Observational Study in Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Long-Acting Risperidone Injection (RISPERDAL CONSTA) (SOURCE)

April 2, 2014 updated by: Janssen, LP

The SOURCE Study: Schizophrenia Outcomes-utilization, Relapse, and Clinical Evaluation: a Prospective 2-year Observational Study of Patients With Schizophrenia Who Initiate Treatment With Injectable Risperidone Long-acting Microspheres (RISPERDAL CONSTA)

The purpose of this study is to examine treatment practices of adult schizophrenia patients by their own doctors, and to assess patient outcomes when treated with long-acting risperidone injection over a two-year period of observation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a 2-year, prospective (a study in which the patients are identified and then followed forward in time for the outcome of the study), multi-center (at multiple sites), longitudinal (study that involves repeated observations of the same outcomes in the same people over long periods of time), observational study (study in which the investigators/ physicians observe the patients and measure their outcomes) in adults with schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by a breakdown of thought processes and by poor emotional responsiveness). Physicians will determine the appropriate treatment for their patients, according to their usual practice. Patients starting treatment with long-acting risperidone injection (an antipsychotic medication) and meeting all the study criteria will be enrolled in the study. They will receive a dose of 25, 37.5 or 50 mg of risperidone every 2 weeks by intramuscular injection, and continue their treatment for schizophrenia according to usual care by their physicians. Patients will be asked questions at baseline and every three months for a period of two years to assess: efficacy of the medication, how well the patient is functioning, use of healthcare resources (eg, emergency room visits and hospitalizations) patient work status, quality of life and patient satisfaction with the medicine. Safety will be monitored throughout the study duration of 2 years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

532

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients diagnosed with schizophrenia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients had schizophrenia (disorganized, catatonic, paranoid, residual, or undifferentiated) that met disease diagnostic criteria as defined in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV ([DSM-IV]
  • Requiring new treatment with long-acting risperidone injectable
  • Patients were cooperative, reliable, and able to complete all aspects of the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of an investigational drug in the past 30 days
  • At risk to self or others

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with schizophrenia
Long-acting injectable of risperidone given as per the prescription from the prescribing physician (Observational study).
Long-acting injectable of risperidone given as per the prescription from the prescribing physician.
Other Names:
  • RISPERDAL CONSTA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Month 0) to 24 months
The CGI-S is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 (normal, not at all ill to among the most severely ill patients), which measures disease severity in psychiatric patients. The scale is completed by physician.
Baseline (Month 0) to 24 months
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scores during 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
The CGI-C is a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 (very much improved to very much worse), which is used to rate the change in the patient's illness compared to baseline. The scale assesses the patient's improvement over time. The scale is completed by physician.
24 months
Change from baseline to 24 months in Global Assessment of Function (GAF) scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
GAF is completed by the physician. GAF is a single item rating of the patient's psychological, social, and occupational functioning on a hypothetical continuum of mental health-illness. Respondents are asked to rate the subject's lowest level of functioning in the last week. GAF scores range from 0 to 100. (0 = Inadequate information, 1 = Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others and 100 = Superior functioning in a wide range of activities).
Baseline to 24 months
Change from baseline to 24 months in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
The PSP Scale is completed by the physician. PSP is a rating of a patient's level of functioning during the past month in 4 areas: (a) socially useful activities (including work and study); (b) personal and social relationships; (c) self-care; and (d) disturbing and aggressive behaviors. Scores range from 1 to 100. (1= Lack of autonomy in basic functioning and 100 = Excellent functioning in all 4 main areas).
Baseline to 24 months
Change from baseline to 24 months in Strauss-Carpenter Levels of Function (LOF) scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
The Strauss-Carpenter LOF is completed by the physician. It consists of 9 items that can be grouped into 4 subscales: symptoms (absence of symptoms and recent hospitalizations), social contacts (frequency and quality of social contacts), work (quantity and quality of useful work), and function (ability to meet basic needs, fullness of life, and overall level of function). Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (worst functioning) to 4 (best functioning).
Baseline to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 24 months in Quality of Life Assessment: Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form (SF-36) scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
Patients completed the SF-36. The survey includes 36 items and evaluates health status in the past 4 weeks, in 8 different areas, which can be broadly summarized as physical health (physical functioning [PF], role-physical [RP], bodily pain [BP] and general health [GH]) and mental health (vitality [VT], social functioning [SF], role-emotional [RE], and mental health [MH]). In addition, the SF-36 evaluates health status in 2 broadly-defined areas, mental health and physical health. Higher scores represent better health status.
Baseline to 24 months
Change from baseline to 24 months in patient satisfaction with antipsychotic medication
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
Patients are asked a single question to evaluate patient satisfaction with their current Anti psychotic medication. The question is, "The way I feel about my current antipsychotic is:" and used a 7-point response scale from 1 to 7 (extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfy).
Baseline to 24 months
Change from baseline to 24 months in healthcare resource utilization
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
Healthcare resource utilization including dates of hospitalizations (inpatient), emergency room (ER) visits, and outpatient visits, consultations with specialists and general practitioners. Relapse rates (from psychiatric hospitalizations, suicidal behavior or homicidal behavior) are also captured as resource utilization.
Baseline to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe