The Value of Traction in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy

January 11, 2013 updated by: Julie Fritz, Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

The Value of Traction in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of adding mechanical traction to standard physical therapy treatments for patients with low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite the opinions of clinical experts that patients who might benefit from traction may represent distinct sub-groups of patients, most studies have not attempted to narrow their inclusion criteria beyond loose definitions of 'acute' or 'chronic' symptoms. While these studies seem to indicate that traction interventions will be of little benefit when administered to large groups of patients without a prior attempt to select which patients are most likely to benefit, they are not sufficient to preclude the possibility that a subgroup of patients may benefit substantially from the intervention. Recent preliminary studies suggest a there exists a subgroup of patients with LBP that is likely to benefit from traction.

The two primary aims of this study are:

  1. Determine the validity of the previously-identified prediction criteria to identify patients highly likely to benefit from the addition of traction to a standard physical therapy intervention.
  2. Compare the overall effectiveness of addition of a traction component to a standard physical therapy intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84119
        • Intermountain Healthcare, Rehab Agency

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chief complaint of pain and/or paresthesia in the lumbar spine with a distribution of symptoms that has extended distal to the gluteal fold on at least one lower extremity within the past 24 hours based on the patient's self-report.
  • Oswestry disability score of at least 20%
  • Age at least 18 years and less than 60 years
  • At least one of the following signs of nerve root compression:

    1. Positive ipsilateral or contralateral straight leg raise test (reproduction of leg symptoms with straight leg raise < 70 degrees)
    2. Sensory deficit to pinprick on the ipsilateral lower extremity
    3. Diminished strength of a myotome (hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, great toe extension, or ankle eversion) of the ipsilateral lower extremity
    4. Diminished lower extremity reflex (Quadriceps or Achilles) of the symptomatic lower extremity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Red flags noted in the patient's general medical screening questionnaire (i.e., tumor, metabolic diseases, RA, osteoporosis, spinal compression fracture, prolonged history of steroid use, etc.)
  • Evidence of central nervous system involvement, to include symptoms of cauda equina syndrome (i.e., loss of bowel/bladder control or saddle region paresthesia) or the presence of pathological reflexes (i.e., positive Babinski)
  • Patient reports the complete absence of low back and leg symptoms when seated
  • Recent surgery (< 6 months) to the lumbar spine or buttocks, or any fusion surgery of the lumbar spine or pelvis
  • Recent (< 2 weeks) epidural steroid injection for low back and/or leg pain
  • Current pregnancy
  • Inability to comply with the treatment schedule

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Extension oriented treatment approach
Extension exercises. Subjects are instructed in a progression of extension oriented movements for the lumbar spine. Manual therapy may be added to further increase extension movement and/or reduction of symptoms.
Extension oriented exercises. Subjects will be instructed in a progression of extension oriented exercises for the lumbar spine
Other Names:
  • McKenzie exercises
  • Directional preference
  • Specific exercise
Mechanical lumbar traction will be applied with subjects in prone utilizing 40-60% of subject's body weight to create a distraction force in the lumbar spine. Following traction, subjects will be instructed in a progression of extension oriented exercises and manual therapy to increase extension as described for the comparator group.
Other Names:
  • Saunders 3D Active Trac
Experimental: Mechanical traction plus extension-oriented treatment
Mechanical lumbar traction will be utilized in addition to extension oriented exercises. Subjects are also instructed in a progression of extension oriented movements for the lumbar spine. Manual therapy may be added to increase extension movement and/or reduce radicular symptoms.
Extension oriented exercises. Subjects will be instructed in a progression of extension oriented exercises for the lumbar spine
Other Names:
  • McKenzie exercises
  • Directional preference
  • Specific exercise
Mechanical lumbar traction will be applied with subjects in prone utilizing 40-60% of subject's body weight to create a distraction force in the lumbar spine. Following traction, subjects will be instructed in a progression of extension oriented exercises and manual therapy to increase extension as described for the comparator group.
Other Names:
  • Saunders 3D Active Trac

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1year
Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie M Fritz, PhD, Intermountain Healthcare; University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Physical therapy rehabilitation

3
Subscribe