Non Invasive Ventilation in Acute Asthma

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation versus best medical therapy in patients with acute severe asthma

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the past, the mainstay of treatment for patients progressing to respiratory failure from acute asthma was intubation and mechanical ventilation. Newer strategies to prevent these intubations to prevent the inherent complications are being explored in form of various pharmacological means like heliox, magnesium sulfate etc. Non pharmacological strategies among which non invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is one of the most challenging after showing success in patients with chronic obstructive airway disease (COPD) and cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Data on efficacy of NIPPV in the management of AA is sparse but has the potential to improve the management of acute severe asthma. Noninvasive ventilation merits further studies in patients with AA, and some consensus panels have suggested that its widespread application in patients with asthma await such trials.The role of NIPPV is not yet clear and needs further studies and keeping this in view we planned this study to study the role of NIPPV in the management of acute asthma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. History of asthma of at least 1 year
  2. FEV1 < 50% of predicted (by age, height, and gender) or FEV1 < 200 L/minute
  3. Respiratory rate > 30 breaths/min
  4. All patients judged by the attending physician as having an acute attack of asthma ( Inability to speak in sentences in one breath, SaO2 < 92% ,pulsus paradoxus > 10 mm of Hg) -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Smoking history of > 10 years
  2. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  3. Endotracheal intubation
  4. Room air saturation < 88 % or arterial PaO2 < 55 mm of Hg
  5. Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic BP < 90 mm Hg
  6. Altered state of consciousness
  7. Congestive heart failure
  8. Ischemic heart disease
  9. Upper airway obstruction
  10. Facial deformity
  11. Pregnancy
  12. Pulmonary infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema or pneumonia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A
NIPPV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in lung function defined as an increase of at least 50% in FEV1 as compared to baseline value on admission or an increase in FEV1 to > 60% of predicted value
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Intensive care unit length of stay
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in the clinical status
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Disappearance of pulsus paradoxus
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Improvement in arterial blood gases
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Improvement in oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Requirements of FiO2 , medications.
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Need for mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Time to discharge
Time to discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alok Nath, MD, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 3, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2008

Last Verified

February 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on nippv

Subscribe