- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00242710
Study Evaluating Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens Combinations In Postmenopausal Women
October 30, 2013 updated by: Pfizer
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo- And Active-Controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Of Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens Combinations For Prevention Of Endometrial Hyperplasia And Prevention Of Osteoporosis In Postmenopausal Women
The purpose of this study is to determine whether bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens combinations are effective for the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia and for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
1083
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Upland, California, United States, 91786
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Florida
-
Inverness, Florida, United States, 34452
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Georgia
-
Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Hawaii
-
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96814
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536-0293
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Montana
-
Billings, Montana, United States, 59102
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15206
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Generally healthy, postmenopausal women, aged 40 to less than 65 years
- Intact uterus
- At least 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea, OR 6 months spontaneous amenorrhea with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels > 40 mIU/mL.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of oral estrogen-, progestin-, androgen-, or SERM-containing drug products within 8 weeks before screening (12 weeks for the osteoporosis substudy)
- A history or active presence of clinically important medical disease
- Malabsorption disorders
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
BZA 20mg/CE 0.625
|
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 2
BZA 20mg/CE 0.45
|
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm 3
CE 0.45mg/MPA1.5mg
|
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Arm 4
Placebo
|
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With Hyperplasia at Screening
Time Frame: Screening
|
Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies.
All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists.
Participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if both pathologists read hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia).
If the both pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted, with the final diagnosis determined by the majority opinion.
|
Screening
|
Percentage of Participants With Hyperplasia at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
|
Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies.
All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists.
Participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if both pathologists read hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia).
If the both pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted, with the final diagnosis determined by the majority opinion.
|
Month 12
|
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Screening
Time Frame: Screening
|
BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), twice during screening in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy.
The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan.
An average of the 2 readings was reported.
|
Screening
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 12 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy.
The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan.
An average of the 2 readings was reported.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Screening
Time Frame: Screening
|
BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by DXA, twice during screening in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy.
The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan.
An average of the 2 readings was reported.
|
Screening
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
|
BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 12 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy.
The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan.
An average of the 2 readings was reported.
|
Baseline, Month 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Days With Breast Pain
Time Frame: Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
|
Percentage of days with breast pain in each 4-week period (for example, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8) calculated as the number of days on which a participants reported breast pain divided by total number of days with data recorded multiplied by 100.
Data was collected every day after randomization up to Year 1 and was analyzed in 4 weeks intervals.
Data for screening was not analyzed since data were collected only for 7 days at screening which was not considered comparable to 4-week post-baseline data.
|
Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
|
Percentage of Participants With Uterine Bleeding or Spotting
Time Frame: Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
|
Data was collected every day after randomization up to Year 1 and was analyzed in 4 weeks intervals.
Data for screening was not analyzed since data were collected only for 7 days at screening which was not considered comparable to 4-week post-baseline data.
|
Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
|
Percentage of Participants With Hyperplasia at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
|
Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies.
All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists.
Participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if both pathologists read hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia).
If the both pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted, with the final diagnosis determined by the majority opinion.
|
Month 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 24
|
BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 24 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy.
The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan.
An average of the 2 readings was reported.
|
Baseline, Month 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 24
|
BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 24 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy.
The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan.
An average of the 2 readings was reported.
|
Baseline, Month 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
September 1, 2008
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
September 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2005
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 19, 2005
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
October 20, 2005
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
December 20, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 30, 2013
Last Verified
October 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Metabolic Diseases
- Uterine Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Bone Diseases, Metabolic
- Hyperplasia
- Endometrial Hyperplasia
- Osteoporosis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Hormone Antagonists
- Bone Density Conservation Agents
- Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators
- Estrogen Receptor Modulators
- Bazedoxifene
- Estrogens
- Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3115A1-304
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endometrial Hyperplasia
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingEndometrial Cancer and Endometrial HyperplasiaEgypt
-
CHU de ReimsUnknownEndometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial CancersFrance
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedAtypical Endometrial HyperplasiaEgypt
-
Fudan UniversityZhejiang Cancer Hospital; Shanghai 6th People's Hospital; Shanghai Changning...CompletedAtypical Endometrial HyperplasiaChina
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedEndometrial Hyperplasia Without AtypiaTurkey
-
Fudan UniversityTerminatedAtypical Endometrial HyperplasiaChina
-
West China Second University HospitalRecruitingAtypical Endometrial Hyperplasia | Endometrial CancerChina
-
Xiaojun ChenCompletedEndometrial Hyperplasia Without AtypiaChina
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompletedEndometrial Hyperplasia | Endometrial Hyperplasia Without AtypiaUnited States
-
Peking University People's HospitalPeking University; Beihang UniversityRecruitingAtypical Endometrial Hyperplasia | Endometrial Carcinoma Stage IChina
Clinical Trials on Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogen
-
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerCompletedVaginal AtrophyUnited States
-
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerCompletedStudy Evaluating Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogen Combinations in Symptoms Associated With MenopauseVasomotor Symptoms Associated With MenopauseUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillFoundation of Hope, North CarolinaCompletedDepression | Perimenopausal DisorderUnited States
-
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerCompletedPostmenopauseUnited States
-
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerCompleted
-
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerCompletedPostmenopause
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterPfizerCompletedBreast CancerUnited States
-
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerCompleted
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingBreast Cancer | Risk ReductionUnited States