Randomised Trial Comparing Metal and Plastic Biliary Stents Stents for Palliating Malignant Jaundice

August 5, 2008 updated by: University of Cape Town

Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing Metal and Plastic Stents in Palliation of Symptomatic Jaundice

Background:

When considering any malignancy with limited life expectancy, palliation and quality of life are paramount. Owing to the limited centres offering ERCP and endoscopic palliation in the South African state sector, patients often travel vast distances and spend large amounts of time away from family and social support structures, severely impairing their quality of life. Stent occlusion with resultant readmission to an ERCP accredited centre obviously compounds this problem.

The hypothesis we propose to test is whether metal stents as a primary procedure result in better patency rates, are more cost effective and improve quality of life than plastic stents. We propose to do this by means of a randomised trial determining the best method of palliation for inoperable distal common bile duct malignancies in the South African context.

Primary end-point Assessing the cost of metal versus plastic stenting in inoperable malignant distal common bile duct strictures in patients with expected survival of 3 months or more as palliation of symptomatic obstructive jaundice. Cost to be assessed in terms of hardware, hospital stay and readmissions for stent occlusion(patency) and complications Secondary end-point Assessing quality of life using a validated scoring system(EORTC QLQ 30) in patients receiving a metal or plastic biliary stent as definitive means of palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice

Hypothesis to be tested Metal stents are superior to plastic stents in terms of patency, resulting in more cost effective palliation of inoperable malignant jaundice and better quality of life due to fewer stent occlusions/episodes of cholangitis.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7925
        • Recruiting
        • Groote Schuur Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • John M Shaw, MBBCH,FCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic jaundice secondary to malignant distal CBD stricture
  • Contra-indication to resection (advanced disease/advanced age/poor surgical risk)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hilar/proximal CBD obstruction
  • ECOG performance status 3 or 4
  • Duodenal obstruction
  • Previous stent placement
  • Inability to comply with follow-up
  • Ascites and liver metastases
  • Not possible to stent endoscopically

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SEMS
Self expanding metal stent compared to plastic stent. Both recognised forms of treatment for condition
Comparing plastic and metal stents
Other Names:
  • Boston Scientific
  • biliary self-expanding metal stent
  • olympus plastic stent
Active Comparator: Plastic stent
Comparing plastic and metal stents
Other Names:
  • Boston Scientific
  • biliary self-expanding metal stent
  • olympus plastic stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall cost comparison of metal versus plastic stent in patients with limited life expectancy
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John M Shaw, FCS, MMed, University of Cape Town

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2009

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2008

Last Verified

May 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 144/2007

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biliary Obstruction

Clinical Trials on SEMS

3
Subscribe