Double-blind Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Tolerance of Ambroxol Lozenges 20 mg in Sore Throat

April 23, 2019 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerance of Ambroxol Lozenges 20 mg in the Treatment of Sore Throat in Patients With Acute Viral Pharyngitis

The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of Ambroxol lozenges 20 mg in the treatment of sore throat in patients with acute viral pharyngitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Male and female ambulant patients complaining of a sore throat caused by acute viral pharyngitis. Every patient may be included in the trial only once. A total of 250 male and female ambulant patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years will be enrolled. Approximately 8 centers will be recruited each enrolling approximately 30-32 patients.

Study Hypothesis:

The two-sided test hypothesis, that the results of the active treatment group with 20 mg Ambroxol and the placebo group do not differ with regard to the primary endpoint (null hypothesis (H0) will be tested against the alternative (H1) that they are not equal.

Comparison(s):

PRIMARY ENDPOINT:

Indication of pain on the VRS (PI)-verbal rating scale (pain intensity)-in the first 3 hours (the patient rates his/her pain on a six-point verbal rating scale).

SECONDARY ENDPOINT (S):

  1. Patient's assessment of effectiveness and tolerance. The patient assesses the effectiveness and the tolerance of the test medicine for treating his sore throat at the end of the first and second day of treatment, by means of a verbal rating scale.
  2. Participating doctors assessment of tolerance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

249

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nanjing, China
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China
        • ENT Subsidiary of Fudan University Hospital
      • Wuhan, China
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

1. Patients having a sore throat with acute viral pharyngitis. 2. Female and male ambulant patients between the ages of 18 and 65. 3. The throat pain intensity is rated at least severe on the VRS (PI). 4. Written Informed Consent is given by the patient. 5. Compliance by the patient seems guaranteed.

  1. Patients with symptoms of primarily bacterial pharyngitis or bacterial secondary infection (clinical findings; inter alia assessment of exudate).
  2. First indication of symptoms of acute pharyngitis (e.g., sore throat) occurred more than 3 days ago already.
  3. Counting of white blood cell in blood routine examination exceeds 10?109/L.
  4. Patients who suffered from acute viral or bacterial pharyngitis in the past 4 weeks.
  5. Broncho-motor disorders or concomitant diseases with relatively large quantities of secretion (danger of secretion blockage).
  6. Known hypersensitivity to Ambroxol or to auxiliary substances contained in the tablet.
  7. Previous and/or existing tumour condition.
  8. Pregnancy and/or breast-feeding.
  9. Alcohol, and/or drug abuse.
  10. Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
Experimental: Ambroxol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPIDnorm)-Time-weighted Average of the Pain Intensity Difference (PID) From Pre-dose Baseline Over the First 3 Hours After the First Lozenge Expressed as a Ratio of the Pre-dose Baseline
Time Frame: pre-dose baseline and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes
The calculation will be based on the pain intensity (PI) assessment by the patient before and then at (pain intensity difference at 30 minutes (PID30)), (pain intensity difference at 60 minutes (PID60)), (pain intensity difference at 120 minutes (PID120)) and (pain intensity difference at 180 minutes (PID180)) after the 1st lozenge. Using the difference in PI from pre-dose baseline for each time point subsequent to dosing, the SPIDnorm will be calculated as SPIDnorm = (30*PID30 + 30*PID60 + 60*PID120 + 60*PID180)/(180*PI (baseline)) The patient rates the intensity of his sore throat pain on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) pain intensity (PI) before taking the first lozenge and 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes thereafter, and enters his rating in his patient's diary . The rating scale is as follows: 0=no pain; 1=hardly any pain; 2=slight pain; 3=moderate pain; 4=severe pain; 5=very severe pain.
pre-dose baseline and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity (PI) as Rated on a 6-point VRS by the Patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 Hours After the First Lozenge
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours

Pain intensity (PI) as rated on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) by the patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours after the first lozenge.

The patient rates the intensity of his sore throat condition on a 6-point rating scale [VRS(PI)-verbal rating scale (pain intensity)] before taking the first lozenge and 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes thereafter, and enters his rating in his patient's diary . The rating scale is as follows: 0=no pain; 1=hardly any pain; 2=slight pain; 3=moderate pain; 4=severe pain; 5=very severe pain.

Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) are presented for this outcome measure.

0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours
Pain Intensity Difference From Pre-dose Baseline (PID) as Rated on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) by the Patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 Hours After the First Lozenge
Time Frame: pre-dose baseline and 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours

Pain intensity difference from pre-dose baseline (PID) as rated on a 6-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) by the patient at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours after the first lozenge.

Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) are presented for this outcome measure.

pre-dose baseline and 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours
Assessment of Redness of the Pharyngeal Mucosa by the Investigator on a 5-point VRS at Pre-dose Baseline and at the End-of-study Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 2
Assessment of redness of the pharyngeal mucosa by the investigator on a 5-point VRS (normal, slightly red, clearly red, very red, severe inflammation) at pre-dose baseline and at the end-of-study evaluation.
Day 1 and Day 2
Assessment of Patients' Assessment of Effectiveness on a 5-point VRS at Pre-dose Baseline and at the End-of-study Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 2
Assessment of Patients' Assessment of Effectiveness on a 5-point VRS ("very good", "good", "neither good nor poor", "not very good", "not at all good") at pre-dose baseline and at the end-of-study evaluation
Day 1 and Day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator, Boehringer Ingelheim Shanghai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pharyngitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe