Conventional Versus Point-of-care Based Coagulation Management

May 3, 2010 updated by: Goethe University

Conventional Versus Point-of-care Based Coagulation Management in Cardiac Surgery Patients Suffering From Increased Bleeding Tendency - a Prospective and Randomized Study

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of two different algorithms for coagulation management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery suffering from increased bleeding tendency. Algorithm 1 is based on conventional coagulation analyses (INR, aPTT, platelet count, fibrinogen concentration,...) and Algorithm 2 is based on thrombelastometry using the ROTEM-device and impedance aggregometry using the Multiplate device.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Essen, Germany, 45473
        • University Hospital Essen, Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
      • Frankfurt/Main, Germany, 60590
        • Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Clinic for Anaesthesiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years, combined surgical procedures (ACB & valve surgery), double valve surgery, aortic surgery, Re-Dos

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: POC algorithm
cardiac surgery patients suffering from increased perioperative bleeding and being treated following Point of Care based algorithm
Patients are randomized to receive either point-of-care based or conventional coagulation measurements based coagulation therapy in the case of increased perioperative bleeding tendency
Other Names:
  • ROTEM
  • Multiplate
  • Point-of-Care
Active Comparator: conventional algorithm
cardiac surgery patients suffering from increased perioperative bleeding and being treated following conventional coagulation management algorithm
Patients are randomized to receive either point-of-care based or conventional coagulation measurements based coagulation therapy in the case of increased perioperative bleeding tendency
Other Names:
  • ROTEM
  • Multiplate
  • Point-of-Care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
amount of transfused red blood cell concentrates
Time Frame: 24 h after begin of surgical intervention
24 h after begin of surgical intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
other transfused blood products including FFP, platelet concentrates and coagulation factor concentrates
Time Frame: 24h after surgical intervention
24h after surgical intervention
rate of rethoracotomy for bleeding
Time Frame: 24h after surgical intervention
24h after surgical intervention
ventilation time on ICU
Time Frame: till discharge from ICU
till discharge from ICU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian F Weber, Dr., Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2010

Last Verified

October 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe