Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of NAFT-500 in Tinea Pedis

April 19, 2013 updated by: Merz North America, Inc.

A Phase 3 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Parallel Group Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of NAFT-500 in Subjects With Tinea Pedis

A research study to compare the safety and effectiveness of an investigational medication called NAFT-500 to placebo, when used in subjects with tinea pedis (athlete's foot).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAFT-500 compared to placebo in the treatment of subjects with potassium hydroxide (KOH) and culture positive symptomatic tinea pedis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

707

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35209
        • Radiant Research
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90010-3209
        • Dr. Felix Sigal
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • University of California San Francisco, Dept of Dermatology
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33175
        • FXM Research
      • Miramar, Florida, United States, 33027
        • FXM Research
    • Illinois
      • Buffalo Grove, Illinois, United States, 60089
        • Glazer Dermatology
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Tulane University Health Services
    • Michigan
      • Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States, 48439
        • Silverton Skin Institute
    • North Carolina
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Zoe Draelos, MD
    • Ohio
      • Euclid, Ohio, United States, 44118
        • Haber Dermatology
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
        • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • Paddington Testing Company
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine
    • South Carolina
      • Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
        • Coastal Carolina Research Center
    • Texas
      • College Station, Texas, United States, 77845
        • J & S Studies
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75234
        • Research Across America
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • Research Across America

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Review and sign a statement of Informed Consent and HIPAA authorization.
  2. For minors (less than 18 years), the parent/legal guardian must complete the informed consent process AND the subject must complete the assent process and sign the appropriate form (if age appropriate).
  3. Males or non-pregnant females ≥12 years of age, of any race or sex. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test.
  4. Presence of tinea pedis on one or both feet characterized by clinical evidence of a tinea infection (at least moderate erythema, moderate scaling, and mild pruritus)based on signs and symptoms.
  5. KOH positive and culture positive baseline skin scrapings obtained from the site most severely affected or a representative site of the overall severity.
  6. Subjects must be in good health and free from any clinically significant disease that might interfere with the study evaluations.
  7. Subject must be able to understand the requirements of the study and willing to comply with the study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A life-threatening condition (ex. autoimmune deficiency syndrome, cancer, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction) within the last 6 months.
  2. Subjects with abnormal findings - physical or laboratory - that are considered by the investigator to be clinically important and indicative of conditions that might complicate interpretation of study results.
  3. Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to study medications or their components.
  4. Subjects who have a recent history or who are currently known to abuse alcohol or drugs.
  5. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  6. Hemodialysis or chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis therapy.
  7. Current diagnosis of immunocompromising conditions.
  8. Foot psoriasis, corns and/or callus involving any web spaces, atopic or contact dermatitis.
  9. Severe dermatophytoses, onychomycosis (on the evaluated foot), mucocutaneous candidiasis, or bacterial skin infection.
  10. Extremely severe tinea pedis (incapacitating).
  11. Female subject who is pregnant or lactating, who is not using or does not agree to use an acceptable form of contraception during the study, or who intends to become pregnant during the study (females who are surgically sterilized or post menopausal for at least 2 years are not considered to be of childbearing potential).For the purposes of this study, acceptable forms of birth control include: oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches/implants, double barrier methods (e.g., use of condom and spermicide), IUD, and abstinence with second acceptable method should subject become sexually active.
  12. Subjects using the following medications:

    • Topical anti-fungal therapy, foot/shoe powders, or topical corticosteroids applied to the feet within 14 days prior to randomization. Topical terbinafine, butenafine,and naftifine within 30 days prior to randomization
    • Oral anti-fungal therapies 3 months (8 months for oral terbinafine) prior to randomization
    • Systemic antibiotic or corticosteroid treatment within 30 days of randomization
    • Any other significant treatments, except hormonal contraception and multivitamin, at the discretion of the investigator that would interfere with study treatment.
    • Investigational drug within 30 days of randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Naftin 2% cream applied daily for 2 weeks
topical cream 1 application every day up to 4 weeks weeks
Placebo Comparator: 2
Placebo cream applied daily for two weeks
placebo cream 1 application every day for up to 4 weeks
Active Comparator: 3
Active comparator applied daily for 4 weeks
topical allylamine cream applied once a day for up to 4 weeks
Placebo Comparator: 4
placebo cream applied daily for 4 weeks
topical placebo cream applied once a day for up to 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects With Complete Cure at Week 6.
Time Frame: Week 6

The first primary efficacy variable was the percentage of subjects in the NAFT-500 Cream, 2% or 2-week placebo groups with complete cure at Week 6.

The second primary efficacy variable was the percentage of subjects in the Naftin 1% Cream or 4-week placebo groups with complete cure at Week 6.

Complete cure was defined as negative mycology results from the central laboratory (dermatophyte culture and KOH) and absence of erythema, scaling, and pruritus that were evaluated using a 4 point severity scale.

Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects With Mycological Cure and Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Effectiveness at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Mycological Cure was defined as negative KOH result and negative dermatophyte culture at Week 6. Treatment Effectiveness was defined as negative KOH, negative culture, and Scaling, Erythema, and Pruritus grades of 0 or 1 at Week 6.
Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lawrence Parish, MD, Paddington Testing Company

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

September 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 26, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe