- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00525044
Double-blind Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Tolerance of Ambroxol Lozenges 20 mg in Sore Throat
Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerance of Ambroxol Lozenges 20 mg in the Treatment of Sore Throat in Patients With Acute Viral Pharyngitis
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Male and female ambulant patients complaining of a sore throat caused by acute viral pharyngitis. Every patient may be included in the trial only once. A total of 250 male and female ambulant patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years will be enrolled. Approximately 8 centers will be recruited each enrolling approximately 30-32 patients.
Study Hypothesis:
The two-sided test hypothesis, that the results of the active treatment group with 20 mg Ambroxol and the placebo group do not differ with regard to the primary endpoint (null hypothesis (H0) will be tested against the alternative (H1) that they are not equal.
Comparison(s):
PRIMARY ENDPOINT:
Indication of pain on the VRS (PI)-verbal rating scale (pain intensity)-in the first 3 hours (the patient rates his/her pain on a six-point verbal rating scale).
SECONDARY ENDPOINT (S):
- Patient's assessment of effectiveness and tolerance. The patient assesses the effectiveness and the tolerance of the test medicine for treating his sore throat at the end of the first and second day of treatment, by means of a verbal rating scale.
- Participating doctors assessment of tolerance.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nanjing, China
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
-
Shanghai, China
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
-
Shanghai, China
- ENT Subsidiary of Fudan University Hospital
-
Wuhan, China
- Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
1. Patients having a sore throat with acute viral pharyngitis. 2. Female and male ambulant patients between the ages of 18 and 65. 3. The throat pain intensity is rated at least severe on the VRS (PI). 4. Written Informed Consent is given by the patient. 5. Compliance by the patient seems guaranteed.
- Patients with symptoms of primarily bacterial pharyngitis or bacterial secondary infection (clinical findings; inter alia assessment of exudate).
- First indication of symptoms of acute pharyngitis (e.g., sore throat) occurred more than 3 days ago already.
- Counting of white blood cell in blood routine examination exceeds 10?109/L.
- Patients who suffered from acute viral or bacterial pharyngitis in the past 4 weeks.
- Broncho-motor disorders or concomitant diseases with relatively large quantities of secretion (danger of secretion blockage).
- Known hypersensitivity to Ambroxol or to auxiliary substances contained in the tablet.
- Previous and/or existing tumour condition.
- Pregnancy and/or breast-feeding.
- Alcohol, and/or drug abuse.
- Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control
|
|
|
Experimental: Ambroxol
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPIDnorm)-Time-weighted Average of the Pain Intensity Difference (PID) From Pre-dose Baseline Over the First 3 Hours After the First Lozenge Expressed as a Ratio of the Pre-dose Baseline
Time Frame: pre-dose baseline and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes
|
The calculation will be based on the pain intensity (PI) assessment by the patient before and then at (pain intensity difference at 30 minutes (PID30)), (pain intensity difference at 60 minutes (PID60)), (pain intensity difference at 120 minutes (PID120)) and (pain intensity difference at 180 minutes (PID180)) after the 1st lozenge.
Using the difference in PI from pre-dose baseline for each time point subsequent to dosing, the SPIDnorm will be calculated as SPIDnorm = (30*PID30 + 30*PID60 + 60*PID120 + 60*PID180)/(180*PI (baseline)) The patient rates the intensity of his sore throat pain on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) pain intensity (PI) before taking the first lozenge and 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes thereafter, and enters his rating in his patient's diary .
The rating scale is as follows: 0=no pain; 1=hardly any pain; 2=slight pain; 3=moderate pain; 4=severe pain; 5=very severe pain.
|
pre-dose baseline and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity (PI) as Rated on a 6-point VRS by the Patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 Hours After the First Lozenge
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours
|
Pain intensity (PI) as rated on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) by the patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours after the first lozenge. The patient rates the intensity of his sore throat condition on a 6-point rating scale [VRS(PI)-verbal rating scale (pain intensity)] before taking the first lozenge and 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes thereafter, and enters his rating in his patient's diary . The rating scale is as follows: 0=no pain; 1=hardly any pain; 2=slight pain; 3=moderate pain; 4=severe pain; 5=very severe pain. Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) are presented for this outcome measure. |
0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours
|
|
Pain Intensity Difference From Pre-dose Baseline (PID) as Rated on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) by the Patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 Hours After the First Lozenge
Time Frame: pre-dose baseline and 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours
|
Pain intensity difference from pre-dose baseline (PID) as rated on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) by the patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours after the first lozenge. Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) are presented for this outcome measure. |
pre-dose baseline and 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours
|
|
Assessment of Redness of the Pharyngeal Mucosa by the Investigator on a 5-point VRS at Pre-dose Baseline and at the End-of-study Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 2
|
Assessment of redness of the pharyngeal mucosa by the investigator on a 5-point VRS (normal, slightly red, clearly red, very red, severe inflammation) at pre-dose baseline and at the end-of-study evaluation.
|
Day 1 and Day 2
|
|
Assessment of Patients' Assessment of Effectiveness on a 5-point VRS at Pre-dose Baseline and at the End-of-study Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 2
|
Assessment of Patients' Assessment of Effectiveness on a 5-point VRS ("very good", "good", "neither good nor poor", "not very good", "not at all good") at pre-dose baseline and at the end-of-study evaluation
|
Day 1 and Day 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator, Boehringer Ingelheim Shanghai
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18.490
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pharyngitis
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionGöteborg University; James Cook University, Queensland, AustraliaCompletedTonsillitis | Pharyngitis | Sore Throat | Streptococcus Pharyngitis | Pharyngitis BacterialSweden
-
Valenta Pharm JSCRecruitingPharyngitis | Nasopharyngitis | Pharyngitis Acute | Exacerbation of Chronic PharyngitisRussian Federation
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandNot yet recruitingAcute Pharyngitis | Viral Sore ThroatFrance
-
Andrew SteerNational Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; Queen Fabiola Children... and other collaboratorsCompletedBacterial Infections | Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections | Strep Throat | Streptococcus Pharyngitis | Streptococcus Pyogenes Pharyngitis | Streptococcus Pyogenes Infection | Group A Streptococcus: B Hemolytic Pharyngitis | Group A Streptococcal InfectionAustralia
-
Nakhia Impex LLCNot yet recruitingNasal Obstruction | Chronic Rhinitis | Nasopharyngitis | Chronic Pharyngitis | Posterior Pharyngeal Inflammation
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Recruiting
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonBioMérieuxCompleted
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationCompleted
-
Luminex CorporationCompletedPharyngitis BacterialUnited States
-
Dentaid SLMethodexCompleted
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of