Efficacy Study of Rapid Test to Prevent Hospital Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)

June 14, 2010 updated by: Erasme University Hospital

Two-Center Intervention Study to Evaluate the Impact of Rapid Molecular Screening on Nosocomial Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a novel PCR-based laboratory test for rapid detection of MRSA carriers to prevent transmission of MRSA in the Belgian acute care hospital setting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains have become endemic pathogens in acute and chronic healthcare facilities in Belgium. MRSA infection is causing increased public concern as it carries a significant risk of morbidity, mortality and has been linked to substantial excess healthcare costs.

Efficient control of MRSA transmission within healthcare facilities critically depends on screening for and isolation of MRSA carriers among admitted patients. Active surveillance cultures for MRSA are now part of clinical practice recommendations both in Europe and the USA. Indeed, studies have indicated that up to 70 % of the patient reservoir for MRSA among hospitalized patients can only be detected by active sampling of muco-cutaneous colonization sites. There is an urgent public health need for early and reliable detection of carriers of MRSA among patients admitted to healthcare facilities, to inform patient isolation and decontamination procedures, and thereby more effectively control cross-infection

The general objectives of this intervention study to be conducted in two large Belgian hospitals are to measure the impact of rapid (< 3 h) PCR detection of MRSA carriage upon patient admission on shortening the delay to implement contact isolation precautions for carriers and reducing nosocomial MRSA transmission to patients admitted in the same wards.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

7400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brugge, Belgium, B-8000
        • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan AV
      • Brussels, Belgium, B-1070
        • ULB Hôpital Erasme

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted for more than 48h to a ward in which evaluation in the previous baseline period met the following:

    • > 80 % compliance with admission and discharge conventional culture screening, for the pooled admissions to all study wards;
    • > 80 % compliance with additional MRSA contact isolation procedures, based on a sample of 50 patient care contact observations per hospital in all study wards;
    • pooled incidence of nosocomial MRSA acquisition ≥ 1.5 new cases /100 at risk admissions in the study wards.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients staying 48h or less in the study wards

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rapid PCR screen
Rapid PCR screen test for detection of MRSA carriers upon hospital admission
In the rapid test intervention arm, all patients admitted to study wards will be sampled within 24 h after admission. To ensure comparison of like with like, sample taking will include: (1) a swab from the anterior nares for PCR testing according to the test manufacturer's instructions; (2) the swab of anterior nares, and swabs from throat, perineum and of any wounds, bladder catheter or intravenous catheter exit site will be processed by conventional testing.
Other Names:
  • GeneXpert MRSA, Cepheid.
  • Real-time PCR assay for MRSA
Active Comparator: Conventional culture
Conventional culture screen for detection of MRSA carriers upon hospital admission
In the rapid test intervention arm, all patients admitted to study wards will be sampled within 24 h after admission. To ensure comparison of like with like, sample taking will include: (1) a swab from the anterior nares for PCR testing according to the test manufacturer's instructions; (2) the swab of anterior nares, and swabs from throat, perineum and of any wounds, bladder catheter or intravenous catheter exit site will be processed by conventional testing.
Other Names:
  • GeneXpert MRSA, Cepheid.
  • Real-time PCR assay for MRSA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine if a ≥ 50 % reduction of incidence of nosocomial MRSA acquisition can be observed after replacing culture by PCR for universal MRSA screening of patients upon admission to high incidence units in two acute care hospitals
Time Frame: 5-10 months
5-10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Median time required for detection of MRSA carriage after admission
Time Frame: 5-10 months
5-10 months
Median time required for starting isolation of MRSA carriers
Time Frame: 5-10 months
5-10 months
Number of patient-days of MRSA carrier stay in non-isolated conditions
Time Frame: 5-10 months
5-10 months
MRSA nosocomial infection rate
Time Frame: 5-10 months
5-10 months
MRSA cross-transmission rate
Time Frame: 5-10 months
5-10 months
Sensitivity and specificity of PCR vs conventional MRSA screening by culture
Time Frame: 10 months
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc J Struelens, MD, PhD, Erasme University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2010

Last Verified

June 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Staphylococcus Aureus

Clinical Trials on Rapid MRSA PCR test for screening carriers

3
Subscribe