Study Evaluating Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens Combinations In Postmenopausal Women

October 30, 2013 updated by: Pfizer

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo- And Active-Controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Of Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens Combinations For Prevention Of Endometrial Hyperplasia And Prevention Of Osteoporosis In Postmenopausal Women

The purpose of this study is to determine whether bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens combinations are effective for the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia and for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1083

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Upland, California, United States, 91786
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Inverness, Florida, United States, 34452
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96814
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536-0293
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Montana
      • Billings, Montana, United States, 59102
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15206
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Generally healthy, postmenopausal women, aged 40 to less than 65 years
  • Intact uterus
  • At least 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea, OR 6 months spontaneous amenorrhea with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels > 40 mIU/mL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of oral estrogen-, progestin-, androgen-, or SERM-containing drug products within 8 weeks before screening (12 weeks for the osteoporosis substudy)
  • A history or active presence of clinically important medical disease
  • Malabsorption disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
BZA 20mg/CE 0.625
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 2
BZA 20mg/CE 0.45
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm 3
CE 0.45mg/MPA1.5mg
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Arm 4
Placebo
Subjects will take 1 capsule orally, once daily, at approximately the same time each day continuously for the duration of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Hyperplasia at Screening
Time Frame: Screening
Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies. All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists. Participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if both pathologists read hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia). If the both pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted, with the final diagnosis determined by the majority opinion.
Screening
Percentage of Participants With Hyperplasia at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies. All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists. Participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if both pathologists read hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia). If the both pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted, with the final diagnosis determined by the majority opinion.
Month 12
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Screening
Time Frame: Screening
BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), twice during screening in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. An average of the 2 readings was reported.
Screening
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 12 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. An average of the 2 readings was reported.
Baseline, Month 12
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Screening
Time Frame: Screening
BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by DXA, twice during screening in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. An average of the 2 readings was reported.
Screening
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 12 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. An average of the 2 readings was reported.
Baseline, Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Days With Breast Pain
Time Frame: Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
Percentage of days with breast pain in each 4-week period (for example, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8) calculated as the number of days on which a participants reported breast pain divided by total number of days with data recorded multiplied by 100. Data was collected every day after randomization up to Year 1 and was analyzed in 4 weeks intervals. Data for screening was not analyzed since data were collected only for 7 days at screening which was not considered comparable to 4-week post-baseline data.
Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
Percentage of Participants With Uterine Bleeding or Spotting
Time Frame: Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
Data was collected every day after randomization up to Year 1 and was analyzed in 4 weeks intervals. Data for screening was not analyzed since data were collected only for 7 days at screening which was not considered comparable to 4-week post-baseline data.
Screening, Week 1 to 4, 5 to 8, 9 to 12, 13 to 16, 17 to 20, 21 to 24, 25 to 28, 29 to 32, 33 to 36, 37 to 40, 41 to 44, 45 to 48, 49 to 52
Percentage of Participants With Hyperplasia at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies. All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists. Participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if both pathologists read hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia). If the both pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted, with the final diagnosis determined by the majority opinion.
Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 24
BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 24 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. An average of the 2 readings was reported.
Baseline, Month 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 24
BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by DXA, twice at Month 24 in participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. An average of the 2 readings was reported.
Baseline, Month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 20, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 20, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Hyperplasia

Clinical Trials on Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogen

3
Subscribe