Effects of Testosterone Replacement on Pain Sensitivity and Pain Perception (TAP)

May 26, 2017 updated by: Shehzad Basaria, Boston University

Effects of Testosterone Replacement on Pain Sensitivity and Pain Perception in Men With Chronic Pain Syndrome

Naturally occurring opiates (endorphins) decrease testosterone levels by inhibiting the synthesis of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and also inhibiting testosterone synthesis by the testes. Similarly, men with addiction to narcotics and those on exogenous opioids for pain control have decreased serum testosterone levels. Indeed, these men complain of decreased libido, erectile dysfunction and impaired quality of life. Animal studies have shown that gonadectomy results in a decrease in pain threshold in rats and repletion of testosterone elevates that threshold. These observations suggest that testosterone may possess analgesic properties. Hence, the investigators hypothesize that hypogonadism developing in men on opioids results in an increased sensitivity to pain and requirement of higher doses of opioids. In this study, the investigators plan to administer testosterone to men with opioid-induced hypogonadism and evaluate their pain perception, pain sensitivity in response to noxious stimuli and changes in the requirement of opioids in response to testosterone administration.

Hypothesis:

Testosterone replacement in men with opioid-induced hypogonadism will improve pain tolerance, pain perception and quality of life.

Specific aims:

  1. To evaluate the effects of testosterone replacement on pain sensitivity, pain tolerance, and pain modulation in men with opioid-induced hypogonadism.
  2. To determine the effects of testosterone replacement on health-related quality of life.
  3. To determine whether testosterone replacement in hypogonadal men induces changes in the dosage requirements of opioid medications for pain control.

To accomplish our specific aims, the investigators propose a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel arm study in which hypogonadal men with non-cancer chronic back pain syndrome on chronic opioids and low testosterone levels (<300 ng/dl) will be randomized to exogenous testosterone replacement therapy vs placebo. Our primary outcome is change in pain tolerance using various external painful stimuli. Secondary outcomes are change in pain sensitivity and modulation, quality of life and opioid requirements.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men
  • Age 18 years and older
  • Non-cancer chronic pain
  • Serum total testosterone level <350 ng/dl
  • Consumption of at least 20 mg of hydrocodone (or analgesic equivalent of another opioid) for at least 4 weeks
  • Absence of hospitalization in the past 2 months
  • No acute illness in the past 2 months
  • No current anabolic therapy (growth hormone, DHEA, etc)
  • No current use or consumption in the past 2 months of melatonin
  • Normal prostate exam
  • Normal PSA level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer-related chronic pain
  • Liver enzymes > 3 times upper limit of normal
  • Serum creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal
  • Neurological disease
  • Active psychiatric illness
  • Any addictive drug use
  • Alcoholism (>3 drinks/day)
  • Patients currently receiving melatonin or anabolic agents
  • Hospitalization in the past 2 months
  • Acute illness in the past 2 months
  • Consumption of < 20 mg of hydrocodone (or analgesic equivalent of another opioid)
  • Severe BPH
  • PSA > 4.0 ng/ml
  • Prostate cancer
  • Breast cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo gel
5g gel, applied once daily to the upper arms, upper back or shoulders.
Active Comparator: Androgel (testosterone gel)
Testosterone replacement therapy
5g gel, applied once daily to the upper arms, upper back or shoulders.
Other Names:
  • testosterone gel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at Week 14
Time Frame: Week14 after intervention
BPI is a self-administered questionnaire that measuring chronic pain. BPI gives two main scores: a pain severity score and a pain interference score. The pain severity score assesses the severity of pain on a continuous scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference, ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10(completely interferes). The total score is the sum of the pain severity score and pain interference score, ranging from 0(no pain) to 20 (severe and completely interfered pain).
Week14 after intervention
Algometer-induced Pressure Pain at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
A digital pressure algometer at the trapezius muscle and the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb was used to measure pressure pain thresholds. Higher values represent a better tolerance of pressure pain.
Week 14 after intervention
Weighted Pinprick Stimulator-induced Mechanical Pain at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Weighted pinprick stimulators are used to assess mechanical pain. Lower values represent better tolerance of pain.
Week 14 after intervention
Ice Water-induced Cold Pain and Its After-sensation at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Cold-pressor tests measure cold-induced pain and its sensation. Time was measured when a participant reached pain tolerance in cold water and after sensation. Higher values of time in Cold pain tolerance and lower values of time in Cold pain after-sensation (30 seconds) represent better tolerance of pain.
Week 14 after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexual Functioning as Assessed by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at Week 14
Time Frame: Week14 after intervention
IIEF is a validated, 15-item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains of sexual function: erectile function (range 1-30), orgasmic function (range 0-10), sexual desire (range 2-10), intercourse satisfaction (range 0-15), and overall sexual satisfaction (range 2-10). Each question was answered on a 6-point or 5-point scale from 0/1 to 5 (best) with a total possible score (sum of 5 domains) range of 5 to 75 with higher scores representing better function.
Week14 after intervention
Health Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
The SF-36 measures 8 domains of the QoL: physical function, bodily pain, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, general health perceptions, emotional well-being, social function, and role limitations due to emotional problems. Each domain is scored separately from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health-related QoL.
Week 14 after intervention
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at Week 14
Time Frame: Values at week 14 after intervention
PCS questionnaire measures self-assessment of pain catastrophizing. This questionnaire consists of 13 items on past painful experiences and rate on 5-point scales ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). The PCS yields three subscale scores assessing rumination (range 0-16), magnification (range 0-12), helplessness (range 0-24), and a composite score (sum of three domains, ranging 0-52). Higher score represents worse painful experiences.
Values at week 14 after intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Testosterone Values at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Total testosterone was measured in a CDC-certified laboratory using an LC-MS/MS method with a sensitivity of 2 ng/dL.
Week 14 after intervention
Free Testosterone Values at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Free testosterone was calculated using a law of mass action equation.
Week 14 after intervention
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Sex hormone binding globulin was measured using immunofluorometric assays, with limits of quantification of 2.5 nmol/L.
Week 14 after intervention
Luteinizing Hormone Values at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Luteinizing hormone was measured using immunofluorometric assays, with limits of quantification of 0.05 U/L.
Week 14 after intervention
Inflammatory Cytokines at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
The pathophysiology of pain is measured by the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-Alpha).
Week 14 after intervention
Body Composition at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Body composition was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan.
Week 14 after intervention
Lipid Profile at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Serum total cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were measured by enzymatic assays and standardized to the CDC using the Lipid Research Clinic protocol. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald equation.
Week 14 after intervention
HbA1c at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Week 14 after intervention
Glucose Level in Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
All participants underwent 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after a 12-h fast, The plasma glucose level were analyzed at baseline and at 60 and 120 min after glucose loading.
Week 14 after intervention
Insulin Level in Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 14
Time Frame: Values at week 14 after intervention
All participants underwent 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after a 12-h fast, The insulin level were analyzed at baseline and at 60 and 120 min after glucose loading.
Values at week 14 after intervention
HOMA IR Score at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index: glucose * insulin / 22.5.
Week 14 after intervention
Adiponectin at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Total adiponectin was measured using an RIA kit with an interassay CV of 6.9-9.3% and an intra-assay CV of 1.8-6.2% (Millipore).
Week 14 after intervention
Leptin at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
Leptin levels were measured using ELISA with an interassay CV of 2.6% to 6.2% and in intra-assay CV of 2.6% to 4.6% (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
Week 14 after intervention
C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Alpco Diagnostics) was measured using a high-sensitivity sandwich ELISA with an intra-assay CV of 5.6%
Week 14 after intervention
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at Week 14
Time Frame: Week 14 after intervention
ISI is comprised of 7 items assesses a participant's perception of insomnia. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Scores from the questions are summed to assign a total score ranging from 0 to 28, where higher score represents worse insomnia problem.
Week 14 after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on AndroGel

3
Subscribe