Ergot and Oxytocin During Cesarean Delivery Following Failure to Progress in Labour

Prophylactic Ergonovine-Oxytocin Versus Oxytocin During Cesarean Delivery Following Failure to Progress in Labour

Despite of marked improvements in clinical management, early postpartum hemorrhage(PPH)remains a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality both in developing countries and in hospitals equipped with all that modern medicine has to offer. This complication is amongst the most challenging that a clinician will face in the obstetric patient. Prevention, early recognition and prompt appropriate intervention are the keys to minimizing the impact of PPH on women's health.

Patients undergoing Cesarean sections following failure to progress in labor are at great risk for PPH and should theoretically benefit from an additional uterotonic agent. This study will be conducted to define whether the addition of ergonovine maleate to oxytocin, administered in a prophylactic way, reduces blood loss during Cesarean section for failure to progress in labor.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Despite of marked improvements in management, early postpartum hemorrhage(PPH)remains a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality both in developing countries and in hospitals equipped with all that modern medicine has to offer. This complication is amongst the most challenging that a clinician will face in Obstetrics. Prevention, early recognition and prompt appropriate intervention are the keys to minimizing the impact of PPH on women's health.

Prophylactic oxytocin, commonly administered after fetal and placental delivery, has been shown to reduce the incidence of PPH. The main advantages of this drug are its rapid onset of action and the fact that it does not cause elevations of blood pressure or tetanic contractions like ergonovine. The effect of oxytocin is limited by the number and status of the oxytocin receptors. Increases in the dose of oxytocin will not necessarily improve uterine contraction, if receptors are not adequate in quantity and quality.This is the cause of patients exposed to oxytocin for labor augmentation, in whom oxytocin receptors are known to reduce both number and response to oxytocin. Therefore, a different uterotonic agent, involving a different mechanism of action should be used instead. Alternative drugs include ergot derivatives and prostaglandins (carboprost and misoprostol). Although protection from PPH with ergot derivatives and prostaglandin appear to be similar, prostaglandins are associated with more side effects.

Patients undergoing Cesarean sections following failure to progress in labor are at great risk for PPH and should theoretically benefit from an additional uterotonic agent. This study will be conducted to define whether the addition of ergonovine maleate to oxytocin, administered in a prophylactic way, reduces blood loss during Cesarean section for failure to progress in labor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cesarean section secondary to failure to progress in labour
  • First stage of labour
  • Received oxytocin for at least 4 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Require General Anesthesia
  • Cardiac Disease
  • Hypertension
  • Predisposition to uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Blood loss
Time Frame: During surgery
During surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Effectiveness of Uterine Contraction
Time Frame: During surgery
During surgery
Side Effects
Time Frame: During surgery
During surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose CA Carvalho, MD PhD, Mount Sinai Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2007

Last Verified

May 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Loss, Surgical

Clinical Trials on Oxytocin

3
Subscribe