Supplemental Oxygen Reduces Surgical Infection

December 18, 2016 updated by: d sessler, The Cleveland Clinic

Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen Reduces the Risk of Surgical Wound Infection: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial

Supplemental perioperative oxygen has been reported to halve or double the risk of surgical wound infection. We tested the hypothesis that supplemental oxygen reduces infection risk following colorectal surgery. Colorectal surgery patients (n=300) were randomly assigned to 30% or 80% FiO2 intraoperatively and 6 hours postoperatively. Wound infections were diagnosed by blinded investigators using Centers for Disease Control criteria. Baseline patient characteristics, anesthetic management, and potential confounding factors were recorded. Wound infection rates were compared with chi-square analysis. Logistic regression identified the contribution of potential confounding factors. Surgical wound infection occurred in 24.4% of patients receiving 30% oxygen, but only 14.9% of those receiving 80% oxygen (P<0.039). According to logistic regression, the relative risk of infection in patients given supplemental oxygen was 0.46 (P=0.035). Supplemental inspired oxygen reduced wound infection risk by roughly a factor of two. We thus recommend that supplemental oxygen be provided to patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Context: Supplemental perioperative oxygen has been variously reported to halve or double the risk of surgical wound infection.

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that supplemental oxygen reduces infection risk following colorectal surgery.

Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Fourteen Spanish hospitals. Patients: Three hundred patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either 30% or 80% FiO2 intraoperatively and for 6 hours after surgery. Anesthetic management and antibiotic administration were standardized.

Main outcome measures: Wound infections were diagnosed by blinded investigators using Centers for Disease Control criteria. Baseline patient characteristics, anesthetic management, and potential confounding factors were recorded. The wound infection rate in the 30% and 80% oxygen groups was compared with chi-square analysis. A logistic regression was used to identify the contribution of potential confounding factors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective colorectal resection,
  • Patients having abdominal-peritoneal reconstructions were included, but not those scheduled for minor colon surgery (e.g., polypectomy, isolated colostomy) or laparoscopic surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included expected surgery time of less than one hour, fever or existing signs of infection, diabetes mellitus (type I or II), HIV infection, weight loss exceeding 20% in the previous three months, serum albumin concentration < 30 g/L, and a leukocyte count <2500 cells/ml.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 80% perioperative oxygen
Perioperative supplemental oxygen: Patients were randomly assigned to 80% fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) intraoperatively and for 6 hours after surgery. Anesthetic treatment and antibiotic administration were standardized.
Patients were assigned to 80% fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) intraoperatively and for 6 hours after surgery. Anesthetic treatment and antibiotic administration were standardized.
Placebo Comparator: 30% perioperative oxygen
Standard oxygen: Patients were randomly assigned to 30% fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) intraoperatively and for 6 hours after surgery. Anesthetic treatment and antibiotic administration were standardized.
Patients were assigned to 30% fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) intraoperatively and for 6 hours after surgery. Anesthetic treatment and antibiotic administration were standardized.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incisional Surgical Wound Infection
Time Frame: 0 to 14 days after surgery
Surgical wounds were defined as infected if they met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions.
0 to 14 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return of Bowel Function
Time Frame: time to event after surgery to discharge from hospital
Time to return of bowel function, measured in days.
time to event after surgery to discharge from hospital
Return to Ambulation
Time Frame: time to event after surgery
time to return to ambulation after surgery, measured in days
time to event after surgery
First Solid Food Intake
Time Frame: time to event after surgery
Time to restarting feeding after surgery, measured in days.
time to event after surgery
Staples Removed
Time Frame: time to event after surgery
Time to staples removed, measured in days
time to event after surgery
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: time to hospital discharge after surgery
The number of days patient stayed in the hospital after surgery.
time to hospital discharge after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: F. Javier Belda, MD, PhD, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 10, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe