patients . The evaluations will be carried out on a daily basis and will begin on the first day after surgery for 3 consecutive days. Evaluation is comprehensive of pH value before and after cleaning and cultural exam before and after |
The method will be the same of the swab arm. The goal is to compare the two groups looking at any differences
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Pre-soaped sponges, using an usual methods for skin cleaning
Evaluation of the effectiveness in reducing the bacterial load on the skin of bedridden patients . The evaluations will be carried out on a daily basis and will begin on the first day after surgery for 3 consecutive days. Evaluation is comprehensive of pH value before and after cleaning and cultural exam before and after |
Procedure/Surgery: Sponge group: Use of this device for skin detersion, measuring also pH test and coltural examination before and after cleaning Description: we want to compare sponge detersion in bedridden patient, looking at pH test and coltural examination before and after surgery |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of the effectiveness in reducing the bacterial load on the skin of bedridden patients through the use of two different cleaning and washing systems . Two different devices (swab vs sponge) will be compared.
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Evaluation of pH before and after cleaning activity looking at the pH skin (using a dedicated device) and coltural charge befdore and after cleaning. These tests will be done three days after surgery, and the results will be collected in an Excel file to prepare a future analysis |
18 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of time spent for cleaning and patient satisfaction using one device for three days. The device choice is depending on randomization file and the evaluator is blind of the device used
Time Frame: three days for each patient of the two groups, plus a follow up 30 days afetr surgery
|
This evaluation will be carried out on a daily frequence and will begin on the first day after surgery and for three days |
three days for each patient of the two groups, plus a follow up 30 days afetr surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Giorgio Oriani, IRCCS OGSA - Site Istituto San Siro
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Bundle to prevent infection
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
If someone will be interested in reproduce this study or proceed in this direction we surely would like to give our data
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.