Customized Headrest or Standard Headrest in Holding Patients Still While Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

December 30, 2014 updated by: Cancer Trials Ireland

A Prospective Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial Investigating the Benefits of Patient-customised Headrests Versus Standard (Non-patient Specific) Headrests in the Immobilisation of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

RATIONALE: Using a customized headrest to hold patients in one position may help doctors plan treatment for patients with head and neck cancer. It is not yet known whether a customized headrest is more effective than a standard headrest in holding patients still during radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying a customized headrest to see how well it works compared with a standard headrest in holding patients still while undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To evaluate and compare the treatment set-up accuracy of customized vs standard headrest in immobilizing patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
  • To determine and compare patient comfort with the two immobilization techniques.

Secondary

  • To evaluate radiation therapists' satisfaction with the two immobilization techniques.
  • To examine and compare the cost effectiveness of the two immobilization techniques.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

  • Arm I: Patients are immobilized using the standard thermoplastic four-point fixation mask and the standard headrest system. Patients undergo 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy as per standard of care.
  • Arm II: Patients are immobilized using the standard thermoplastic four-point fixation mask and the customized headrest system. Patients undergo 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy as per standard of care.

Patients score their comfort using the Visual Analogue Scale during the course of radiotherapy. Radiation therapists complete an evaluation questionnaire for each treatment planning and procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dublin, Ireland, 6
        • Saint Luke's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed head and neck malignancy
  • Planning to undergo radical 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (using the Oncentra MasterPlan treatment planning system) at St Luke's Hospital

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • No evidence of any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that would make it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study
  • Able to comply with the study, in the opinion of the researcher and/or medical team

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
Immobilisation: Standard headrest plus individual customised mask (orfit)
Other: TRial Arm
Immobilisation: Customised headrest plus individual customised mask (orfit)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Treatment set-up accuracy
Time Frame: 2010
2010
Patient comfort with the two immobilization techniques as assessed by a patient-scored Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 2010
2010

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Radiation therapists' satisfaction as assessed by a questionnaire
Time Frame: 2010
2010
Cost-effectiveness as assessed by resource implications of the two immobilization techniques
Time Frame: 2010
2010

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Thirion, MD, Saint Luke's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 08-09 ICORG
  • ICORG-08-09
  • EU-20954

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe