Safety and Equivalence of a Terconazole Vaginal Suppository (Test Product) Compared to the Reference Terconazole Vaginal Suppository in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

October 8, 2021 updated by: Padagis LLC

A Multi-center, Randomized, Investigator-blinded, Parallel-group Study, Designed to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Equivalence of Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg (Test Product) and Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg (Reference Product) in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Caused by Candida Species

The objectives of this study were to demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy of Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg(Test Product) and Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg(Reference Product) in the treatment of subjects with vulvovaginal candidiasis in order to establish bioequivalence.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

572

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female at least 18 years of age
  • Presented with symptomatic vulvovaginitis consistent with a diagnosis of moniliasis
  • Willing and able to read and sign an IRB approved ICF, which included agreement to comply with all study requirements as indicated in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of hypersensitivity or allergy to imidazoles
  • Female who was pregnant or lactating
  • Was menstruating or expected the onset of menses during the treatment days
  • Had evidence of any bacterial, viral or protozoal infection
  • Had a history of alcoholism, drug abuse, or problems that would likely have made the subject unreliable for the study
  • Had any condition or used any medication that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might have interfered with the conduct or results of the study or placed the prospective subject at increased risk
  • Had participated in any investigational study within 30 days prior to study enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test Product
Terconazole Vaginal Suppository
Vaginal Suppository inserted intravaginally once daily before bedtime for 3 consecutive days
Active Comparator: Reference Product
Terazol Vaginal Suppository
Vaginal Suppository inserted intravaginally once daily before bedtime for 3 consecutive days
Other Names:
  • Terazol 3 suppository

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects in Each Treatment Group With Therapeutic Cure
Time Frame: Visit 3: Day 22-31
The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of subjects in each treatment group with a therapeutic cure at the Test-of-Cure visit (Visit 3). A subject was considered a therapeutic cure if the subject was a clinical cure with mycological cure.
Visit 3: Day 22-31

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects With Mycological Cure
Time Frame: Visit 3: Day 22-31
Mycological cure was defined as a negative mycological culture (no growth) for Candida albicans or other relevant baseline yeast organism.
Visit 3: Day 22-31
Proportion of Subjects With Clinical Cure
Time Frame: Visit 3: Day 22-31

A subject was considered a clinical cure if all of the following were satisfied:

  1. All signs and symptoms with a score of 1 (mild) or 2 (moderate) at the Screening/Baseline visit were absent (score = 0), and all signs or symptoms with a score of 3 (severe) at Screening/Baseline had a score of 0 or 1.
  2. Total signs and symptoms did not worsen at any time following completion of the study treatment.
  3. Any new sign or symptom observed during the study period was determined by the Investigator not to be related to VVC.
  4. The subject did not require additional vulvovaginal or systemic antifungal therapy at any time during the study period.
  5. The subject did not use any topical drug therapy other than the study medication for the treatment of vulvovaginal irritation and/or pruritus such as topical analgesic or corticosteroid products
Visit 3: Day 22-31

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe