Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (REALISTIC)

July 4, 2018 updated by: UCB Pharma

A Phase IIIb Multicenter Study With a 12-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Period Followed by an Open-label, Extension Phase Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Given to Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

This is a Phase IIIb multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) administered to patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The treatment period starts with a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized period followed by an open-label extension phase. In the double-blind phase, eligible patients are randomized (4:1 ratio) to receive either certolizumab pegol (CZP) or Placebo up to and including Week 10. The randomization will be stratified according to the three factors: concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX, Yes or No), prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) use (Yes or No), and disease duration categories (< 2 years or ≥ 2 years). From Week 12 all patients remaining in the study receive open-label CZP for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1648

Phase

  • Phase 3

Expanded Access

Available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Calgary, Canada
      • Mississauga, Canada
      • Newmarket, Canada
      • Sainte Foy, Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
      • Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
      • London, Ontario, Canada
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
      • Windsor, Ontario, Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
      • Rimouski, Quebec, Canada
      • Trois-Rivires, Quebec, Canada
      • Amiens, France
      • Cahors, France
      • Corbeil Essonnes, France
      • Dreux, France
      • Lievin, France
      • Montpellier, France
      • Mulhouse, France
      • Nantes, France
      • Orleans, France
      • Paris, France
      • Pierre-Benite, France
      • Rennes, France
      • Saint Priest en Jarez, France
      • Bad Neuenahr, Germany
      • Baden, Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Chemnitz, Germany
      • Dresden, Germany
      • Duisburg, Germany
      • Erfurt, Germany
      • Erlangen, Germany
      • Freiburg, Germany
      • Friedrichroda, Germany
      • Goslar, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Hildesheim, Germany
      • Hoyerswerda, Germany
      • Jena, Germany
      • Kiel, Germany
      • Koln, Germany
      • Leipzig, Germany
      • Mainz, Germany
      • Munchen, Germany
      • Neuss, Germany
      • Osnabruck, Germany
      • Rostock, Germany
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
      • Zerbst, Germany
      • Bologna, Italy
      • Genova, Italy
      • Jesi, Italy
      • Modena, Italy
      • Palermo, Italy
      • Pisa, Italy
      • Prato, Italy
      • Siena, Italy
      • Udine, Italy
      • Apeldoorn, Netherlands
      • Arnhem, Netherlands
      • Den-Haag, Netherlands
      • Leiden, Netherlands
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Coruna, Spain
      • La Laguna, Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
      • Murcia, Spain
      • Oviedo, Spain
      • Pontevedra, Spain
      • Sabadell, Spain
      • Salamanca, Spain
      • Santander, Spain
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
      • Torrelavega, Spain
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
      • Montgomery, Alabama, United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
    • California
      • Fullerton, California, United States
      • La Jolla, California, United States
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Palm Desert, California, United States
      • Sacramento, California, United States
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States
      • Santa Maria, California, United States
      • Tustin, California, United States
      • Westlake Village, California, United States
      • Whittier, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
    • Connecticut
      • Danbury, Connecticut, United States
      • Trumbull, Connecticut, United States
    • Delaware
      • Lewes, Delaware, United States
      • Newark, Delaware, United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
      • South Miami, Florida, United States
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
      • Tavares, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    • Idaho
      • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
    • Illinois
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States
      • Rock Island, Illinois, United States
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States
    • Indiana
      • Evansville, Indiana, United States
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
    • Louisiana
      • Covington, Louisiana, United States
      • Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
      • Columbia, Maryland, United States
      • Frederick, Maryland, United States
      • Wheaton, Maryland, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
      • Fall River, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Battle Creek, Michigan, United States
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States
      • Petoskey, Michigan, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Duluth, Minnesota, United States
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
      • Voorhees, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States
      • Bronx, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
      • Orchard Park, New York, United States
      • Rochester, New York, United States
      • Roslyn, New York, United States
      • Smithtown, New York, United States
      • Syracuse, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
      • Monroe, North Carolina, United States
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States
      • Fairfield, Ohio, United States
      • Mayfield, Ohio, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Wexford, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Amarillo, Texas, United States
      • Austin, Texas, United States
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States
      • Houston, Texas, United States
      • Lubbock, Texas, United States
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
      • Sugar Land, Texas, United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    • Virginia
      • Newport News, Virginia, United States
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States
      • Yakima, Washington, United States
    • West Virginia
      • Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Glendale, Wisconsin, United States
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
      • Monroe, Wisconsin, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient with established moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All concomitant diseases or pathological conditions that could interfere and impact the assessment of the study treatment
  • Previous clinical trials and previous biological therapy that could interfere with the results in the present clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo (0.9% saline) given as 2 subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by placebo given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
Experimental: Certolizumab pegol (CZP)
400 mg CZP given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
Other Names:
  • Cimzia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration < 2 Years
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration ≥ 2 Years.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
Week 12
SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
Week 12
CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
Week 12
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change from baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of Week 12 value divided by baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
Baseline, Week 12
Time to Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The time from randomization to sustained ACR20 response at 2 consecutive visits (at the latest on Week 12).
Baseline up to Week 12
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
EULAR response (good response, moderate response, or no response) is defined based on the present value and improvement from baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein)].
Baseline, Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Baseline, Week 28
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Baseline, Week 28
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 28
Time Frame: Week 28
DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Week 28
SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 28
Time Frame: Week 28
SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Week 28
CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 28
Time Frame: Week 28
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
Week 28
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change from Baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of the value at Week 28 divided by Baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28
Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
Baseline, Week 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe