Evaluation of the Additional Efficacy, and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil 20mg / Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg in the Treatment of Chinese Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

September 28, 2010 updated by: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Additional Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil 20mg / Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg in the Treatment of Chinese Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension, Who Fail to Attain the Blood Pressure Goals With Olmesartan Medoxomil 20mg Monotherapy

This study is designed to evaluate the additional efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, who fail to attain the blood pressure goals with olmesartan medoxomil monotherapy

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

304

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
      • Chengdu, China
      • Chongqing, China
      • Guang Zhou, China
      • Hang Zhou, China
      • Nanjing, China
      • Shanghai, China
      • Wuhan, China

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At Visit 3, mean seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) ≥ 95 mmHg and < 110 mmHg, AND mean seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) ≥140 mmHg and < 180 mmHg
  • At Visit 4, mean SeDBP ≥ 90 mmH
  • No significant disorder in blood, kidney, liver, cardiovascular system or endocrinology system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known or suspect secondary hypertension
  • Unstable angina
  • History of acute myocardial infarct, or PTCA or surgical cardiac procedures 3 months before entry into this study
  • Prior or current congestive heart failure (NYHA grade III or IV), hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, valvular disease or rheumatic heart disease
  • Arrhythmia of clinical significance
  • Bilateral renal artery stenosis, isolated renal artery stenosis, post kidney transplantation
  • Acute glomerular nephritis
  • Gout sufferers, even with the normal serum uric acid at entry
  • Retinal hemorrhage /exudate
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Hypovolemia
  • Patients with autoimmune disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide
olmesartan medoxomil 20mg oral tablets, once daily for 4 weeks then olmesartan medoxomil 20mg oral tablets + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg oral tablets, once daily for up to 8 weeks
Active Comparator: 2
olmesartan medoxomil
olmesartan medoxomil 20mg oral tablets, once daily for 4 weeks then olmesartan medoxomil 40mg oral tablets, once daily for up to 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean change of trough seated diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 12 between the two treatment groups.
Time Frame: Baseline to12 weeks
Baseline to12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The mean change of trough seated systolic blood pressure from Week 5 to Week 12 between the two treatment groups
Time Frame: 8 weeks (week 5 to week 12)
8 weeks (week 5 to week 12)
The mean change of trough seated diastolic blood pressure and seated systolic blood pressure from Week 5 to Week 9 between the two treatment groups
Time Frame: 5 weeks (Week 5 to week 9)
5 weeks (Week 5 to week 9)
The response rate in the two treatment groups from baseline to Week 9
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 weeks
Baseline to 9 weeks
The response rate in the two treatment groups from baseline to Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Baseline to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Naotaka Ikegami, VP, Shanghai Sankyo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2010

Last Verified

September 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe