- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00597727
A Study of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Peanut-allergic Children (SLB)
A Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study of Peanut Sublingual Immunotherapy in Children - DBPC Peanut SLIT
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In spite of increased recognition and understanding of food allergies, food-induced anaphylaxis remains the single most common cause of anaphylaxis seen in hospital emergency departments, accounting for about one third of anaphylaxis cases seen. It is estimated that about 30,000 food-induced anaphylactic events are seen in U.S. emergency departments each year and that about 200 fatal cases occur in the U.S. each year. Either peanuts or tree nuts cause more than 80% of these reactions. No treatments are available and avoidance is the only approved intervention.
The goal of this study is to investigate peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) as a treatment for children with peanut allergy. This study is primarily designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of peanut SLIT compared to placebo after 12 months. Secondarily, the study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of extended maintenance dosing of peanut SLIT in inducing lasting tolerance after discontinuation of the peanut SLIT. Mechanistic studies will be completed concurrently as exploratory endpoints to understand changes in the allergic immune response related to peanut SLIT.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- University of North Carolina
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Peanut IgE > 7kU/L (> 2kU/L for children aged 2 years and under) AND
- History of significant clinical symptoms within 60 minutes after the ingestion of peanuts.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of severe life-threatening anaphylaxis to peanut, OR
- Medical history that would prevent a DBPCFC to peanut, OR
- Subjects with wheat or oat allergy (which are used in the placebo), OR
- Unable to cooperate with challenge procedures, OR
- Unable to be reached by telephone for follow-up
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Blinded Peanut SLIT
Blinded subjects who received peanut sublingual drops for the initial 12 month blinded phase of the study.
|
Liquid peanut protein drops diluted in glycerin which are dosed under the tongue.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Blinded Placebo SLIT
Blinded subjects who received placebo sublingual drops for the initial 12 month blinded phase of the study.
|
Liquid glycerin without peanut which are dosed under the tongue.
Other Names:
|
Other: Ext. maint. open label peanut SLIT
After completing the blinded phase of the study, subjects receiving Blinded Peanut SLIT continued on extended maintenance open-label peanut SLIT for the duration of the study.
Subjects receiving Blinded Placebo SLIT were crossed over and underwent the 12 month buildup protocol on open label peanut SLIT and then continued on extended maintenance treatment for the duration of the study.
|
Liquid peanut protein drops diluted in glycerin which are dosed under the tongue.
Other Names:
|
Other: Early unblinded peanut SLIT
Subjects who were unblinded prematurely during the blinded phase of the study and then re-enrolled as an open label cohort.
|
Liquid peanut protein drops diluted in glycerin which are dosed under the tongue.
Other Names:
|
Other: Pilot peanut SLIT rollover cohort
Subjects from the original phase 1 study of peanut SLIT (NCT00429429) who were rolled over into the current protocol as an open label peanut SLIT cohort.
|
Liquid peanut protein drops diluted in glycerin which are dosed under the tongue.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Subjects Who Can Tolerate the Peanut Oral Food Challenge After 12 Months of Peanut SLIT Dosing
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Upon completion of 12 months of peanut SLIT treatment, subjects underwent a double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to assess desensitization (an increase in reaction threshold while on therapy).
A DBPCFC involves the ingestion of small increasing amounts of peanut up to a cumulative total amount.
The primary clinical efficacy outcome of the study was the percentage of peanut allergic subjects who completed a 2500 mg peanut protein DBPCFC without developing symptoms after 12 months of peanut SLIT therapy.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Subjects Tolerating a Peanut Oral Food Challenge 2-4 Weeks After Discontining Peanut SLIT Dosing
Time Frame: 36-60 months
|
Upon completion of 36-60 months of peanut SLIT treatment, subjects underwent a double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to assess desensitization (an increase in reaction threshold while on therapy).
A DBPCFC involves the ingestion of small increasing amounts of peanut up to a cumulative total amount.
Peanut SLIT therapy was then discontinued for 2-4 weeks to assess for persistence of the desensitization response called sustained unresponsiveness (SU).
The secondary clinical efficacy outcome of the study was the percentage of peanut allergic subjects who completed a 5000 mg peanut protein DBPCFC without developing symptoms 2-4 weeks after discontinuing peanut SLIT therapy.
|
36-60 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chin SJ, Vickery BP, Kulis MD, Kim EH, Varshney P, Steele P, Kamilaris J, Hiegel AM, Carlisle SK, Smith PB, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Burks AW. Sublingual versus oral immunotherapy for peanut-allergic children: a retrospective comparison. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug;132(2):476-8.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Mar 25. No abstract available.
- Kim EH, Bird JA, Kulis M, Laubach S, Pons L, Shreffler W, Steele P, Kamilaris J, Vickery B, Burks AW. Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):640-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1083. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
- Kulis M, Saba K, Kim EH, Bird JA, Kamilaris N, Vickery BP, Staats H, Burks AW. Increased peanut-specific IgA levels in saliva correlate with food challenge outcomes after peanut sublingual immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr;129(4):1159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.045. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11-2296
- 5R01AT004435-09 (NIH)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Food Hypersensitivity
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaTerminated
-
University Hospital, AngersUnknown
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Harvard School... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHypersensitivity | Peanut Hypersensitivity | Peanut Allergy | Food Allergy | Hypersensitivity, FoodUnited States
-
University of ZurichRecruitingHypersensitivity, FoodSwitzerland
-
Prollergy dba Ready Set FoodObvioHealthNot yet recruitingFood Allergy in Infants
-
Ruijin HospitalRecruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruiting
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Enrolling by invitationFood Allergy Peanut | Food Allergy in InfantsUnited States
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUnknown
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknown
Clinical Trials on Peanut SLIT
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedFood Hypersensitivity | Peanut Hypersensitivity | Peanut Allergy | Food AllergyUnited States
-
ALK-Abelló A/SParexelRecruitingPeanut AllergyUnited States, Canada
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Consortium of Food Allergy ResearchCompletedHypersensitivity | Food Hypersensitivity | Peanut Hypersensitivity | Immediate HypersensitivityUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH); University... and other collaboratorsCompletedFood Hypersensitivity | Peanut Hypersensitivity | Peanut Allergy | Food AllergyUnited States
-
SanofiCompleted
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Completed
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiWithdrawnPeanut Allergy | Food Allergy
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompleted
-
ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoALK-Abelló A/SCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillTerminated