Non-Contrast Versus Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Colorectal Liver Metastases
Comparative Evaluation of a Non-Contrast Abbreviated MRI Protocol and a Contrast-Enhanced MRI Protocol in Colorectal Liver Metastases
This prospective study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of a non-contrast abbreviated MRI protocol with a contrast-enhanced MRI protocol for the detection and follow-up assessment of colorectal liver metastases.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Detailed Description
Accurate detection and follow-up of colorectal liver metastases are essential for staging and treatment planning. This observational study will include patients with histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma and suspected hepatic metastases.
Each participant will undergo a non-contrast abbreviated MRI protocol followed by a contrast-enhanced MRI protocol using Gadodiamide during the same examination. Contrast-enhanced MSCT of the abdomen will serve as the reference standard. Treatment response will be assessed according to RECIST 1.1 on follow-up MRI.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mina M William, Resident
- Phone Number: 01273242181
- Email: mina.18313293@med.aun.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Patients with histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma and suspected hepatic metastases referred to the Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department at Assiut University Hospitals.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- - Histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma
- One or more hepatic focal lesions known or suspected to represent colorectal liver metastases
- Adequate image quality allowing reliable assessment of hepatic lesions
- Patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy allowing assessment of treatment response
- Patients referred for initial staging, restaging, or evaluation of treatment response
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- - Contraindications to gadolinium-based contrast administration
- Incomplete MRI examinations
- Inadequate image quality preventing reliable assessment
- Contraindications to MRI examination
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: CASE_ONLY
- Time Perspectives: PROSPECTIVE
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
Single cohort: Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases
Patients with confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma and suspected hepatic metastases who will undergo both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced MRI protocols during the same examination. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity of non-contrast MRI for detection of hepatic metastases
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Sensitivity of the non-contrast abbreviated MRI protocol for detection of hepatic metastases, using contrast-enhanced MSCT as the reference standard. |
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MRI for detection of hepatic metastases
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Sensitivity of the contrast-enhanced MRI protocol for detection of hepatic metastases, using contrast-enhanced MSCT as the reference standard. |
Baseline
|
|
Specificity of non-contrast MRI
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Specificity of the non-contrast abbreviated MRI protocol for detection of hepatic metastases. |
Baseline
|
|
Specificity of contrast-enhanced MRI
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Specificity of the contrast-enhanced MRI protocol for detection of hepatic metastases. |
Baseline
|
|
Number of hepatic lesions detected by non-contrast MRI
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Mean number of hepatic metastatic lesions detected by the non-contrast MRI protocol. |
Baseline
|
|
Number of hepatic lesions detected by contrast-enhanced MRI
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Mean number of hepatic metastatic lesions detected by the contrast-enhanced MRI protocol. |
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with partial response according to RECIST 1.1
Time Frame: At 3 months
|
Proportion of patients classified as partial response according to RECIST 1.1 on follow-up MRI. |
At 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Amr F Mourad, prof, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Assiut University Hospitals
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MRI-CRLM-Assiut-2026
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.