Polypropylene Mesh Versus Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair

November 20, 2016 updated by: Francesco Saverio Mari, University of Roma La Sapienza

Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Infinit® PTFE Mesh, a Prospective Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Lichtenstein's hernioplasty using Infinit® PTFE Mesh, and to compare it with the traditional Lichtenstein procedure performed with polypropylene mesh.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy, 00189
        • UO Oneday-day Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 <65 years of age
  • Diagnosis of Unilateral inguinal hernia
  • Able to provide written consent
  • BMI < 35
  • ASA I-II patients
  • Non-complicated primary inguinal hernia performed in non-emergency setting and repaired with a Lichtenstein's hernioplasty
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent hernias
  • Incarcerated hernia
  • BMI > 35
  • ASA III-IV patients
  • Any condition preventing a correct evaluation of pain (non-cooperative patient, blind patient, drug addicted)
  • Hypersensitivity to any drug in study
  • Patients with an intra-operative findings of different pathology will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PTFE mesh
A Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is performed using PTFE mesh
A Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is performed using a PTFE mesh will be fixed by sutures in PTFE 2/0.
Active Comparator: polypropylene mesh
A Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is performed using polypropylene mesh
A Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is performed using a polypropylene mesh will be fixed by sutures in Polypropylene 2/0.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
post-hernioplasty acute pain
Time Frame: 24 hours
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
physical function
Time Frame: 24 hours
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
24 hours
postoperative acute discomfort
Time Frame: 24 hours
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
24 hours
wound infection
Time Frame: 7 days
to rate the wound infection risk.
7 days
postoperative complication
Time Frame: from 24 hours to 5 years
to monitor any other postoperative complication observed in the immediate, mid-term and long-term postoperative period.
from 24 hours to 5 years
recurrence
Time Frame: from 1 months to 5 years
to measure the recurrence
from 1 months to 5 years
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 14 days
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
14 days
post-hernioplasty acute pain
Time Frame: 72 hours
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
72 hours
post-hernioplasty acute pain
Time Frame: 7 days
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
7 days
post-hernioplasty acute pain
Time Frame: 14 days
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
14 days
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 1 months
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
1 months
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 3 months
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
3 months
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 6 months
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
6 months
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 1 year
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
1 year
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 2 years
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
2 years
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 3 years
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
3 years
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 4 years
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
4 years
post-hernioplasty chronic pain
Time Frame: 5 years
to measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
5 years
physical function
Time Frame: 72 hours
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
72 hours
physical function
Time Frame: 7 days
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
7 days
physical function
Time Frame: 14 days
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
14 days
physical function
Time Frame: 1 months
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
1 months
physical function
Time Frame: 3 months
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
3 months
physical function
Time Frame: 6 months
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
6 months
physical function
Time Frame: 1 year
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
1 year
physical function
Time Frame: 2 years
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
2 years
physical function
Time Frame: 3 years
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
3 years
physical function
Time Frame: 4 years
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
4 years
physical function
Time Frame: 5 years
to measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
5 years
postoperative acute discomfort
Time Frame: 72 hours
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
72 hours
postoperative acute discomfort
Time Frame: 14 days
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
14 days
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 1 months
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
1 months
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 3 months
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
3 months
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 6 months
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
6 months
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 1 year
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
1 year
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 2 years
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
2 years
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 3 years
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
3 years
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 4 years
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
4 years
postoperative chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 5 years
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
5 years
postoperative acute and chronic discomfort
Time Frame: 7 days
to measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
7 days
wound infection
Time Frame: 14 days
to rate the wound infection risk.
14 days
wound infection
Time Frame: 1 months
to rate the wound infection risk.
1 months
wound infection
Time Frame: 3 months
to rate the wound infection risk.
3 months
wound infection
Time Frame: 6 months
to rate the wound infection risk.
6 months
wound infection
Time Frame: 1 year
to rate the wound infection risk.
1 year
wound infection
Time Frame: 2 years
to rate the wound infection risk.
2 years
wound infection
Time Frame: 3 years
to rate the wound infection risk.
3 years
wound infection
Time Frame: 4 years
to rate the wound infection risk.
4 years
wound infection
Time Frame: 5 years
to rate the wound infection risk.
5 years
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 1 months
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
1 months
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 3 months
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
3 months
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 6 months
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
6 months
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 1 years
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
1 years
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 2 years
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
2 years
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 3 years
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
3 years
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 4 years
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
4 years
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: 5 years
to measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Luigi Masoni, Dr., Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Saverio Mari, Dr., Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
  • Study Director: Antonio Brescia, Prof., Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Giuseppe R Nigri, Dr., Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Favi, Dr, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Milillo, Dr., Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Infinit® PTFE mesh (WL Gore)

3
Subscribe