Acupuncture in Herpes Zoster Neuralgia (ACUZoster) (ACUZoster)

August 9, 2018 updated by: Dominik Irnich

Analgetic Effectiveness of Acupuncture When Compared to a Standardised Analgesic Regimen in the Treatment of Herpes Zoster Neuralgia

Symptoms that herald herpes zoster include pruritus, dysesthesia and pain along the distribution of the involved dermatome. The most distressing symptom is typically pain and the most feared complication is postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), the persistence of pain long after rash healing. PHN is defined as pain persisting more than 3 months after the rash has healed. Both, the acute pain associated with herpes zoster and the chronic pain of PHN, have multiple adverse effects on health-related quality of life.

The primary objective of the trial presented is to investigate whether a 4 week semi-standardised acupuncture is non-inferior (first step) or superior (second step) to (a) the anticonvulsive drug gabapentin and (b) sham laser acupuncture in the treatment of pain associated with herpes zoster in addition to standardised analgesics. Secondary objectives include an assessment of the change of sensoric function, of long-term effectiveness, the occurrence of PHN and an evaluation of several pain specific questionnaires

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 80336
        • Multidisciplinary Pain Unit, University of Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of acute HZ
  • Pain intensity > 30 mm visual analog scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or other diseases influencing the peripheral sensibility (e.g., polyneuropathia, chronic pain syndromes, cutaneous irritations i.e. burns)
  • Patients under age
  • Uncompliance
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Surgery within the last 3 month
  • Severe heart/lung/kidney disease
  • Diseases influencing the quality of life
  • Psychiatric diseases (e.g., depression, schizophrenia, dementia)
  • Chronic intake of analgesics, neuroleptics, antidepressants, corticoids, alpha-agonists
  • Acupuncture, transdermal electric neurostimulation or other Complementary and Alternative Medicine treatment within the last 4 weeks
  • Contraindications according to the summary of product informations against analgesic treatment (i.e., metamizol, paracetamol, tramadol, morphine) or the investigational medicinal products (gabapentine, acupuncture needles)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham-laser acupuncture
Sham laser acupuncture (c) is applied at equivalent points as needle acupuncture. Laser irradiation is faked.
Laser irradiation is faked, approaching a non-functioning laser pen.
Active Comparator: gabapentine
standard analgesic treatment
Patients in this arm are treated individually with gabapentine 900 mg/d - 3600 mg/d, according to the recommended scheme given by the manufacturer
Active Comparator: Acupuncture
Acupuncture treatment is semi-standardized, i.e. beside a scheme of basic points, individual points can be chosen according to the TCM diagnostic pattern.
The needle acupuncture technique used in this trial is performed according the traditional way (TCM) using expendable needles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Alteration of pain intensity after treatment
Time Frame: 5 weeks
5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quantitative sensory testing
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe