Effects of Immersive VR, Non-Immersive VR, and 3D-Printed Models on Anatomy Learning and Cognitive Load

November 9, 2026 updated by: Ramazan KURUL, Abant Izzet Baysal University

The Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality, Non-Immersive Virtual Reality, and 3D-Printed Models on Learning Performance and Cognitive Load in Anatomy Education

Interactions with virtual content can enhance the creation and retention of knowledge. While some studies have found that learning methods involving the body-such as tactile manipulation-can lead to deeper understanding and higher achievement scores, other studies suggest that highly embodied tasks may limit the effectiveness of education by placing excessive cognitive or physical demands on learners. This study aims to compare the effects of different forms of visual representation and interaction (2D, digital 3D, physical 3D) on learning performance, presence, embodiment, and cognitive load among college students.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Merkez
      • Bolu, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye), 14100
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Health Sciences Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ramazan Kurul, Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing to participate
  • Titmus stereopsis score >40 arc/s

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous experience of bone models either in real world or virtual reality
  • History of upper extremity trauma in past 6 months
  • Total or partial eye sight lost
  • History of photosensitive epilepsy or visually triggered seizures
  • Active vestibular disorders or a history of severe VR-induced motion sickness that could interfere with participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immersive Virtual Reality

Following the theoretical lecture, participants in this group will receive anatomy training in an immersive virtual reality environment using a head-mounted display. They will actively manipulate, rotate, and examine the 3D models of the carpal bones, L2 vertebra, and sacrum to explore their anatomical structures.

All participants in the three groups will receive a 60-minute theoretical lecture on the anatomy of the carpal bones, L2 vertebra, and sacrum, supported by slides containing two-dimensional anatomical illustrations.Following the theoretical lecture, parti

Experimental: Non-Immersive Virtual Reality

Following the theoretical lecture, participants in this group will receive anatomy training in a non-immersive virtual reality environment using the same anatomy software as the immersive VR group, with the virtual environment displayed on a wall through a projector instead of a head-mounted display. They will directly manipulate, rotate, and examine the same 3D models of the carpal bones, L2 vertebra, and sacrum to explore their anatomical structures.

All participants in the three groups will receive a 60-minute theoretical lecture on the anatomy of the carpal bones, L2 vertebra, and sacrum, supported by slides containing two-dimensional anatomical illustrations. Following the theoretical lecture, participants in the non-immersive virtual reality group will use the same anatomy education application as the immersive VR group, with the virtual environment displayed on a wall using a short-throw projector. Participants will examine the anatomical structures of the carpal bones, L2 vertebra, and sacrum through direct manipulation of the projected 3D models.

Active Comparator: 3D printed model

Following the theoretical lecture, participants in this group will receive anatomy training using 3D-printed anatomical models produced from the same 3D files used in the virtual reality groups. They will directly handle, manipulate, rotate, and examine the physical models of the carpal bones, L2 vertebra, and sacrum to explore their anatomical structures through hands-on interaction.

All participants in the three groups will receive a 60-minute theoretical lecture on the anatomy of the carpal bones, L2 vertebra, and sacrum, supported by slides containing two-dimensional anatomical illustrations. Following the lecture, participants in the 3D-printed anatomical model group will examine the prominent anatomical structures of these bones for 30 minutes through direct manipulation of three-dimensional physical models.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exam Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, day 1, and 8 weeks later

To assess students' baseline knowledge of anatomical terminology and general anatomy, a general knowledge test will be administered before the pre-test, and participants will be allocated to groups based on their test scores. Learning performance will be assessed using a 20-item multiple-choice test and a five-station Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE), administered before and after the intervention. The assessments will cover bony landmarks, anatomical relationships, important anatomical structures, attachment sites, and functions.

Baseline, day 1, and 8 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cyber-Sickness Questionnaire in Virtual Reality
Time Frame: Baseline, within 30 minutes after intervention

Participants will be asked to assess post-session side effects using the Cyber-Sickness Questionnaire in Virtual Reality (CSQ-VR). The CSQ-VR is a 7-point Likert scale consisting of six questions that assess three types of cyber-sickness symptoms: Nausea, Vestibular, and Oculomotor. There are two questions for each symptom category. Participants rate the presence and intensity of each symptom on a scale ranging from "1 - none" to "7 - severe." The CSQ-VR provides a total score, which is the sum of the three subscores, with a maximum score of 42 (14 for each subscore).

Baseline, within 30 minutes after intervention
Cognitive Load Assessment
Time Frame: within 30 minutes after intervention, 8 weeks later

The Different Types of Cognitive Load Scale will be used to assess cognitive load. The scale consists of 10 items, each rated from 0 to 10. Lower scores indicate lower cognitive load, whereas higher scores indicate higher cognitive load. Each item is rated from 1 to 10, yielding a total score ranging from 10 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater reported cognitive load.

within 30 minutes after intervention, 8 weeks later
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey
Time Frame: within 30 minutes after intervention

The Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) will be used to assess changes in students' motivation to learn associated with the instructional methods employed. The original questionnaire consists of 36 items and evaluates motivation across four subscales: attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 36 to 180 for the original version and from 24 to 120 for the 24-item Turkish adaptation; higher scores indicate greater motivation.

within 30 minutes after intervention
Test Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: baseline, within 30 minutes after intervention

The Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) will be used to assess students' cognitive and emotional responses to examination-related anxiety. The inventory consists of 20 items rated on a four-point Likert scale and comprises two subscales: worry and emotionality. Total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater test anxiety.

baseline, within 30 minutes after intervention
Assessment of the Sense of Realism and Enjoyment of the Application
Time Frame: within 30 minutes after intervention

Participants will complete a feedback questionnaire evaluating the learning instruments using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely).

within 30 minutes after intervention
MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire
Time Frame: within 30 minutes after intervention

The MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ) will be used to assess participants' sense of spatial presence in virtual environments. The questionnaire consists of 64 items across eight subscales: Attention Allocation, Spatial Situation Model, Spatial Presence: Self-Location, Spatial Presence: Possible Actions, Higher Cognitive Involvement, Suspension of Disbelief, Domain-Specific Interest, and Visual Spatial Imagery. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The theoretical total score ranges from 64 to 320, while individual subscale scores range from 8 to 40. Higher scores on the spatial presence subscales indicate a stronger sense of presence in the virtual environment.

within 30 minutes after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ramazan kurul, phd, Abant Izzet Baysal University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AIBU-FTR-RK-14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

data of this study will be available after the publication of the study and will be usable upon citing the related article

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the publication of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

upon citing the related article

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.