An Investigation of the Safety of 4 Different Doses of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells as Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence

August 25, 2023 updated by: Cook MyoSite

Muscle Cell Mediated Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Investigation of the Safety of 4 Different Doses of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells.

This is a clinical investigation approved by US FDA and Canadian Health Authority to study the safety and potential effectiveness of the autologous muscle cells for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Wm Beaumont Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has SUI with normal detrusor activity confirmed with urodynamics
  • Patient has bladder capacity >200 mL
  • Patient's incontinence has not shown any improvement for at least -6 months
  • Patient has failed prior treatments (e.g., behavior modification, bladder exercises, biofeedback, electrical stimulation, bulking injections, urethral suspensions and/or drug therapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has known vesicoureteral reflux, vaginal prolapse beyond the introitus, or other significant pelvic floor abnormalities with high pressure instability
  • Patient has a neuromuscular disorder (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis)
  • Patient has uncontrolled diabetes
  • Patient is pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Patient is morbidly obese (defined as 100 pounds over their ideal body weight, or BMI ≥40) and would not be expected to benefit from treatment
  • Patient has current or acute conditions involving cystitis or urethritis
  • Patient is scheduled to receive radiation treatment to the vicinity
  • Patients with a history of radiation treatment to the urethra or adjacent structures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1
Transurethral dose escalation
Injection of autologous muscle cells
Other: 2
Periurethral dose escalation
Injection of autologous muscle cells

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants That Experienced Biopsy Procedure-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: at biopsy or between biopsy and treatment

Biopsy was required to generate AMDC products. Biopsy procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the biopsy procedure or injury at the biopsy site. Since biopsy occurred prior to AMDC treatment, results are presented independent of AMDC dose received.

All biopsy procedure-related events either self-resolved or were easily treated.

at biopsy or between biopsy and treatment
Biopsy Procedure-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: at biopsy or between biopsy and treatment

Biopsy was required to generate AMDC products. Biopsy procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the biopsy procedure or injury at the biopsy site. Since biopsy occurred prior to AMDC treatment, results are presented independent of AMDC dose received.

All biopsy procedure-related events either self-resolved or were easily treated.

at biopsy or between biopsy and treatment
Number of Participants That Experienced Injection Procedure-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 30 days

AMDC treatment was administered via intrasphincteric injection. Injection procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the injection procedure or genitourinary events occurring within 30 days of the injection procedure that could be attributed to cystoscopy or catheterization. Since these events could be attributed to the injection procedure, results are considered independent of AMDC dose received.

All injection procedure-related events self-resolved or were easily treated.

30 days
Injection Procedure-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 30 days

AMDC treatment was administered via intrasphincteric injection. Injection procedure-related events were defined as systemic responses to the injection procedure or genitourinary events occurring within 30 days of the injection procedure that could be attributed to cystoscopy or catheterization. Since these events could be attributed to the injection procedure, results are considered independent of AMDC dose received.

All injection procedure-related events self-resolved or were easily treated.

30 days
Number of Participants That Experienced AMDC Product-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months

If an immune response after injection or any urinary retention occurred and seemed suspicious, the physicians were consulted to determine whether the effect was likely related to the AMDC product.

No adverse events reported during the study were adjudicated as AMDC product-related.

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth Peters, MD, William Beaumont Hospitals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

February 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe