Pilot Study for HLA Identical Living Donor Renal Transplant Recipients

November 12, 2014 updated by: Rita Alloway, University of Cincinnati

A Pilot Study of Corticosteroid-Free, Calcineurin-Sparing Immunosuppression Protocol for HLA-Identical Living Donor Renal Transplant Recipient

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a steroid-free and calcineurin-inhibitor free treatment regimen for patients who are receiving a kidney transplant from a living donor that is HLA-identical (has a similar immune system).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a steroid-free and calcineurin-inhibitor free treatment regimen for patients who are receiving a kidney transplant from a living donor that is HLA - identical, or in other words, has a similar immune system. The immune system is a defense system that the body uses to fight foreign substances that enter the body, such as a transplanted kidney. Two people with similar immune systems are less likely to fight off or reject an organ donated from one to the other. HLA-identical kidney transplant recipients are less likely to need large amounts of immunosuppression because they are immunologically similar. In this study, you will be treated with the immunosuppressive medications, Cellcept, Rapamune, and Prograf and after a rejection free period will remain on Cellcept alone. This treatment regimen is currently being used at The University of Cincinnati for all HLA-identical living donor kidney transplant recipients. This study is being conducted to determine if the protocol currently being used results in beneficial outcomes for HLA-identical kidney transplant recipients.

Only recently have transplant centers considered avoiding steroid therapy (prednisone) in any transplant patient because steroids have been used successfully for so long, but with many side effects. The ability to stop steroids has occurred due to the availability of newer more effective immunosuppressive medications. Stopping steroids has been tried in patients who are considered to be at both low and higher risk of kidney rejection. Patients considered at risk for rejection may typically be left on steroids forever or no attempts to stop the steroids would be made until the patient is one year after transplant and has already received a lot of steroid therapy resulting in side effects. This study will be conducted in patients that are low risk for rejection and can potentially benefit from steroid avoidance.

Overall, the concept of steroid avoidance in patients that are at low risk for rejection is now much more acceptable because newer, more potent medications have recently become available to prevent acute rejection. These newer medications include Prograf (tacrolimus), Cellcept (mycophenolate mofetil), and Rapamune (sirolimus). Currently, most kidney transplant recipients receive medications consisting of tacrolimus or cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine, and steroids. However, recently, the combination of Prograf (tacrolimus) and Rapamune (sirolimus) with steroid withdrawal 3 months after transplantation was studied in patients receiving liver, liver/kidney, and kidney/pancreas transplants. This study showed a low rate of acute rejection with excellent patient and kidney survival.

The addition of Cellcept to Prograf and Rapamune is thought to be a safe and effective alternative to the use of steroids in transplant patients. Due to the low risk of rejection for HLA-identical kidney transplant recipients, patients in this study will be slowly withdrawn from both Rapamune and Prograf over a rejection free period of time. Withdrawal of these medications and avoidance of steroids could decrease the development of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, tremors, and infection after transplant. This study will determine if this medication regimen is safe, effective, and able to produce beneficial post transplant outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 70 years
  • Male/female recipients
  • All ethnic groups
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Practicing an acceptable form of birth control
  • Signing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known sensitivity or contraindication to mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, or sirolimus
  • Re-transplants who lost primary transplant from immunologic causes (patients with graft loss secondary to technical or calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity will be included)
  • Liver, heart, pancreas or small bowel transplant recipient
  • Fasting total cholesterol >300 mg/dL and fasting triglycerides >400 mg/dL
  • Baseline WBC count <3000/cu.mm
  • Baseline platelet count <100,000/cu.mm
  • Known or suspected malignancy within previous 3 years, (Patients with squamous cell and basal skin cancer are not excluded)
  • Active systemic infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Incidence of biopsy confirmed acute rejection at 12 and 24 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Graft survival
Patient survival
Early discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, or sirolimus due to toxicity
Time to acute rejection from transplant
Severity of acute rejection measure by Banff'93 criteria, and/or requirement of antilymphocyte treatment; need for corticosteroid pulse or maintenance therapy for rejection or recurrent disease
Evaluation of 24-hour proteinuria at 24 months post-transplant
Evaluation of graft function by calculated CrCl (Cockroft-Gault) at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplant
Patient weight
Quantitative bone loss
Cholesterol and triglyceride levels at 12 and 24 months
Cardiovascular risk assessment by Framingham criteria at 0, 1, and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rita Alloway, Pharm.D., University of Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Transplant

Clinical Trials on sirolimus

3
Subscribe