Effects of Virtual Reality Versus Motor Imagery Versus Routine Physical Therapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

June 14, 2021 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Virtual Reality Versus Motor Imagery Versus Routine Physical Therapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of VR and MI techniques in addition to routine physical therapy on motor skills, balance and ADL in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease is one of the most common, insidious neurological disorders with major motor symptoms, including bradykinesia, resting tremors, rigidity, and postural disorders. Virtual reality and motor imagery are among the more innovative techniques for rehabilitation of patients with Parkinson's disease that promote motor learning through both explicit and implicit processes.This study is unique in that it examines the effects of VR versus MI on motor skills, balance, and daily living activities in individuals with Parkinson's disease

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan, 3800
        • Ripah International University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale(H&Y stages I to III)
  • Between the ages of 50 and 80 years of both genders
  • Independent in transfers
  • A score equal to or greater than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and
  • Previous lack of participation in balance or motor training.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any neurological conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy other than Parkinson's disease,
  • History of orthopedic issues such as pain, fracture, or lower limb pathology,
  • History of visual abnormalities,
  • History of any chronic or cardiovascular pathology that can interfere with the transfer procedure or can affect the training sessions,
  • The participants having severe dyskinesia or "on-off" phases,
  • Previous history of surgery for PD,
  • History of virtual games used for treatment in the past three months, and
  • Virtual game phobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Virtual Reality with Routine Physical Therapy
The duration of the VR will be from 10 to 15 minutes during each session and Routine Physical Therapy for 40 minutes which consists of warming-up, stretching, strengthening and active exercises for relaxation, coordination exercises for limbs, trunk, neck, and gait training)
VR group will be treated with virtual reality for 15 to 20 minutes along with routine physical therapy for 40 minutes session 3 days/week for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Rehabilitation following VR with Routine physical therapy treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Motor imagery technique with Routine Physical Therapy
Motor Imagery techniques will be given for 5 to 10 minutes along with routine physical therapy for 40 minutes which consists of warming-up, stretching, strengthening and active exercises for relaxation, coordination exercises for limbs, trunk, neck, and gait training)
MI group will be treated with virtual reality for 15 to 20 minutes along with routine physical therapy for 40 minutes session 3 days/week for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Rehabilitation following MI with Routine physical therapy treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Routine Physical Therapy
Only routine physical therapy will be given (including warming-up, stretching, strengthening and active exercises for relaxation, coordination exercises for limbs, trunk, neck, and gait training)
Group A will be given routine physical therapy in 40-min sessions and 20 min of walking and cycling with a short period of rest, every alternate day (3 days per week) for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Rehabilitation following Routine physical therapy treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Part II
Time Frame: 3 months
This is a subjective instrument that is widely used in clinical settings for patients with Parkinson's disease. This scale comprises 31 elements, which are divided into three sub-scales: Sub-scale II comprises the evaluation of activities in daily living. A possible maximum of 199 points can be scored on this scale. A score of 199 refers to complete disability and 0 refers to the absence of disability .
3 months
Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Part III
Time Frame: 3 months
This is a subjective instrument that is widely used in clinical settings for patients with Parkinson's disease. This scale comprises 31 elements, which are divided into three sub-scales and sub-scale III evaluates the motor system. A possible maximum of 199 points can be scored on this scale. A score of 199 refers to complete disability and 0 refers to the absence of disability
3 months
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 3 months
The scale has been established as the most widely used assessment tool in clinical settings to identify changes in balance performance. A score of less than 45 is considered a limit for the risk of falling, while a score of 56 relates to functional balance
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC):
Time Frame: 3 months
This scale is used as a predictor of falls in patients with neurological deficits. Patients are rated from 0% to 100%, with 0% interpreted as not at all safe and 100% as completely safe
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 12, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 12, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on VR with Routine physical therapy and Virtual reality

3
Subscribe