A Study of Tenecteplase for Restoration of Function in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Catheters (TROPICS 3)

May 1, 2010 updated by: Genentech, Inc.

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tenecteplase for Restoration of Function in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Catheters

This was a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 37 centers in the United States. 150 subjects ≥ 16 years of age who required hemodialysis (HD) and had a dysfunctional HD catheter were enrolled in the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically stable, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Use of a cuffed, tunneled HD catheter
  • HD prescribed at a BFR of ≥300 mL/min
  • Baseline BFR (at any time during the first 60 minutes of HD) of <300 mL/min at an associated pre-pump negative arterial pressure in the range between and including -240 mmHg and -280 mmHg
  • Baseline BFR (at any time during the first 60 minutes of HD) at least 25 mL/min below the prescribed BFR
  • Demonstrated BFR of ≥300 mL/min (using catheter lines in the customary direction) at an arterial pressure in the range of 0 to -280 mmHg in at least one HD session in the 14 days prior to Visit 1
  • Anticipated use of the same catheter for at least four consecutive HD sessions, on the same type and model of HD apparatus
  • Able to have fluids infused at the volume necessary to instill study drug into the HD catheter

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HD catheter with sustainable BFR of ≥300 mL/min following subject repositioning
  • HD catheter inserted <2 days prior to screening
  • Evidence of a mechanical, non-thrombotic cause of HD catheter dysfunction (e.g., kink in the catheter or suture constricting the catheter) or dysfunction caused by known fibrin sheath
  • Use of an implantable port
  • HD catheter that is internally coated with any therapeutic agent (e.g., the Decathlon™ Gold catheter)
  • Anticipated use of catheter for any other type of diagnostic or therapeutic procedure (i.e., other than HD) during study drug treatment
  • Previously treated in this study or any tenecteplase catheter clearance trial
  • Use of any investigational drug or therapy (defined as any drug or therapy that is not FDA approved) within 28 days prior to screening
  • Use of a fibrinolytic agent (e.g., alteplase, tenecteplase, reteplase, or urokinase) within 7 days prior to Visit 1
  • Known to be pregnant or breastfeeding at screening or at Visit 1
  • Known bacteremia or known or suspected infection in the HD catheter
  • Known history of any of the following: intracranial hemorrhage (within the previous 3 years), intracranial aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation
  • Use of heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight) or other anticoagulants (e.g., for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) within 24 hours prior to Visit 1, except for heparin used only during HD or for prophylaxis (e.g., heparin lock or deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis)
  • Subjects treated with warfarin only: international normalized ratio (INR) >3.0 within 7 days prior to Visit 1, or a target INR range that allows for an INR >3.0 A laboratory test to confirm the INR must have been performed within 7 days prior to Visit 1.
  • Initiation of or increase in dose of Plavix® (clopidogrel bisulfate) within 7 days prior to Visit 1
  • Hemoglobin ≥12.0 g/dL if on an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (e.g., darbepoetin or erythropoietin) and the dose of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent has not been held or reduced per institutional policy
  • At high risk for bleeding events or embolic complications (i.e., recent pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis, endarterectomy, or clinically significant right-to-left shunt) in the opinion of the investigator, or with known condition for which bleeding constitutes a significant hazard
  • BFR of <300 mL/min because of symptomatic hypotension
  • Uncontrolled hypertension in the opinion of the investigator
  • Known hypersensitivity to tenecteplase or any component of the formulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
For the initial treatment, 2 mL of reconstituted lyophilized tenecteplase instilled into each lumen of the HD catheter; subsequent treatments were 2 mL of open-label tenecteplase
Placebo Comparator: 2
For the initial treatment, 2 mL of placebo instilled into each lumen of the HD catheter; subsequent treatments were 2 mL of open-label tenecteplase

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Who Had Treatment Success With Respect to Blood Flow Rate (BFR) at Visit 1
Time Frame: Visit 1 of HD treatment
Treatment success is defined as BFR of ≥300 mL/min and an increase from baseline BFR of ≥25 mL/min at an associated target arterial pressure in the range of 0 to -280 mmHg 30 (±10) minutes prior to the end of HD and at the end of HD.
Visit 1 of HD treatment
Incidence of Targeted Adverse Events (AEs) From Initial Study Drug Administration Through the Start of Visit 2
Time Frame: Visits 1 and 2 of consecutive HD treatments
Targeted AEs were intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs), major bleeding, embolic events, thrombosis, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), and catheter related complications
Visits 1 and 2 of consecutive HD treatments

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in BFR From Baseline to the End of HD at Visit 1
Time Frame: Visit 1 of HD treatment
BFR is measured in mL/minute.
Visit 1 of HD treatment
Percentage of Subjects Who Had Treatment Success With Respect to BFR at Visit 2 (MITT Population With Extended Dwell Tenecteplase at Visit 1)
Time Frame: Visit 2 of consecutive HD treatments
Treatment success is defined as BFR of ≥300 mL/min and an increase from baseline BFR of ≥25 mL/min at an associated target arterial pressure in the range of 0 to -280 mmHg 30 (±10) minutes prior to the end of HD and at the end of HD.
Visit 2 of consecutive HD treatments
Percentage of Subjects Who Had Treatment Success With Respect to BFR at Visit 2 (MITT Population With Open-label Tenecteplase at Visit 2)
Time Frame: Visit 2 of consecutive HD treatments
Treatment success is defined as BFR of ≥300 mL/min and an increase from baseline BFR of ≥25 mL/min at an associated target arterial pressure in the range of 0 to -280 mmHg 30 (±10) minutes prior to the end of HD and at the end of HD.
Visit 2 of consecutive HD treatments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Barbara Gillespie, M.D., FASN

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2010

Last Verified

May 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Catheters

Clinical Trials on tenecteplase

3
Subscribe