Sarcosine or D-Serine Add-on Treatment for Chronic Schizophrenia

June 24, 2007 updated by: China Medical University Hospital

NMDA Enhancers in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Sarcosine vs. D-Serine

Both GlyT-1 inhibitors and NMDA-glycine site agonists have been demonstrated to be beneficial for chronic schizophrenia patients.

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of sarcosine, a GlyT-1 inhibitor, and D-serine, an NMDA-glycine site agonist, in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The etiology of schizophrenia remains unclear. Schizophrenia patients reveal positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive impairments. In addition to dopamine system hyperactivity, hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor plays a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Consequently, enhancing NMDA receptor neurotransmission has been regarded as a novel treatment approach. To date, there have been several reported trials on NMDA enhancers. Both sarcosine (N-methylglycine, a glycine transporter I inhibitor) and D-serine (a potent NMDA-glycine site agonist) showed therapeutic effects in chronically stable patients. Interestingly, sarcosine appeared more efficacious than D-serine in acutely exacerbated ones when added-on to antipsychotics. Both sarcosine and D-serine yielded excellent safety profiles.

It remains unclear whether sarcosine can be also more efficacious than D-serine in the treatment for chronically stable schizophrenia. The aim of this project is to examine the efficacy and safety of add-on treatment of sarcosine vs. D-serine in chronically stable schizophrenia patients who have been stabilized with antipsychotics.

In the study, 60-75 schizophrenic patients are recruited into the 6-week trial and randomly assigned into the three groups (2 gm/d sarcosine, 2 gm/d D-serine, or placebo) with a double-blind manner. Clinical manifestation (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS], side effects and quality of life (QOL) are evaluated every two weeks during the trial.. The efficacies of three groups are compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan, 404
        • China Medical University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfill the criteria of schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual, fourth edition (DSM-IV).
  • Agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meet DSM-IV criteria of major mood disorder, current substance dependence or mental retardation
  • History of epilepsy, head trauma or CNS diseases
  • Major, untreated medical diseases
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total scores of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subscales of PANSS
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hsien-Yuan Lane, MD,PhD, Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2007

Last Verified

June 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe