Improving Laboratory Monitoring in Community Practices: A Randomized Trial (LabMon)

September 19, 2012 updated by: Steven Simon, VA Boston Healthcare System
The investigators propose a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) of computerized point-of-care alerts in the EHR to prevent errors related to laboratory monitoring at the initiation and continuation of drug therapy and a results management system to prevent errors related to the delay in follow-up of abnormal laboratory testing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Medication errors and preventable adverse drug events occur commonly among patients in the ambulatory setting and constitute an important target for patient safety and quality improvement. Laboratory monitoring to ensure the safety and effectiveness of drug therapy and the timely management of abnormal results of laboratory testing have been increasingly recognized as important areas for improving patient safety in ambulatory care. Promising interventions have been developed for practices affiliated with hospitals and integrated delivery systems, but efforts to date have not adequately reached physicians practicing solo or in small practices in the community. The Massachusetts e-Health Collaborative (MAeHC; www.maehc.org) provides an important opportunity to study implementation of healthcare information technology innovations in a community setting. In 2007, the MAeHC will complete the implementation of commercially available electronic health records (EHRs) for 441 physicians in more than 200 office practices in three diverse communities in Massachusetts. In this group of small-to-medium sized office practices in both urban and rural regions of the State, we will: 1) identify the barriers to and facilitators of laboratory monitoring and timely follow-up of abnormal laboratory results, especially for elderly patients and clinical scenarios common to this population; 2) design, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of clinical decision support (point-of-care alerts) for laboratory monitoring in a widely used, commercially available EHR; 3) design, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a results management system to improve the timely follow-up of abnormal laboratory test results in office practice; 4) develop a practical dissemination guide to assist other practices and communities interested in implementing similar interventions. The results of this study will be important because they will demonstrate and accelerate the dissemination of clinicians' use of healthcare information technology to improve patient safety and healthcare quality beyond integrated delivery systems and should be broadly generalizable to small- and medium-sized office practices in community settings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130
        • VA Boston Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving care from clinicians at primary care and adult internal medicine specialty practices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual care
Experimental: Laboratory Monitoring
laboratory monitoring alerts
Experimental: Result management
Result management module
Experimental: Both interventions
Both laboratory monitoring and result management interventions
laboratory monitoring alerts
Result management module

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Laboratory Monitoring
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Result management
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven R Simon, MD, VA Boston Healthcare System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 20, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R18HS017201-01 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on laboratory monitoring alerts

3
Subscribe