Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System (RCH)

October 10, 2022 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Post Approval Study: Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System

This Post-Approval study is prospective follow-up study designed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This Post-Approval study is prospective follow-up study designed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System. Randomized Non-inflammatory Arthritis, Randomized Inflammatory and Continued Access Cohorts patients previously enrolled in the IDE study will be evaluated annually through five (5) year follow-up. In addition, all patients enrolled in the original study cohorts as well as the continued access patients will be sent a letter questionnaire annually at the 6-10 year postoperative time point to assess the patient's general well-being and if the study components are still in place

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

456

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Medical College of Georgia, Department of Orthopaedics
    • Michigan
      • Flint, Michigan, United States, 48507
        • Family Orthopaedics
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • Hospital of Joint Disease, Orthopaedic Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104-2699
        • Presbyterian Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38104
        • The Memphis Orthopaedic Group, PC
    • Texas
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
        • University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Orthopaedics and Rehab
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05405
        • University of Vermont College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

(Patient must meet all of the following characteristics to be enrolled in the study):

  • Males and females, 21 to 80 years of age, inclusive;
  • Primary diagnosis of non-inflammatory arthritis (osteoarthritis) or inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis), or patients requiring a revision as specified previously;
  • The patient or his/her legal guardian is willing to consent to participate in the study by signing and dating the approved consent form;
  • The patient will be available for follow-up through at least two years postoperative;
  • The patient has met an acceptable preoperative medical clearance and is free or treated for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, etc., conditions that would pose excessive operative risk (FDA requirement);
  • The patient has a total Harris Hip Score of less than or equal to 60 (FDA requirement);
  • The patient meets none of the exclusion criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

(Patient with any of the following characteristics must be excluded from the study):

  • Patients known to have insufficient quantity or quality of bone support resulting from Conditions such as cancer, femoral osteotomy, Girdlestone resection, significant osteoporosis or metabolic disorders of calcified tissues. Patients with physical conditions tending to place extreme loads on implants such as morbid obesity (> 100 pounds over desirable body weight), Charcot joints, muscle deficiencies, or multiple joint disabilities;
  • Patients with active localized or systemic infection;
  • Patients who have not reached full skeletal maturity;
  • Patient psychological or neurological conditions which tend to preempt the patient's ability or willingness to restrict activities or follow medical advice, especially during the postoperative period, e.g.: drug or alcohol abuse, serious mental illness or retardation, or general neurological conditions;
  • The patient is participating in any other pharmaceutical, biologic or medical device clinical investigation;
  • Immunosuppressive disorders - immunosuppressive disorders are chronic conditions characterized by markedly inhibited ability to respond to antigenic stimuli. Examples of such conditions include patients who are on immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroid hormones in large amounts, cytotoxic drugs, antilymphocytic serum or irradiation in large doses), patients receiving therapy to prevent homograft rejection, patients who have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or auto-immune diseases (except rheumatoid arthritis).
  • Pregnancy.
  • Patients with known sensitivity to materials in the device.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Reflection Ceramic-Ceramic Hip System (IP)
Investigational: Reflection Ceramic-Ceramic Hip System. Ceramic femoral head component and the ceramic acetabular cup insert are composed of Biolox forte aluminum oxide material.
Intervention: all patients in study required (intervention) a total hip replacement, and were randomized to receive either the (Study Device)Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System or the(Control Device) Reflection FSO V (5 hole)acetabular system. Both arms received either a Synergy porous coated or Spectron EF stem.
Other Names:
  • Hip Replacement
  • Reflection
  • ceramic-ceramic
Active Comparator: Reflection FSO V (5 hole) (Control)
Control: Reflection FSO V (5 hole). Acetabular shell with a ultra high molecular weight polyethylene insert and an alumina ceramic femoral head with a Synergy or Spectron EF femoral stem. The Synergy femoral stem are composed of implant grade titanium while the Spectron EF stem is composed of implant grade cobalt chrome.
Intervention: all patients in study required (intervention) a total hip replacement, and were randomized to receive either the (Study Device)Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System or the(Control Device) Reflection FSO V (5 hole)acetabular system. Both arms received either a Synergy porous coated or Spectron EF stem.
Other Names:
  • Hip replacement
  • Reflection
  • ceramic-poly

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival of Hip Implant Based on Number of Hips Requiring Revision
Time Frame: Postoperatively through Year 10

Revisions were assessed cumulatively from Initial Study Period through Post-Approval Study Period and End of Study/Withdrawal. Implant survival was analyzed based on the number of hip revisions that occurred as well as the cohort for each study arm (IP and Control), but further categorized by cohorts within each arm:

RNIA = randomized, non-inflammatory arthritis cohort (IP or Control) RIA = randomized, inflammatory arthritis cohort (IP or Control) RR = revision cohort (IP or Control) CAC = continued access cohort (IP only)

Postoperatively through Year 10
Survival of Hip Implant Based on Time Until Revision Required
Time Frame: Postoperatively through Year 10

The survival of the implant was analyzed based on the length of time postoperatively until hip revision surgery was required (cumulatively through Initial Study Period and Post-Approval Study Period) for participants who required a revision surgery during the course of the study.

The study arms were further categorized by cohorts within each arm:

RNIA = randomized, non-inflammatory arthritis cohort (IP or Control) RIA = randomized, inflammatory arthritis cohort (IP or Control) RR = revision cohort (IP or Control) CAC = continued access cohort (IP only)

Postoperatively through Year 10
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Year 6 through Year 10 postoperatively

A subject satisfaction questionnaire was conducted at Year 6, Year 7, Year 8, Year 9, and Year 10 postoperatively. The questionnaire was mailed to enrolled subjects each year (Years 6-10).

The question was asked "Are you satisfied with hip?" and subjects responded either "yes" or "no".

Year 6 through Year 10 postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott Corpe, M.D., Medical College of Georgia, Dept of Orthopaedic
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Zuckerman, M.D., Hospital of Joint Disease, Orthopaedic Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan P Garino, M.D., Presbyterian Medical Center, Dept of Orthopaedic
  • Principal Investigator: Michael J Grecula, M.D., University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Orthopaedic
  • Principal Investigator: James Howe, M.D., University of Vermont
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Lynch, M.D., The Memphis Orthopaedic Group, PC
  • Principal Investigator: Norman E Walter, M.D., Family Orthopaedics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe