Infection Rate With Intramedullary Interlocking Nail Versus Plate Fixation in Open Tibial Fractures

November 8, 2026 updated by: Muhammad Asif Khan, Allied Hospital Faisalabad

Infection Rate of ILN vs Plate in Open Fracture Tibia Treated With Prophylactic Antibiotic

Open fractures of the tibia are at risk of infection because the injury damages the surrounding soft tissues. This study will compare the frequency of postoperative infection in patients with Gustilo-Anderson type I and II open tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary interlocking nail (ILN) fixation or plate fixation after three days of intravenous prophylactic antibiotic therapy.

A total of 170 patients aged 18-60 years will be included and randomly allocated into two groups of 85 patients each. Group A will undergo ILN fixation, while Group B will undergo plate fixation. Patients will be monitored for signs of infection, including pain, redness, swelling, and wound discharge, during hospital stay and follow-up. The main outcome will be the presence of postoperative infection within three months of surgery.

The findings may help clinicians compare infection rates between these two fixation methods in open tibial shaft fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

170

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Muhammad Asif Asif Khan, post graduate trainee orthopa
  • Phone Number: +923012996395
  • Email: wazirkhancr768@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion Criteria

    • Patients aged 18-60 years.
    • Both genders.
    • Gustilo-Anderson type I and II open tibial shaft fractures.
    • Patients receiving three days of intravenous antibiotic therapy prior to definitive fixation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Gustilo-Anderson type III fractures.

    • Pathological fractures.
    • Polytrauma patients.
    • Patients with diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, or peripheral vascular disease.
    • Previous surgery on the affected limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1Intramedullary Interlocking Nail Fixation

Patients will undergo surgical fixation of open tibial fractures using an intramedullary interlocking nail.

Surgical fixation of open tibial fractures using an intramedullary interlocking nail.

Active Comparator: Arm 2 Plate Fixation

Patients will undergo surgical fixation of open tibial fractures using plate fixation.

Surgical fixation of open tibial fractures using plate and screw fixation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of Postoperative Infection
Time Frame: Within 3 months after surgery

Postoperative infection will be assessed by the presence of clinical signs of infection, including pain, redness, swelling, and wound discharge, with or without a positive wound culture. Infection rates will be compared between patients treated with intramedullary interlocking nail fixation and plate fixation.

Within 3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Score
Time Frame: Third postoperative day

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and compared between the two treatment groups.

Third postoperative day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 23, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 23, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 48.ERC/FMU/2025-26/366

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. The data will be kept confidential and used only for the purposes of this research study. Access to study data will be restricted to authorized members of the research team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.