Two Approaches to Routine HIV Testing in a Hospital Emergency Department

July 16, 2012 updated by: Rochelle Walensky, Massachusetts General Hospital

Optimizing Strategies for Universal HIV Testing (The USHER Trial)

This study will compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to providing routine HIV counseling, testing, and referral services in an urban hospital emergency department setting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

About 25% of HIV infected people do not know that they are infected. These people lack medical care that could prolong their lives and access to counseling services that could prevent further spread of HIV. With so many people unaware of their HIV status, there is a clear need for more readily available HIV counseling, testing, and referral services throughout the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HIV testing in U.S. hospitals in which HIV infected patients make up at least 1% of the total patient population for that hospital. However, routine HIV testing in such hospitals is rarely carried out, which might be because the CDC has not specified who should perform routine HIV testing. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different approaches to providing routine HIV counseling, testing, and referral services in an urban hospital emergency department setting. One approach will be led by an HIV counselor, and the other approach will be led by an emergency department staff member. For both approaches, the study will evaluate to what extent patients accept HIV testing, how well follow-up care is established, and the cost-effectiveness of the approach.

Participants in this study will include adults who visit Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency department in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants will be randomly assigned to a counselor versus provider and will be asked to fill out a questionnaire while waiting in the emergency room. The questionnaire will be anonymous. Participants will then be offered an oral rapid HIV test. Test results will be available in about 20 minutes and will be provided to participants by either their assigned HIV counselor. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered a more definitive blood test to confirm HIV infection. The blood test results will be available 2 weeks from testing, and participants must return to the hospital to get their test results. Participants who test positive for HIV will be offered counseling support and referral services by either their assigned HIV counselor or emergency department staff member. Follow-up care appointments will also be initiated at this time. For participants who test positive for HIV, the study will last about 6 months. There will be no follow-up visits for participants who do not test positive for HIV during their emergency room visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4855

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Waiting to receive care in the Brigham and Women's Hospital emergency room
  • English- or Spanish-speaking
  • Enters the emergency room when an HIV counselor is available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An estimated severity index score of 1 or 2 who have mechanical ventilation or are not deemed alert, awake, and oriented to person, place and time by the triage nurse
  • HIV infected

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Counselor-based HIV screening
Participants will undergo oral HIV screening by HIV counselor and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months
Active Comparator: Emergency staff member-based HIV screening
Participants will undergo oral HIV screening by emergency staff member and, if positive, further study visits for up to 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Linkage to Care of Newly Diagnosed HIV Infected Participants
Time Frame: Assessed within 8 weeks after receipt of reactive rapid HIV test results
We define linkage to care as attendance at a first HIV clinic appointment where the following 3 events occur: 1) introduction to an HIV care primary provider; 2) receipt of confirmatory Western Blot HIV test results; and 3) phlebotomy for CD4 cell count and HIV RNA level.
Assessed within 8 weeks after receipt of reactive rapid HIV test results

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Rapid HIV Testing Rate
Time Frame: Assess on day subject enrolled into the study
We defined the overall rapid HIV testing rate as the number of participants tested for HIV using the rapid test among those randomized to potentially be tested in each arm.
Assess on day subject enrolled into the study

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Test Offer Rate
Time Frame: Assess on day subject enrolled into the study
The offer rate of the HIV test was defined as the proportion of enrolled study participants who were actually offered a test.
Assess on day subject enrolled into the study
Test Acceptance Rate
Time Frame: Assess on day subject enrolled into the study
Acceptance of the HIV test was defined as the proportion of study participants who received the HIV test among those offered the test.
Assess on day subject enrolled into the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe