Exisulind Versus Placebo After Surgical Removal of the Prostate

November 13, 2009 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Adjuvant Exisulind Versus Placebo for Patients at Risk for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

This is a study in which patients with prostate cancer treated by surgical removal of the prostate and considered to be at risk for prostate cancer recurrence will receive Exisulind 250 mg twice a day or placebo twice a day for two years.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

240

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Males 18 years of age or older with prostate cancer treated primarily by radical prostatectomy and randomized within 45 days after surgery may be eligible for enrollment into this protocol. Participants cannot have had hormonal therapy, cryotherapy, thermotherapy, or radiotherapy prior to entering the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Assess efficacy of drug vs placebo regarding overall rate of biochemical progression
Assess the efficacy of drug vs placebo regarding time to biochemical progression
Assess efficacy of drug vs placebo regarding overall rate of clinical progression
Assess efficacy of drug vs placebo regarding time to clinical progression
Assess efficacy of drug vs placebo regarding cancer specific survival

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bradley C. Leibovich, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 14, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2009

Last Verified

November 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Exisulind

3
Subscribe