- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00504933
Efficacy Study for the Symptomatic Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
April 4, 2012 updated by: Faes Farma, S.A.
Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Once Daily and Cetirizine 10 mg for the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.
The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Bilastine 20 mg, compared to Cetirizine and placebo for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In this pivotal, multicentre, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active-comparator controlled, parallel study, 683 patients with SAR will be enrolled.
Patients will be required to be 12-70 years old, have SAR for ≥2 years, a positive skin test, total nasal and non-nasal score (TSS) ≥36 (out of 72) during run-in, and a composite instantaneous nasal symptom score ≥6 (out of 12) the morning before randomization.
The primary efficacy endpoint will be the AUC of reflective TSS from baseline to Day 14.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
683
Phase
- Phase 3
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of either sex between 12 and 70 years of age.
- Patients with documented clinical history of SAR, for at least 2 years prior to the study inclusion.
- Positive skin prick test for at least one of the seasonal allergen specific of the geographical area.
- A previous positive Prick test, or a positive IgE Test (RAST) may also be accepted for inclusion, if performed within 12 months prior to the inclusion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have non-allergic rhinitis (vasomotor, infectious, drug-induced, etc.).
- Negative skin prick test (as defined in point 6.1.1.).
- Patients with nasal polyps or a significant deviation of the nasal septum as judged by the investigator as well as nasal intervention in the previous 6 months. Any other nasal illness that can interfere with the aim of the study.
- Patients who have acute or chronic sinusitis as judged by the investigator.
- Patients who have received anti-allergy immunotherapy in the previous two years or are still receiving this kind of therapy.
- Patients who are taking or have taken specified medications prior to randomisation in the study and have not complied with the specified washout period
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: C
Placebo
|
(encapsulated) Tablets QD/14 days
|
|
Experimental: A
Bilastine
|
20 mg (encapsulated) tablets QD/14days
|
|
Active Comparator: B
Cetirizine
|
10 mg (encapsulated) tablets.
QD/14 days
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Area under curve of total symptoms score (TSS) from basal visit to D14 visit, according to the patient's assessment on reflective symptoms.
Time Frame: 14 days
|
14 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
AUC of TSS from baseline to D14 according to the patient's assessments on instantaneous symptoms.
Time Frame: 14 days
|
14 days
|
|
Change from baseline at day 7 and day 14 for the following: Patient-rated (reflective and instantaneous) and Investigator-rated (instantaneous; assessed during study visit) TSS, NSS, NNSS and change for each individual symptom.
Time Frame: 14 days
|
14 days
|
|
Overall assessment of discomfort caused by SAR using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on day 7 and day 14 vs. day 0.
|
|
|
Investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - assessment of the therapeutic effect and AEs performed at day 14
|
|
|
Responders Rate: responders will be classified based on their TSS decrease from baseline: no responders (<25%), >25%<50%, >50%<75%, >75% and will be described by treatment group with their percentage
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Piotr Kuna, Prof. Dr, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz (Poland)
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Church MK. Safety and efficacy of bilastine: a new H(1)-antihistamine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011 Sep;10(5):779-93. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2011.604029. Epub 2011 Aug 11. Erratum In: Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;11(1):175.
- Bousquet J, Ansotegui I, Canonica GW, Zuberbier T, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bachert C, Cruz AA, Gonzalez SN, Kuna P, Morais-Almeida M, Mullol J, Ryan DP, Sanchez-Borges M, Valiente R, Church MK. Establishing the place in therapy of bilastine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis according to ARIA: evidence review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):131-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.648263. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
- Jauregui I, Garcia-Lirio E, Soriano AM, Gamboa PM, Antepara I. An overview of the novel H1-antihistamine bilastine in allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2012 Jan;8(1):33-41. doi: 10.1586/eci.11.87.
- Kuna P, Bachert C, Nowacki Z, van Cauwenberge P, Agache I, Fouquert L, Roger A, Sologuren A, Valiente R; Bilastine International Working Group. Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Sep;39(9):1338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03257.x. Epub 2009 May 4.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2005
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2005
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2005
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 19, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
July 20, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 5, 2012
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 4, 2012
Last Verified
April 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Infections
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Hypersensitivity, Immediate
- Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
- Respiratory Hypersensitivity
- Hypersensitivity
- Nose Diseases
- Rhinitis
- Rhinitis, Allergic
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Allergic Agents
- Histamine H1 Antagonists
- Histamine Antagonists
- Histamine Agents
- Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating
- Cetirizine
Other Study ID Numbers
- BILA 1704/RAE
- 2004-004586-14 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.