- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06352632
A Multi-faCtorial, mulTi-arm, Multi-staGe, Randomised, gLOBal Adaptive pLatform Trial for Stroke (ACT-GLOBAL)
A Multi-faCtorial, mulTi-arm, Multi-staGe, Randomised, gLOBal Adaptive pLatform Trial for Stroke (ACT-GLOBAL)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Stroke is the second leading cause of death, worldwide. It is also the second largest cause of disability-adjusted-life-years (DALYs) lost after ischaemic heart disease in developing countries, and third largest contributor to DALYs in developed countries (after ischaemic heart disease, low back and neck pain). In 2019, the absolute numbers of new strokes (12.2 million), stroke-related deaths (6.6 million), and people living with stroke (101.5 million) had increased globally from 1990 (70%, 43%, and 85% increases, respectively).
Steady progress has been made in establishing specific management strategies for patients affected by, or at high-risk of, stroke. Unfortunately, only a few acute treatments have been proven to be beneficial: thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, hemicraniectomy, stroke unit care, and aspirin. There is a continued need for interventions that improve outcomes which can be implemented with wide applicability for stroke.
ACT-GLOBAL is an investigator-initiated, multi-factorial, multi-arm, multi-stage, randomised, global adaptive platform trial for stroke, aiming to find the treatment/s associated with the highest chance of improving outcome after stroke. In ACT-GLOBAL multiple questions will be evaluated simultaneously and sequentially as data accrues and can evaluate interactions between different treatment options.
Frequent adaptive analyses are conducted to assess whether a given intervention is superior, inferior, or equivalent either within a domain or for specific populations within the domain. Where it is anticipated that interactions between interventions in different domains may be likely, the statistical models will allow evaluation of such interactions. Each intervention within a domain with prospectively defined and mutually exclusive strata (sub-groups) of participants will be evaluated within the strata, while information from one stratum may be used (via 'borrowing') to contribute to the analysis of the effect of that intervention in other strata. Specific interventions or subgroups within overall populations may be dropped or cease to enrol, based on pre-specified rules.
The adaptive design allows new interventions or domains or both to be introduced. A Response Adaptive Randomisation algorithm may be used to preferentially randomize participants to interventions that appear to be performing better in domains where applicable.
Unlike traditional trial designs which explicitly prohibit co-enrollment of patients into different trials or multiple therapies, or use a factorial design, the adaptive platform design allows investigators to replicate the real-world environment to estimate possible synergy, competitive interference, or safety profiles of complex treatment protocols.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Xiaoying Chen, PhD
- Phone Number: +61280524549
- Email: xchen@georgeinstitute.org.au
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Bijoy Menon, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +14033381198
- Email: docbijoymenon@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Platform Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke
Platform Exclusion Criteria:
There are no platform level exclusion criteria
Each state and domain will specify additional inclusion and exclusion criteria in the respective Domain-Specific Registration. Patients who fulfill the overall platform criteria will be assessed for enrollment into each active domain.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: IV thrombolysis domain
This domain has a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group with blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) design to optimize the use of intravenous Tenecteplase in participants with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
|
Standard-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight); one-time IV bolus injection soon after randomisation
Low-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg body weight); one-time IV bolus injection soon after randomisation
No intravenous tenecteplase only in subjects on direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) or those planned for emergency endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)
|
Experimental: ACT-42 domain
This domain has a Phase 2b, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) controlled single-dose adaptive design and aim to determine the efficacy and safety of NoNO-42 in participants with Acute Ischaemic Stroke selected for thrombolysis with or without Endovascular Thrombectomy.
|
100 mL of 0.9% normal saline, administered as a single IV infusion with a 20-minute dosing duration.
NoNO-42 at weight-based dosing - 2.6 mg/Kg, administered as a single IV infusion with a 20-minute dosing duration
|
Experimental: Blood Pressure domain
Third Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombectomy Stroke Study (ENCHANTED3/MT) as a domain of ACT-GLOBAL to compare three BP lowering management strategies, that of conservative, moderate and intensive BP lowering in patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke admitted to participating hospitals who has an elevated SBP after reperfusion therapy via Endovascular Thrombectomy, and reliably determine, which approach leads to improved functional outcome. Locally available and approved i.v. BP lowering agents can be used in this domain. |
SBP reduction by 10-20mmHg or a target of 160 ± 5, whichever is higher; no control if low-high baseline SBP (150-160mmHg); the timing of administration of interventions is specified to be immediately after randomisation; the intervention target is to be achieved ideally at 1 hour after randomisation and maintained for 24 hours (or until hospital discharge or death if this should occur earlier)
SBP reduction by 30-50mmHg or a target of 140±5 mmHg, whichever is higher after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT); the timing of administration of interventions is specified to be immediately after randomisation; the intervention target is to be achieved ideally at 1 hour after randomisation and maintained for 24 hours (or until hospital discharge or death if this should occur earlier)
No or minimal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) control; SBP reduction by 5-10mmHg or a target of 175-180mmHg if very-high baseline SBP (≥180mmHg); the timing of administration of interventions is specified to be immediately after randomisation; the intervention target is to be achieved ideally at 1 hour after randomisation and maintained for 24 hours (or until hospital discharge or death if this should occur earlier)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores
Time Frame: Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
The mRS is a 7-outcome ordered categorical scale that assesses functional neurological status after stroke. It is not intended for use as a measure of historical functional status. It is well accepted as a standard outcome around the world in the stroke community, by patients and by regulatory authorities. The seven values and the clinical summary of the individual scores are summarized in the following: 0 = No symptoms
|
Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Excellent functional neurological outcome
Time Frame: Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Excellent functional neurological outcome means modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 0-1.
The minimum mRS is 0 (no symptoms) while the maximum mRS is 6 (death).
The higher the mRS score is the worse outcome is.
|
Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Independent functional neurological outcome
Time Frame: Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Independent functional neurological outcome means modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 0-2.
The minimum mRS is 0 (no symptoms) while the maximum mRS is 6 (death).
The higher the mRS score is the worse outcome is.
|
Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Health Related Quality of Life based on EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L).The EQ-5D-5L is a generic instrument for describing and valuing health.
It is based on a descriptive system that defines health in terms of five dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression.
Each dimension has five response categories corresponding to: no problems, slight, moderate, severe and extreme problems.
|
Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mortality
Time Frame: Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Mortality status equals to death which will be collected at all visits during the trial period
|
Platform level time frame: 90 days in Ischaemic Stroke State; Domain specific time frame may differ (details will be included in domain-specific registration)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrew Demchuk, MD, University Of Calgary
- Principal Investigator: Michael D Hill, MD, University Of Calgary
- Principal Investigator: Craig Anderson, MD, PhD, The George Institute
- Principal Investigator: Bijoy Menon, MD, University Of Calgary
- Principal Investigator: Xiaoying Chen, PhD, The George Institute
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ACT-GLOBAL_Master
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data can be shared after publication of the main results, based on approval of a submitted protocol to the Publication Committee. Data can be shared to bona fide researchers with experience in medical research, and with no conflict of interest that may potentially influence their interpretation of any analyses, and employed by a recognised academic institute, health service organisation, commercial research organisation of from the pharmaceutical industry. The data sharing will be only for analyses within the constraints of the consent under which the data were originally gathered consent.
Data sharing with industry will be according to relevant contracts with appropriate approvals from all stake holders.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, CryptogenicSingapore, Philippines
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at BirminghamEnrolling by invitationStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Engagement, Patient | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationRecruitingStroke | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke IschemicUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith Foundation for...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Chronic StrokeCanada
-
University of CincinnatiMedical University of South Carolina; University of California, Los Angeles; University...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
Turkish Stroke Research and Clinical Trials NetworkElectroCore INC; Turkish Neurological SocietyCompletedStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke, HemorrhagicTurkey
-
University of LiegeCompletedStroke, Acute | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, ComplicationBelgium
Clinical Trials on Standard-dose intravenous tenecteplase
-
Huashan HospitalShanghai 10th People's Hospital; Shanghai East Hospital; The Second Affiliated... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Hospital Moinhos de VentoBoehringer Ingelheim; Ministry of Health, Brazil; Brainomix Limited; iSchemaView...Recruiting
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of University of...RecruitingBasilar Artery Occlusion | Acute Cerebrovascular Accident | Stroke Due to Basilar Artery OcclusionChina
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity of Edinburgh; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust; University of...UnknownIschemic StrokeUnited Kingdom
-
University of MelbourneProfessor Mark ParsonsRecruiting
-
University of MelbourneRecruitingBasilar Artery OcclusionAustralia
-
Boehringer IngelheimCompleted
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptRecruitingHead and Neck CancerEgypt
-
Tata Medical CenterCompletedMalignant Neoplasm of Oropharynx Stage III | Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx Stage III | Malignant Neoplasm of Hypopharynx Stage III | Malignant Neoplasm of Oropharynx Stage IVa | Malignant Neoplasm of Oropharynx Stage IVb | Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx Stage IV | Malignant Neoplasm of Hypopharynx... and other conditionsIndia
-
University of SydneyGenentech, Inc.RecruitingSTEMI | Elevated IMR (>32)Australia, New Zealand