Efficacy and Safety Study of Polidocanol Injectable Foam for the Treatment of Saphenofemoral Junction (SFJ) Incompetence (VANISH-1)

April 19, 2021 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

A Randomized, Blinded, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Polidocanol Injectable Foam 0.5%, 1.0%, or 2.0% Compared to Vehicle for the Treatment of Saphenofemoral Junction (SFJ) Incompetence

Varicose veins are enlarged, noticeably bulging veins, which commonly occur in the legs and may cause discomfort. In this study, patients with varicose veins in the legs will be participating. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of three different concentrations of an investigational drug, polidocanol injectable foam compared to vehicle (inactive solution) in treating the symptoms and appearance of varicose veins.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

279

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Laguna Hills, California, United States, 92653
      • San Diego, California, United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
    • Illinois
      • Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States, 60181
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49009
    • New York
      • Hartsdale, New York, United States, 10530
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
      • North Tonawanda, New York, United States, 14120
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 10530
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
    • Ohio
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43606
    • Oregon
      • Bend, Oregon, United States, 97701
    • Tennessee
      • Clarksville, Tennessee, United States, 37040
    • Washington
      • Kirkland, Washington, United States, 98034
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Incompetence of SFJ associated with incompetence of the GSV or other major accessory vein
  • Ability to comprehend and sign an informed consent document and complete study questionnaires in English
  • Ability to record symptoms in accordance with the protocol
  • Symptomatic varicose veins
  • Visible varicose veins

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who only have telangiectatic or reticular veins (Clinical Finding C1, as assessed by CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic) Classification of Venous Disorders).
  • Leg obesity impairing the ability to access the vein to be treated and/or to apply postprocedure compression bandaging and stockings
  • Ultrasonographic or other evidence of current or previous deep vein thrombosis or occlusion
  • Deep vein reflux unless clinically insignificant in comparison to superficial reflux
  • Peripheral arterial disease precluding the wearing of post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
  • Reduced mobility
  • Major surgery, prolonged hospitalization or pregnancy within 3 months of screening
  • Major co-existing disease (e.g. malignancy; pulmonary disease; renal or hepatic insufficiency; serious skin disease/condition that may compromise the ability of the patient to comply with the compression protocol, etc.)
  • Known allergic response to polidocanol or heparin, including history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and/or multiple allergic reactions
  • Current alcohol or drug abuse
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
  • History of DVT, pulmonary embolism or stroke

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Polidocanol injectable foam 0.125%
Injection of Polidocanol injectable foam
Experimental: Polidocanol injectable foam 0.5%
Injection of Polidocanol injectable foam
Experimental: Polidocanol injectable foam 1.0%
Injection of Polidocanol injectable foam
Experimental: Polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%
Injection of Polidocanol injectable foam
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
Injection of vehicle comparator
Placebo vehicle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient-reported Symptoms of Varicose Veins (VVSymQ Score)
Time Frame: Week 8

The 9 varicose vein symptoms were to be assessed and graded on a 6-point (i.e., 0-5) duration scale and an 11-point (i.e., 0-10) intensity scale, and the patient's level of activity for that day was to be assessed and graded on the 6-point (i.e., 0-5) duration scale. The 9 varicose vein symptoms assessed using the e-diary were derived from the first question of the modified Venous Insufficiency Epidemiologic and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) instrument. The VVSymQ is a subset of 5 VEINESQOL/ Sym items that have been determined in earlier studies to be most important to patients (heaviness, achiness, swelling, throbbing, and itching).

The daily VVSymQ score is the sum of the duration scores for these 5 symptoms (scores range from 0 to 25, with the lower end of the range being an indicator of less symptom intensity, and the higher end being an indicator of higher intensity).

At Visit 2/baseline, Week 8, scores were calculated

Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks in Appearance as Rated by Patient (PA-V3)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Patient Self-assessment of Visible Varicose Veins (PA-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used by patients to evaluate the appearance of their visible varicose veins. On this single-item paper questionnaire, the instructions included a diagram of the medial view of a leg with the area between the ankle and the groin circled. The patient was instructed to choose 1 of 5 response options that best described the appearance of the visible varicose veins of the leg that was treated in the study. The patient was instructed not to consider the appearance of the leg outside the circled area or of any spider veins. Possible responses ranged from "Not at all noticeable" (a score of 0) to "Extremely noticeable" (a score of 4).
8 weeks
Change From Baseline at 8 Weeks Post Treatment in IPR-V3 Score- Physician Photographic Review of Appearance
Time Frame: 8 weeks post treatment
The Independent Photography Review - Visible Varicose Veins (IPR-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used to assess the appearance of a patient's visible varicose veins. At baseline and Week 8, standardized digital photographs were taken of the medial view of the patient's target leg, from groin to ankle. An independent photography review panel, consisting of 3 trained, blinded clinicians evaluated the appearance of the patient's visible varicose veins using the IPR-V3 instrument's 5-point scale (where 0=none to 4=very severe visible varicose veins).
8 weeks post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varicose Veins

Clinical Trials on Polidocanol injectable foam (PEM)

3
Subscribe