Powered vs Manual Toothbrush Use: Its Effect on Caries Risk in Pre-Adolescents
Powered vs Manual Toothbrush Use: Its Effect on Caries Risk in Pre-Adolescents, A Pilot Study
This pilot study aims to evaluate dental caries experience in children ages 8-12 years old through comparing the use of a powered versus manual toothbrush, while using a standardized fluoride toothpaste as the control over the course of one year.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Taylor Cezon, RDH
- Phone Number: 734-730-8533
- Email: kidscavities@umich.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- Recruiting
- University of Michigan
-
Principal Investigator:
- Margherita Fontana, DDS, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Child:
- Male OR Female, between 8 - 12 years old at baseline
- In good health (i.e., free of any medical condition that would reasonably be anticipated to interfere with study participation)
- Must allow examination of the oral cavity at baseline
- Must have at least an ICDAS 2 or higher at baseline or radiographic signs of untreated caries lesions E2 or higher, or caries experience in the last 3 years (extraction due to caries, restoration due to caries, etc.)
- Able to tolerate radiographs
- Able to brush teeth by themselves with no assistance
Parent/Legal Guardian:
- Provide written informed consent for the child and her/himself prior to participation
- Must be at least 18 years old, or an emancipated minor who provides documentation of emancipation
- Must be willing and able to participate in study activities
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Child:
- Hereditary generalized developmental dental defects such as Amelogenesis Imperfecta and Dentinogenesis Imperfecta
- Presence of pain, pulpal exposure, or signs of pulpal infection (abscess, fistula, swelling) at baseline
- Participating in the foster care system
- Demonstrated inability to comply with study protocol requirements (including radiographs or abstaining from using other oral hygiene products such as mouth rinses during the study period)
- Has removable OR fixed orthodontic appliances
- Participation (within 30 days of Baseline Visit) in any other oral hygiene clinical study
Parent/Legal Guardian:
• Demonstrated inability to comply with trial protocol requirements
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Manual Toothbrush
|
|
|
Experimental: Powered Toothbrush
|
Powered toothbrush Oral-B iO Kids Electric Toothbrush Featuring Stitch |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of new caries surfaces and number of progressed caries surfaces
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
Composite Endpoint. New caries surface defined as baseline was sound (ICDAS=0 and no filling) and follow-up was enamel or dentin decay (ICDAS≥1), filling, or extracted due to caries. Caries progression defined if baseline was enamel decay and follow-up was dentin decay, filling, or extracted due to caries. |
12 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of new caries surfaces
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
New caries surface defined as baseline was sound (ICDAS=0 and no filling) and follow-up was enamel or dentin decay (ICDAS≥1), filling, or extracted due to caries. |
12 Months
|
|
Number of new caries surfaces and number of progressed caries surfaces
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
Composite Endpoint. New caries surface defined as baseline was sound (ICDAS=0 and no filling) and follow-up was enamel or dentin decay (ICDAS≥1), filling, or extracted due to caries. Caries progression defined if baseline was enamel decay and follow-up was dentin decay, filling, or extracted due to caries. |
6 Months
|
|
Number of new caries surfaces
Time Frame: 6 Months
|
New caries surface defined as baseline was sound (ICDAS=0 and no filling) and follow-up was enamel or dentin decay (ICDAS≥1), filling, or extracted due to caries. |
6 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00295963
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Interested parties and contact the PI for potential collaboration
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.