Efficacy and Safety of Esflurbiprofen Hydrogel Patch in the Treatment of Local Acute Pain

September 27, 2023 updated by: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd.

The Efficacy and Safety of an Esflurbiprofen Hydrogel Patch vs. Placebo in the Local Symptomatic and Short-term Treatment of Pain in Acute Strains, Sprains or Bruises of the Extremities Following Blunt Trauma, e.g. Sports Injuries.

Objective of this study is:

to determine efficacy and safety of a Esflurbiprofen Hydrogel Patch compared to placebo in patients with acute strains, sprains or bruises of the extremities following blunt trauma, e.g. sports injuries.

to demonstrate that the Esflurbiprofen Hydrogel Patch is superior to placebo, and that the patch has acceptable local tolerability.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Design Randomized (1:1) (stratified by center and 2 subgroups), controlled, double-blind, multi-centric study in parallel groups. Patient Population/Sample size/Study Sites

The clinical trial population will consist of male or female patients, 18 - 60 years suffering from acute; strains, sprains or bruises of the extremities following blunt trauma, and meeting all clinical trial entry criteria.

200 patients will be enrolled (assumes a drop-out-rate of ≤10%).

The study will be performed in Germany in 3 sites

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • NRW
      • Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50933
        • Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln Institut für Kreislaufforschung und Sportmedizin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. acute sports-related soft-tissue injury/contusion (strains, sprains, bruises) of the upper or lower limb
  2. location of injury such that pain-on-movement (POM) is elicited on by specified exercises
  3. enrollment within 6 hours of the injury
  4. baseline VAS score for POM of injured extremity > 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS
  5. size of injury, as assessed by investigator, ≥ 25 cm2 and ≤ 120 cm2
  6. adult male or female patients
  7. age 18 to 60 years
  8. having given written informed consent
  9. satisfactory health as determined by the Investigator based on medical history and physical examination.

Exclusion criteria

  1. significant concomitant injury in association with the index acute sports-related soft- tissue injury/contusion; e.g. fracture, nerve injury, ligament disruption, tear of muscle or cartilage, or open wound
  2. excessively hairy skin at application site, cutting the hair in the injured site prior to patch application will qualify for inclusion
  3. current skin disorder or shaving hair at application site
  4. history of excessive sweating/hyperhidrosis inclusive of application site
  5. intake of NSAIDs or analgesics within 36 hours, opioids within 7 days, or corticosteroids within 60 days of inclusion in the study
  6. intake of long-acting NSAIDs or application of topical medication since the injury (RICE allowed)
  7. participation in a clinical study within 30 days before inclusion in the study or concomitantly
  8. drug or alcohol abuse in the opinion of the investigator
  9. Pregnant and lactating women
  10. Women of child-bearing potential (defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant) who are not using an acceptable method of contraception defined as:

    • Surgical sterilization
    • Hormonal contraception
    • Intra Uterine Device
    • Double barrier method
    • Total abstinence throughout the study at the discretion of the Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Arm
Esflurbiprofen Hydrogel Patch containing 165 mg Esflurbiprofen
Esflurbiprofen is a cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor
Placebo Comparator: Control Drug
Placebo patch that does not contain the active ingredient but is otherwise indistinguishable from the investigational drug Esflurbiprofen Hydrogel Patch
Esflurbiprofen is a cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Pain-on-movement (POM) Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Change from baseline to Visit 5 (72 hours after initiating treatment)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 = "no pain", 100 = "Extreme pain"
Change from baseline to Visit 5 (72 hours after initiating treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain-on-movement (POM) on VAS
Time Frame: Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 hours after initiating treatment
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 = "no pain", 100 = "Extreme pain"
Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 hours after initiating treatment
Area-under-the-curve for POM on VAS
Time Frame: Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 hours after initiating treatment
Area-under-the-curve (AUC) over time during first 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours for Pain on movement (POM) measured using a VAS Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 = "no pain", 100 = "Extreme pain"
Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 hours after initiating treatment
Pain-at-rest on VAS
Time Frame: Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 hours after initiating treatment
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 = "no pain", 100 = "Extreme pain"
Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 hours after initiating treatment
Time to Meaningful and Optimal Reduction
Time Frame: Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 (192) hours after initiating treatment
The time taken to achieve a meaningful (30 %) and optimal (50 %) reduction of pain measured on the VAS for POM Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 = "no pain", 100 = "Extreme pain"
Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 (192) hours after initiating treatment
Time to Complete Resolution of Pain
Time Frame: Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 (192) hours after initiating treatment
Time to complete resolution of pain, i. e. reaching a POM VAS value of 0 mm after start of study treatment Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 = "no pain", 100 = "Extreme pain"
Baseline and 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 (192) hours after initiating treatment
Responder Rate 1
Time Frame: 72 hours
defined as the percentage of patients achieving ≥50% reduction from baseline in the VAS score for POM at 72 hours Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0 = "no pain", 100 = "Extreme pain"
72 hours
Global Efficacy Assessments 1 by Patient
Time Frame: 48 h, 72 h, and 168 h

The global efficacy was assessed by the patients. The patients answered question below;

-Considering all the ways this treatment has affected you since you started the clinical trial, how well are you doing? (5-point Likert scale: 0 = very good, 1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = poor, and 4 = very poor). [Global efficacy assessment 1]

48 h, 72 h, and 168 h
Global Efficacy Assessments 2 by Patient
Time Frame: 48 h, 72 h, and 168 h

The global efficacy was assessed by the patients. The patients answered question below

-How do you rate this medication as treatment for your soft injury/contusion? (5-point Likert scale: 0 = excellent, 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, and 4 = poor). [Global efficacy assessment 2]

48 h, 72 h, and 168 h
Global Efficacy Assessments 1 by Investigator
Time Frame: 48 h, 72 h, and 168 h

The global efficacy was assessed by the investigator.

-Considering all the ways this treatment has affected you since you started the clinical trial, how well are you doing? (5-point Likert scale: 0 = very good, 1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = poor, and 4 = very poor). [Global efficacy assessment 1]

48 h, 72 h, and 168 h
Use of Rescue Medication
Time Frame: 0-168h
Rescue medication (paracetamol, 500 mg tablets, up to 3000 mg daily) was allowed during the study, except for the 6 hours prior to V5 (72 h).
0-168h
Resolution of Soft Tissue Injury/Contusion
Time Frame: 168h
Resolution of soft tissue injury/contusion was assessed by the Investigator at Visit 7 (168h).
168h
SPID of POM VAS Changes
Time Frame: 0-24 h, 0-48 h, 0-72 h, and 0-96 h

The sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) of POM on VAS changes over 0-24 h, 0-48 h, 0-72 h, and 0-96 h were calculated.

SPID was calculated as the area under the curve of the VAS difference from baseline value.

0-24 h, 0-48 h, 0-72 h, and 0-96 h
Responder Rate 2 at 168h
Time Frame: 168h
defined as the percentage of patients able to resume training/normal physical activity by 168 hours
168h

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adhesive Power of the Patch
Time Frame: 12h for day 1, 24h for day 1-5 and 7 after application of each patch
Adhesive power of the patch measured by a 5 point numerical scale (0= ≥ 90 % adhered, 1= ≥ 75 % to < 90 % adhered, 2= ≥ 50 % to < 75 % adhered, 3= > 0 % to <50 % adhered, 4=completely detached) at every visit except V1.
12h for day 1, 24h for day 1-5 and 7 after application of each patch
Local Tolerability
Time Frame: 24, 48, 72, 96, 168h

Local tolerability was assessed by the Investigator according to the following numerical scale:

0: No evidence of irritation

  1. Minimal erythema, barely perceptible
  2. Definite erythema, readily visible, minimal edema or minimal papular response
  3. Erythema and papules
  4. Definite edema
  5. Erythema, edema and papules
  6. Vesicular eruption
  7. Strong reaction spreading beyond test site
24, 48, 72, 96, 168h

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hiroshi Aoki, Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TK-254R-0201

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Injuries

Clinical Trials on Esflurbiprofen Hydrogel Patch

3
Subscribe