Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) Along With Conventional Physical Therapy on Upper Limb Function, Strength, Range of Motion, and Spasticity in Patients With Subacute Stroke.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of IASTM (Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization) along with conventional physical therapy on function, strength, range of motion, and spasticity of the upper limb in patients with subacute stroke.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ghulam Mohiuddin Ghulam Mohiuddin, DPT, MS-PT NPT
- Phone Number: +923323817426
- Email: ghulammohiuddinrind@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nazish Rafique Dr Nazish Rafique, DPT, MS-PT NMPT
- Phone Number: 03002132436
- Email: nazish2312@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Balochistan
-
Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan
- Recruiting
- Barkat Medical and Physical-Therapy Center Hazaratown Quetta
-
Contact:
- Nazish Rafique, MSPT
- Phone Number: 03002132436
- Email: nazish.rafique@uipt.iiui.edu.pk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- First-ever stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) diagnosed via CT/MRI
- Subacute stage (2 weeks to 6 months post-stroke)
- Age 40-60 years
- Upper limb hemiparesis with Modified Ashworth Scale score 2 and 3
- MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) score ≥ 24
- Capable of follow simple verbal commands
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cognitive impairment affecting the ability to follow instructions.
- Recurrent stroke
- Presence of other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis etc.
- Recent upper limb surgery, fractures or musculoskeletal injury affecting the arm or hand.
- Fixed contracture of upper limb joints
- Severe aphasia or inability to follow commands
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension
- Serious cardiac problems or unstable cardiovascular disease
- Skin conditions, open wounds, or infections affecting upper limb
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A: IASTM + Conventional Physical Therapy
IASTM + Conventional Physical Therapy |
5-10 minutes per session applied to affected upper limb muscles (biceps brachii, brachialis, flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, thenar and hypothenar muscles) using stainless steel instruments
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B: Conventional Physical Therapy
Conventional Physical Therapy |
45-minute session.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
Moderate-good reliability (κ = 0.65-0.78). The modified Ashworth scale will be used to determine the level of spasticity in the participants. The assessment is done by bringing the patient's limb to the possible maximal extension from flexion and then flexion to extension until the point of resistance is met. Scoring is done from 0-4 (0 being normal while 4 being rigid). |
Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
It is a stroke-specific, performance-based outcome measure used to assess upper limb motor recovery following a stroke. The FMA-UE consists of 33 items evaluating reflex activity, voluntary movement within and out of synergy, wrist and hand function, and coordination/speed. Each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully), with a maximum score of 66 indicating optimal motor function. |
Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
|
Muscle Strength Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
A standardized, performance-based outcome measure assessing muscle strength on a 6-point ordinal scale (0 = no contraction to 5 = normal strength). Evaluates key upper limb muscle groups, including shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and grip bilaterally. Requires no equipment, is clinically feasible, and provides immediate interpretable results. Excellent reliability (ICC = 0.84-0.92) in stroke. |
Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
|
Goniometry
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
Good-excellent reliability (ICC = 0.90-0.98). A goniometer will be used to assess the range of motion of all joints. A goniometer can assess both active and passive ROM. |
Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Nazish Rafique, DPT, MS-PT NMPT, Ibadat International University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Shahid J, Kashif A, Shahid MK. A comprehensive review of physical therapy interventions for stroke rehabilitation: impairment-based approaches and functional goals. Brain Sciences. 2023;13(5):717. Sherin A, Ul-Haq Z, Fazid S, Shah BH, Khattak MI, Nabi F. Prevalence of stroke in Pakistan: Findings from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa integrated population health survey (KP-IPHS) 2016-17. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;36(7):1435. Baker, R. T., Nasypany, A., Seegmiller, J. G., & Baker, J. G. (2023). Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Journal of Athletic Training, 58(2), 112-125. Cheatham, S. W., Baker, R. T., & Abdenour, T. E. (2021). Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: A clinical commentary. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training, 26(4), 187-193. Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., González-Sánchez, M., & Kuisma, R. (2022). Reliability of goniometric measurements in stroke patients: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(8), 1342-1352. Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2020). Recovery from stroke: Current concepts and future perspectives. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 17-29. Harb, A., & Kishner, S. (2023). Modified Ashworth Scale. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/07/368
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.