Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) Along With Conventional Physical Therapy on Upper Limb Function, Strength, Range of Motion, and Spasticity in Patients With Subacute Stroke.

November 8, 2026 updated by: Ibadat International University, Islamabad

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of IASTM (Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization) along with conventional physical therapy on function, strength, range of motion, and spasticity of the upper limb in patients with subacute stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Nazish Rafique Dr Nazish Rafique, DPT, MS-PT NMPT
  • Phone Number: 03002132436
  • Email: nazish2312@gmail.com

Study Locations

    • Balochistan
      • Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan
        • Recruiting
        • Barkat Medical and Physical-Therapy Center Hazaratown Quetta
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First-ever stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) diagnosed via CT/MRI
  • Subacute stage (2 weeks to 6 months post-stroke)
  • Age 40-60 years
  • Upper limb hemiparesis with Modified Ashworth Scale score 2 and 3
  • MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) score ≥ 24
  • Capable of follow simple verbal commands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment affecting the ability to follow instructions.
  • Recurrent stroke
  • Presence of other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis etc.
  • Recent upper limb surgery, fractures or musculoskeletal injury affecting the arm or hand.
  • Fixed contracture of upper limb joints
  • Severe aphasia or inability to follow commands
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension
  • Serious cardiac problems or unstable cardiovascular disease
  • Skin conditions, open wounds, or infections affecting upper limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A: IASTM + Conventional Physical Therapy

IASTM + Conventional Physical Therapy

5-10 minutes per session applied to affected upper limb muscles (biceps brachii, brachialis, flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, thenar and hypothenar muscles) using stainless steel instruments

  • Technique: Multidirectional strokes at 30-60 second intervals
  • Intensity: Moderate pressure causing mild erythema without bruising
  • Frequency: 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks
  • Conservative Physical Therapy: 45-minute session including
  • Passive stretching of spastic muscles (15 min)
  • Active-assisted ROM exercises (10 min)
  • Strengthening exercises (10 min) - including isometric holds, concentric/eccentric contractions as tolerated
  • Task-oriented Training of upper limb, {Reaching activities, Grasping & releasing objects, Object manipulation tasks (stacking blocks, turning objects), Simulated ADL tasks (feeding, grooming) (10 min)}
Active Comparator: Group B: Conventional Physical Therapy

Conventional Physical Therapy

45-minute session.

  • Passive stretching of spastic muscles (15 min)
  • Active-assisted ROM exercises (10 min)
  • Strengthening exercises (10 min)-including isometric holds and concentric/eccentric contractions as tolerated
  • Task-oriented Training of upper limb, {Reaching activities, Grasping & releasing objects, Object manipulation tasks (stacking blocks, turning objects), Simulated ADL tasks (feeding, grooming)} (10 min)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week

Moderate-good reliability (κ = 0.65-0.78). The modified Ashworth scale will be used to determine the level of spasticity in the participants. The assessment is done by bringing the patient's limb to the possible maximal extension from flexion and then flexion to extension until the point of resistance is met. Scoring is done from 0-4 (0 being normal while 4 being rigid).

Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week

It is a stroke-specific, performance-based outcome measure used to assess upper limb motor recovery following a stroke. The FMA-UE consists of 33 items evaluating reflex activity, voluntary movement within and out of synergy, wrist and hand function, and coordination/speed. Each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully), with a maximum score of 66 indicating optimal motor function.

Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
Muscle Strength Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week

A standardized, performance-based outcome measure assessing muscle strength on a 6-point ordinal scale (0 = no contraction to 5 = normal strength). Evaluates key upper limb muscle groups, including shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and grip bilaterally. Requires no equipment, is clinically feasible, and provides immediate interpretable results. Excellent reliability (ICC = 0.84-0.92) in stroke.

Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week
Goniometry
Time Frame: Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week

Good-excellent reliability (ICC = 0.90-0.98). A goniometer will be used to assess the range of motion of all joints. A goniometer can assess both active and passive ROM.

Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nazish Rafique, DPT, MS-PT NMPT, Ibadat International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Shahid J, Kashif A, Shahid MK. A comprehensive review of physical therapy interventions for stroke rehabilitation: impairment-based approaches and functional goals. Brain Sciences. 2023;13(5):717. Sherin A, Ul-Haq Z, Fazid S, Shah BH, Khattak MI, Nabi F. Prevalence of stroke in Pakistan: Findings from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa integrated population health survey (KP-IPHS) 2016-17. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;36(7):1435. Baker, R. T., Nasypany, A., Seegmiller, J. G., & Baker, J. G. (2023). Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Journal of Athletic Training, 58(2), 112-125. Cheatham, S. W., Baker, R. T., & Abdenour, T. E. (2021). Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: A clinical commentary. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training, 26(4), 187-193. Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., González-Sánchez, M., & Kuisma, R. (2022). Reliability of goniometric measurements in stroke patients: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(8), 1342-1352. Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2020). Recovery from stroke: Current concepts and future perspectives. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 17-29. Harb, A., & Kishner, S. (2023). Modified Ashworth Scale. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/07/368

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.