- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00803738
Safety and Equivalence of a Terconazole Vaginal Suppository (Test Product) Compared to the Reference Terconazole Vaginal Suppository in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis
October 8, 2021 updated by: Padagis LLC
A Multi-center, Randomized, Investigator-blinded, Parallel-group Study, Designed to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Equivalence of Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg (Test Product) and Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg (Reference Product) in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Caused by Candida Species
The objectives of this study were to demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy of Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg(Test Product) and Terconazole Vaginal Suppositories, 80 mg(Reference Product) in the treatment of subjects with vulvovaginal candidiasis in order to establish bioequivalence.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
572
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female at least 18 years of age
- Presented with symptomatic vulvovaginitis consistent with a diagnosis of moniliasis
- Willing and able to read and sign an IRB approved ICF, which included agreement to comply with all study requirements as indicated in the protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of hypersensitivity or allergy to imidazoles
- Female who was pregnant or lactating
- Was menstruating or expected the onset of menses during the treatment days
- Had evidence of any bacterial, viral or protozoal infection
- Had a history of alcoholism, drug abuse, or problems that would likely have made the subject unreliable for the study
- Had any condition or used any medication that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might have interfered with the conduct or results of the study or placed the prospective subject at increased risk
- Had participated in any investigational study within 30 days prior to study enrollment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Test Product
Terconazole Vaginal Suppository
|
Vaginal Suppository inserted intravaginally once daily before bedtime for 3 consecutive days
|
|
Active Comparator: Reference Product
Terazol Vaginal Suppository
|
Vaginal Suppository inserted intravaginally once daily before bedtime for 3 consecutive days
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects in Each Treatment Group With Therapeutic Cure
Time Frame: Visit 3: Day 22-31
|
The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of subjects in each treatment group with a therapeutic cure at the Test-of-Cure visit (Visit 3).
A subject was considered a therapeutic cure if the subject was a clinical cure with mycological cure.
|
Visit 3: Day 22-31
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Mycological Cure
Time Frame: Visit 3: Day 22-31
|
Mycological cure was defined as a negative mycological culture (no growth) for Candida albicans or other relevant baseline yeast organism.
|
Visit 3: Day 22-31
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Clinical Cure
Time Frame: Visit 3: Day 22-31
|
A subject was considered a clinical cure if all of the following were satisfied:
|
Visit 3: Day 22-31
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2002
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2003
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2003
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 5, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
December 8, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 13, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 8, 2021
Last Verified
October 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CPL-202
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.