Patients Preference With Self-Injection: The PRISM Study

March 9, 2009 updated by: Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

THE PRISM Study-Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation: the Patient Preference for Self-Injection Study and Related Measurements

The purpose of this study is to determine which short-acting blood thinner (low-molecular-weight heparin [Enoxaparin] or unfractionated heparin) is associated with less discomfort and bruising when given as a subcutaneous (under the skin) injection before and after a planned surgery or procedure in patients who temporarily stop warfarin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Increasing Patient Comfort and Compliance: The Bridging Anticoagulation Clinic strives to provide the highest quality of care to patients who require temporary interruption of warfarin therapy. An important component of optimizing patient care is minimizing patient discomfort with perioperative administration of short-acting anticoagulants (LWMH or UFH) used for bridging therapy, which, in turn, may optimize patient compliance with this treatment. This issue is especially relevant for patients who are receiving out-of-hospital treatment with LMWH or UFH because about 85% of such patients will be taught to self-administer this medication. This study seeks to determine if there is less discomfort and bruising associated with self-injection of LMWH than with UFH.

Minimizing Injection Site Bruising: No studies, to our knowledge, have assessed the characteristics or clinical importance of bruising in patients receiving subcutaneous LMWH or UFH. Thus, there is no evidence to support any association between bruising and discomfort. To bridge this gap in knowledge, we will document each injection site during the course of the study and measure the amount of bruising observed using a standardized photographic methodology. Injection site bruising has the potential to cause medical problems if an injection site hematoma develops, which can become infected or can cause long-term discomfort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is receiving warfarin therapy with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.5
  2. Patient requires temporary interruption of warfarin because of elective surgery or procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of allergy to heparin, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
  2. Bridging anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) not indicated
  3. Impaired cognitive function or language barrier
  4. Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min
  5. Patient declines consent
  6. Patient is < 18 years of age.
  7. Patient is not willing and able to self inject.
  8. Patient has significant visual or hand motor impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The primary outcome measure is self-reported comfort score based on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients will complete a 10-point VAS. Patients will complete a VAS at the time of injection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
On the day of the procedure, bruising at injection sites will be evaluated.
Patients will document in a diary each injection before and after the surgery or invasive procedure. On the day of surgery or procedure abdominal bruising measurement will be obtained. A digital photo will be take of the injection site.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Co-Investigators Dr. James Douketis and Karen Woods RN, McMaster University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Study Completion

January 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2009

Last Verified

May 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bruises

Clinical Trials on Enoxaparin

3
Subscribe