Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding

March 17, 2009 updated by: National Science Council, Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that the combination of endoscopic therapy with vasoconstrictor is better than either vasoconstrictor or endoscopic therapy alone in achieving the successful hemostatsis of acute variceal bleeding. The rationale of using vasoconstrictor is to enhance the efficacy of hemostasis by endoscopic therapy. Nowadays, endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has replaced endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) as the endoscopic treatment of choice in the arresting of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. EVL alone can achieve hemotasis up to 97% even in cases of active variceal hemorrhage. However, early rebleeding due to ligation-induced ulcer may be encountered. It appears that prevention of esophageal ulcers and bleeding by a proton pump inhibitor may be more logical than using a vasoconstrictor after cessation of bleeding by EVL.

Thus, the investigators designed a controlled trial to compare the initial hemostasis, early rebleeding rate in cirrhotic patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding receiving either emergency EVL plus vasoconstrictor infusion or losec infusion for 5 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methods of treatment:

Group 1: Somatostatin 250μg slow bolus IV infusion followed by 250μg per hour (6mg/ 24 hours) or Terlipressin 2mg bolus was instituted on enrollment followed by 1mg per 6 hours for 5 days. The use of either somatostatin or glypressin was at the discretion of doctors in charge. Group 2: Pantoloc 20 mg intravenously per day was instituted on enrollment and continued for 5 days.

Definition of initial hemostasis:

Initial hemostasis was defined as achieving a 24h bleeding-free period within the first 48h after treatment together with stable vital signs based on Baveno consensus criteria.

Very early rebleeding was defined as: UGI bleeding occurred after initial hemostasis and within 5 days after enrollment. UGI bleeding was proven to be from esophageal varices.

Treatment failure is defined as failure to control acute bleeding episodes or very early rebleeding.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The etiology of portal hypertension is cirrhosis.
  2. Age ranges between 18-80 y/o.
  3. Patients presenting with acute esophageal variceal bleeding proven by emergency endoscopy within 12 hours. (Acute esophageal variceal bleeding was defined as:

    • when blood was directly seen by endoscopy to issue from an esophageal varix (active bleeding) OR
    • when patients presented with red color signs on their esophageal varices with blood in esophagus or stomach and no other potential site of bleeding identified (inactive bleeding).
  4. EVL is performed after confirmation of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Enrollment time: Immediately after EVL is completed and variceal bleeding is arrested.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. association with severe systemic illness, such as sepsis, COPD, uremia
  2. association with gastric variceal bleeding
  3. failure in the control of bleeding by emergency EVL
  4. moribund patients, died within 12 hours of enrollment
  5. Uncooperative
  6. Ever received EIS, EVL within one month prior to index bleeding
  7. Child-Pugh's scores > 10

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm A
add pantoloc to reduce ulcer bleeding after banding ligation
Pantoloc infusion (1 vial q.d.); Using pantoloc to reduce rebleed after EVL
Other Names:
  • proton pump inhibitor
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Arm B: ligation + terlipressin 1mg q6h
Arm B, intervention: ligation + terlipressin 1mg q6h
Ligation plus terlipressin 1mg q6h
Other Names:
  • vasoconstrictor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
very early rebleeding
Time Frame: 5 days
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
mortality, complications
Time Frame: 42 days
42 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 18, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2009

Last Verified

March 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding

Clinical Trials on pantoloc (proton pump inhibitor)

3
Subscribe