Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation(NIPPV) vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome:a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

In the past, several studies have compared the effects between nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) on the incidence of intubation in preterm infants, and the results were inconsistent.The purpose of the present study was to compare NIPPV with NCPAP on the need for endotracheal ventilation and subsequent complications

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To this day, early use of noninvasive respiratory support strategies has been suggested to be the most effective pathway to reduce those risks. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are two widely used ways of noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infant. As compared with invasive ventilation, NCPAP reduces the risks abnormal neurodevelopment. However, there is only 60% success rate of avoiding intubation in the preterm neonate supported with NCPAP. Supplying with an intermittent peak pressure on NCPAP, NIPPV is considered as a strengthened version of NCPAP with increased flow delivery in the upper airway, increased minute volume and functional residual capacity and recruitment of collapsed alveoli, improved stability of the chest wall and reduced asynchrony of thoraco-abdominal movement,which have been proven to be crucial to decrease the incidences of invasive ventilation and death. However, studies have compared the effects between nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) on the incidence of intubation in preterm infants, and the results were inconsistent.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400042
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Pediatrics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 minutes to 6 hours (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age (GA) is from 26 to 37 weeks;
  • Diagnosis of RDS. The diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome(RDS) will be based on clinical manifestations (tachypnea, nasal flaring and or grunting) and chest X-ray findings;
  • RDS Silverman score>5;
  • Informed parental consent has been obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe RDS requiring early intubation according to the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for neonatal resuscitation;
  • Major congenital malformations or complex congenital heart disease;
  • Group B hemolytic streptococcus pneumonia, septicemia, pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage;
  • Cardiopulmonary arrest needing prolonged resuscitation;
  • Transferred out of the neonatal intensive care unit without treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NIPPV
NIPPV is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
NIPPV is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
Active Comparator: NCPAP
NCPAP is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
NCPAP is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intubation rate
Time Frame: within 7 days
the infant is intubated ventilation
within 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraventricular hemorrhage
Time Frame: within 28 days
the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage
within 28 days
bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time Frame: at a post-menstrual age of 36 weeks or at discharge
bronchopulmonary dysplasia was defined according to the National Institutes of Health consensus definition
at a post-menstrual age of 36 weeks or at discharge
Bayley Scales of Infant Development
Time Frame: at 2 months old and 2 years old
scores of Bayley Scales of Infant Development
at 2 months old and 2 years old
Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)
Time Frame: within 7 days
the incidence of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis(>stage II);for NEC, Bell staging will be used
within 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Clinical Trials on NIPPV

3
Subscribe