- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00683254
Analysis of Impact on Nasal Obstruction by Commercially Available Internal Nasal Stents
May 10, 2017 updated by: Bethany L. Jones
Commercially-available internal nasal stents placed inside the nostril should produce decreased nasal obstruction detectable subjectively (volunteers will fill out a survey) and objectively (degree of obstruction will be measured with a rhinomanometer which measure resistant of airflow while breathing through nose).
Study Overview
Status
Withdrawn
Conditions
Detailed Description
Nasal rhinomanometry provides a measure of the airflow through the nose during inspiration and expiration.
The effect of static obstructions, such as septal deviation, as well as dynamic obstructions, such as lateral nasal wall collapse, can be measured by the rhinomanometer.
The effect of commercially available nasal stents on nasal airflow will be measured.
In subjects chosen from the general population, some of whom may not complain of nasal obstruction, the airflow will be measured before and after the placement of removable nasal silastic stents.
In addition, these subjects will complete a one question scale in the Likert model to rate the degree of their subjective nasal obstruction; they will complete this both before and after placement of the stents.
The results of the scale before and after application of the stents will be correlated with the objective measurements of airflow by rhinomanometry taken before and after stent insertion.Several studies have measured the effect of external nasal splints (such as Breathe-Rite strips) on nasal airflow and nasal airway size (as measured by acoustic rhinometry), but few have studied internal nasal stents.
No studies have correlated rhinomanometric evaluation of effect on nasal obstruction by nasal stents with the validated NOSE survey (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation).
In patients with a chief complaint of nasal obstruction and who are noted to have anterior nasal obstruction, nasal stents may provide a satisfactory improvement in nasal airflow without surgical or medicinal intervention.
For patients who are determined to be candidates for surgical intervention, the surgical procedure is tailored to their specific anatomic deformities, as determined by the staff facial plastic surgeon.
While the patient's complaint of nasal obstruction as well as the surgeon's assessment of the nasal anatomy are important components in the determination of the need for surgical intervention, no studies have utilized the validated NOSE instrument of subjective complaint of nasal obstruction combined with objective measurements of dynamic airflow.
Rhinomanometric measurements can be used to further validate the NOSE instrument both preoperatively and postoperatively.
Study Type
Observational
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- University of Iowa Department of Otolaryngology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Our subject pool will be comprised of healthy volunteers, at least 18 years of age, who have not had nasal surgery, are not currently using a topical decongestant, topical nasal steroid spray, or over the counter decongestant, and have no history of recurrent epistaxis or a running nosebleed within 2 weeks prior to data collection.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of nasal surgery, currently using topical nasal steroid spray, over the counter decongestant, history of recurrent epistaxis or history of nosebleed within 2 weeks prior to data collection, currently pregnant
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
change in resistance to airflow after stents inserted as measured by rhinomanometer
Time Frame: data collection occurs at one time only, takes less than 5 minutes to record
|
data collection occurs at one time only, takes less than 5 minutes to record
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
subjective decrease in nasal obstruction after stents placed recorded by volunteers filling out a survey
Time Frame: recorded at time of stent placement, one time only
|
recorded at time of stent placement, one time only
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bethany L Jones, MD, University of Iowa Department of Otolaryngology
- Study Director: Grant Hamilton, MD, University of Iowa Department of Otolaryngology
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lam DJ, James KT, Weaver EM. Comparison of anatomic, physiological, and subjective measures of the nasal airway. Am J Rhinol. 2006 Sep-Oct;20(5):463-70. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2940.
- Wong LS, Johnson AT. Decrease of resistance to air flow with nasal strips as measured with the airflow perturbation device. Biomed Eng Online. 2004 Oct 22;3(1):38. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-3-38.
- Suzina AH, Hamzah M, Samsudin AR. Objective assessment of nasal resistance in patients with nasal disease. J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Aug;117(8):609-13. doi: 10.1258/002221503768199933.
- Huang TW, Cheng PW. Changes in nasal resistance and quality of life after endoscopic microdebrider-assisted inferior turbinoplasty in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Sep;132(9):990-3. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.9.990.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
August 1, 2008
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
August 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 22, 2008
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 23, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
May 11, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 10, 2017
Last Verified
May 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Sanostec-200701751
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.