Study to Determine Treatment Effects of Denosumab in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy

July 19, 2023 updated by: Amgen

A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase 3 Study to Determine the Treatment Effect of Denosumab in Subjects With Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether denosumab compared to placebo, will reduce the rate of first clinical fracture in women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving (non-steroidal) aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants will remain on treatment until the required number of events (where an event is defined as first clinical fracture) is reached and all participants have had the opportunity to receive a minimum of at least 2 doses of study drug, whichever occurs later. The primary analysis data cut-off date (PADCD) is defined as the time at which the required number of events is reached and all participants have had the opportunity to receive at least 2 doses of study drug. When the PADCD is reached, all participants will discontinue study drug.

Following the study PADCD, participants will be followed every 12 months starting from their last study visit until a maximum of 66 months after PADCD.

After approval of Amendment 4, willing and eligible participants randomized to placebo during the double-blind phase may participate in an open-label phase (OLP) and receive denosumab 60 mg Q6M for up to 36 months (maximum of 7 doses).

After approval of Amendment 6 in 2019 a zoledronic acid (ZA) substudy was added to the protocol. Willing and eligible participants who participated in the OLP of the study and completed open-label denosumab may opt in to this ZA substudy and either receive a single dose of ZA (Therapy Arm), or be managed according to the current standard of care for this patient population (Control Arm).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3420

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Baden, Austria, 2500
        • Research Site
      • Braunau, Austria, 5280
        • Research Site
      • Dornbirn, Austria, 6850
        • Research Site
      • Feldkirch, Austria, 6807
        • Research Site
      • Gmunden, Austria, 4810
        • Research Site
      • Graz, Austria, 8036
        • Research Site
      • Graz, Austria, 8020
        • Research Site
      • Güssing, Austria, 7540
        • Research Site
      • Hall in Tirol, Austria, 6060
        • Research Site
      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Research Site
      • Klagenfurt, Austria, 9026
        • Research Site
      • Krems, Austria, 3500
        • Research Site
      • Kufstein, Austria, 6330
        • Research Site
      • Leoben, Austria, 8700
        • Research Site
      • Lienz, Austria, 9900
        • Research Site
      • Linz, Austria, 4010
        • Research Site
      • Linz, Austria, 4020
        • Research Site
      • Oberpullendorf, Austria, 7350
        • Research Site
      • Ried, Austria, 4910
        • Research Site
      • Rottenmann, Austria, 8786
        • Research Site
      • Salzburg, Austria, 5020
        • Research Site
      • Schärding, Austria, 4780
        • Research Site
      • St Poelten, Austria, 3100
        • Research Site
      • St Veit an der Glan, Austria, 9300
        • Research Site
      • St. Poelten, Austria, 3100
        • Research Site
      • Steyr, Austria, 4400
        • Research Site
      • Villach, Austria, 9500
        • Research Site
      • Villach, Austria, 9504
        • Research Site
      • Voecklabruck, Austria, 4840
        • Research Site
      • Weiz, Austria, 8160
        • Research Site
      • Wels, Austria, 4600
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1130
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1090
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1220
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1140
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1160
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1180
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1020
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1010
        • Research Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1050
        • Research Site
      • Wiener Neustadt, Austria, 2700
        • Research Site
      • Wolfsberg, Austria, 9400
        • Research Site
      • Gävle, Sweden, 801 87
        • Research Site
      • Göteborg, Sweden
        • Research Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
        • Research Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 112 81
        • Research Site
      • Uppsala, Sweden, 751 85
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Double Blinded Phase:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast;
  • Female subjects with non-metastatic disease who are estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, and who have completed their treatment pathway;
  • Subjects who are currently on, or will initiate an approved non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy (eg, anastrazole) in the adjuvant setting;
  • Postmenopausal woman, defined as a woman fulfilling any one of the following criteria:

    • Having undergone a bilateral oophorectomy;
    • Age ≥ 60 years;
    • Aged < 60 years meeting the following requirements:
  • Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol in the postmenopausal range;
  • A negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to randomization. Subjects who have undergone a hysterectomy do not require a pregnancy test.
  • More criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria for Double Blinded Phase:

  • Aromatase inhibitor therapy for more than 24 months;
  • Prior or concurrent treatment with Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (eg, tamoxifen);
  • Evidence of metastatic disease;
  • Current or prior intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate administration;
  • Oral bisphosphonate treatment greater than or equal to 3 years continuously OR greater than 3 months but less than 3 years unless there was a washout period of at least 1 year prior to randomization OR any use during the 3-month period prior to randomization;
  • Prior administration of denosumab;
  • Known liver or renal deficiency;
  • Recurrence of the primary malignancy (e.g., during the allowed interval of pretreatment with aromatase inhibitor);
  • Diagnosis of any second non-breast malignancy within the last 5 years, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, or for in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri;
  • Any kind of disorder that compromises the ability to give written informed consent and/or comply with study procedures.

Inclusion Criteria to Receive Open-label Phase Denosumab:

  • Obtain signed and dated written informed consent prior to performing any study-specific procedure;
  • Subjects currently taking an approved non-steroidal AIT (eg, anastrazole) or who have completed or discontinued AIT within 12 months prior to participation in the OLP;
  • Randomized to placebo arm during the double-blind phase (as determined by unblinding procedures);

Exclusion Criteria to Receive Open-label Phase Denosumab:

  • Current or prior IV bisphosphonate administration;
  • Subjects meeting the following criteria for oral bisphosphonate treatment:

    • Greater than or equal to 3 years continuously,
    • Greater than 3 months but less than 3 years unless subject has had a washout period of at least 1 year prior to participation in the OLP,
    • Any use during the 3-month period prior to participation in the OLP;
  • Prior or concurrent treatment with SERMs (eg, tamoxifen);
  • Subjects who ended treatment with investigational product (IP) prematurely in the double-blind phase; Treatment with commercial denosumab (Prolia or Xgeva) prior to participation in the OLP.

Eligibility for ZA substudy Inclusion Criteria

  • Obtain signed and dated written informed consent prior to performing any substudy-specific procedure
  • Subjects that received OLP denosumab and completed OLP treatment
  • Last OLP denosumab administration no longer than 9 months ago Exclusion Criteria
  • Current or prior ZA administration.
  • Subjects who ended treatment with investigational product (IP) prematurely in the double-blind phase and OL phase
  • Known sensitivity or intolerance to any of the products to be administered during the substudy (eg, ZA, calcium or vitamin D)
  • Known history of any of the following conditions either by subject self report or chart review

    • Paget's disease (bone), Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia or other active metabolic bone disease
    • Known history of hypocalcemia
    • Major surgery, or significant traumatic injury occurring within 4 weeks prior to randomization
    • Parathyroid glands in neck surgically removed.
    • Any sections of intestine removed.
    • Known human immunodeficiency virus infection
    • Active infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus
  • Known liver or renal disease as determined by the investigator and indicated by the following criteria:

    • Aspartate aminotransferase ≥ 2.5 x ULN
    • Alanine transaminase ≥ 2.5 x ULN
    • Serum creatinine ≥ 2 x ULN
    • Creatine clearance < 35ml/min Subjects that are pregnant or breastfeeding
    • All subjects with reproductive potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days before randomization
  • Subjects who are osteoporotic in baseline BMD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Denosumab
Participants received 60 mg denosumab subcutaneous injection once every 6 months. All participants continued to receive an approved non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy.
Administered as a subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • Prolia®
An approved non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy (eg, anastrazole) in the adjuvant setting
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection once every 6 months. All participants continued to receive an approved non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy.
Other Names:
  • Administered as a subcutaneous injection
An approved non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy (eg, anastrazole) in the adjuvant setting
Experimental: SubStudy: Zoledronic Acid
Eligible participants who completed the open-label phase could be enrolled into the zoledronic acid substudy and randomized to receive a single 5 mg intravenous dose of zoledronic acid 8 months after the last open-label dose of denosumab.
5 mg zoledronic acid administered at a constant infusion rate
Other Names:
  • Reclast
  • Zometa
Other: Substudy: Standard of Care
Eligible participants who completed the open-label phase could be enrolled into the zoledronic acid substudy and randomized to receive standard of care 8 months after the last open-label dose of denosumab.
Standard of care (SoC) as recommended by the treating physician, depending on individual factors such as bone density, lifestyle recommendations by the Investigator such as diet, physical activities and sun exposure, as well as local treatment standards.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to First Clinical Fracture
Time Frame: From randomization until the primary analysis cut-off date of 26 March 2014; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 87 months
The time to first on-study clinical fracture was defined as the number of days from randomization to the date of the x-ray confirming the clinical fracture. A clinical fracture is any clinically evident fracture with associated symptoms and confirmed by x-ray. Participants who died or withdrew without experiencing a clinical fracture were censored at the date of last contact or study termination whichever was earlier.
From randomization until the primary analysis cut-off date of 26 March 2014; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 87 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36 at Pre-selected Sites
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Bone mineral density was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry.
Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected Sites
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Bone mineral density was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry.
Baseline and Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected Sites
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36
Bone mineral density was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry.
Baseline and Month 36
Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: 36 months

Assessment of vertebral fractures was performed by an expert radiologist at the central imaging center using a semiquantitative grading scale: Grade 1, 20% to 25% reduction in vertebral height (anterior, middle, or posterior); Grade 2, 25% to 40% reduction in height; Grade 3, greater than 40% reduction in height.

A new vertebral fracture was defined as a fracture in a previously undeformed vertebrae including new compression fractures, defined as those compression fractures having a decrease in total anterior or posterior height of at least 25% from baseline. New vertebral fractures includes morphometric vertebral fractures identified from on study x-rays and clinical vertebral fractures confirmed by x-rays.

36 months
Number of Participants With New or Worsening Vertebral Fractures
Time Frame: 36 months

Assessment of vertebral fractures was performed by an expert radiologist at the central imaging center using a semiquantitative grading scale: Grade 1, 20% to 25% reduction in vertebral height (anterior, middle, or posterior); Grade 2, 25% to 40% reduction in height; Grade 3, greater than 40% reduction in height.

A new vertebral fracture was defined as a fracture in a previously undeformed vertebrae including new compression fractures, defined as those compression fractures having a decrease in total anterior or posterior height of at least 25% from baseline. New vertebral fractures includes morphometric vertebral fractures identified from on study x-rays and clinical vertebral fractures confirmed by x-rays. Worsening of pre-existing fractures was defined as an increase in fracture severity of at least 1 grade on the semiquantitative scale.

36 months
Disease-free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: From randomization until the DFS data cut-off date of 15 September 2015; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 102 months
DFS was defined as the time interval from the randomization date to the date of first evidence of local or distant metastases, contra-lateral breast cancer, secondary carcinoma, or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). Participants last known to be alive, who did not experience recurrence of disease, were censored at their last contact date or at the data cut-off date whichever came first.
From randomization until the DFS data cut-off date of 15 September 2015; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 102 months
Bone Metastases-free Survival (BMFS)
Time Frame: From randomization until end of main study, maximum time on main study was 152 months
BMFS was defined as the time interval from randomization to first occurrence of bone metastasis or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Participants last known to be alive, who did not experience bone metastasis, were censored at their last assessment (i.e., bone scan) date or at the last contact date, whichever comes first.
From randomization until end of main study, maximum time on main study was 152 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Randomization until end of main study, maximum duration of main study was 152 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Randomization until end of main study, maximum duration of main study was 152 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: MD, Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 18, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 7, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

November 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe