My Depression Wellness Toolkit Study

March 10, 2018 updated by: Zindel Segal, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Major depressive disorder (MDD) continues to have a profound impact on individuals, families, and the health care system. Despite marked success in treating active individual episodes of unipolar depression, our understanding of the neural and cognitive mechanisms involved in the return of symptoms remains extremely limited, and few interventions exist that specifically target factors involved in prophylaxis. The research being proposed is among the first that is designed to examine neurocognitive markers for depressive relapse vulnerability and link them directly to clinical prognosis.

Hypothesis 1: Cortical midline structures (CMS) network recruitment will be associated with behavioural and neural indices of a reflexive attentional bias towards dysphoric stimuli in a divided attention task.

Hypothesis 2: Behavioural and neural indices of dysphoric attentional bias following mood challenge will predict depression relapse in prospective 18-month follow up.

Hypothesis 3: Relative to CBT, Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) will normalize CMS and right insular/fronto-opercular cortices (INS-FO) network imbalance.

Hypothesis 4: Relative to CBT, MBCT will normalize to healthy control levels, behavioural and neural indices of dysphoric attentional bias, which will be predictive of reduced relapse risk across a 24 month follow up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Relapse and recurrence following recovery from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are common and debilitating outcomes that carry enormous social costs [1-3]. Our CIHR funded program of research has studied the nature of psychological vulnerability in affective disorder. We have recently identified the activation of a depressive cognitive mode triggered by temporary dysphoric states as a reliable risk marker for depressive relapse [4, see attached]. In parallel, functional imaging studies have increased our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying normative affective responses [5] and have begun to examine their dysregulation in affective disorder [6-8]. Our research has identified potential brain biomarkers that predict episode relapse in unipolar depression. However, it remains unknown how these potential biomarkers are related to dysphoria-triggered information processing modes that also predict relapse, and whether these neurocognitive vulnerabilities are amenable to intervention, resulting in more lasting prophylaxis. The present proposal employs a cognitive neuroscience approach to examine whether our previously identified neural markers of depression relapse and prophylaxis are associated with a dysphoric information processing mode. In particular, we will use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioural probes to undertake a finely tuned examination of mood linked biases in attention toward dysphoric stimulus events (i.e., sad faces) to link our previously identified neural markers with a specific information processing mode. Further, our preliminary data presented here demonstrate a correlation between these mood linked neural markers and relapse, but we cannot demonstrate that these markers are causally related to relapse or prophylaxis. To address this, we will examine whether these markers and associated dysphoric attentional biases are 1) modifiable via attentional training designed to overcome reflexive modes of thought and perception and 2) are predictive of relapse status across an 24-month prospective follow up of treated patients. This research will elucidate the neural and information processing correlates that may signal relapse risk in recovered depressed patients. This knowledge will increase our limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying enduring depressive relapse vulnerability as well as assess potentially efficient strategies for relapse prophylaxis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

166

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women or men 18-65 years of age
  • Meeting criteria for prior depression, currently in recovery or remission, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th eg; DSM-IV-TR, (American Psychiatric Association, 2000)
  • A baseline score of ≤ 12 on the HRSD (Hamilton, 1960)
  • Internet access
  • English proficiency at or above a grade 8 level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Schizophrenia or current psychosis
  • Organic mental disorder
  • Pervasive developmental delay (PDD)
  • Current substance dependence
  • Imminent suicide or homicide risk
  • Axis I or II disorder that necessitates primary treatment not provided in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy
Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy is a manualized, group skills training program (Segal et al., 2013) that is based on an integration of aspects of cognitive therapy for depression (Beck, 1979) with components of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Patients participate in 8 weekly sessions, each of which incorporates didactic and experiential learning, along with home practice of mindfulness skills taught in the program.
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, a manualized, group skills training program (Segal et al., 2013) that is based on an integration of aspects of cognitive therapy for depression (Beck, 1979) with components of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Patients participate in 8 weekly sessions, each of which incorporates didactic and experiential learning, along with home practice of skills taught in the program.
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
CBT is an evidence based depression-specific psychotherapy that examines the relationship between thinking styles and the perpetuation of mood symptoms in major depression. Patients use thought records and activity scheduling, among other tools, to record and reappraise their thinking during situations where negative affect is present, both in session and for homework.
CBT is an evidence based depression-specific psychotherapy that examines the relationship between thinking styles and the perpetuation of mood symptoms in major depression. Patients use thought records and activity scheduling, among other tools, to record and reappraise their thinking during situations where negative affect is present, both in session and for homework.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of relapse/recurrence based on CMS and INS/FO configuration.
Time Frame: 2 years
Patients who relapse will show Increased neural activation in CMS compared to INS/FO regions compared to non relapsers
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in CMS and INSFO network imbalance following MBCT compared to CBT
Time Frame: 2 years
Patients in MBCT will show greater levels of activation in INS/FO compared to patients in CBT
2 years
Changes in attentional processing of dysphoric stimuli between the groups
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Relapsers will show greater attention to negative self-descriptive adjectives compared to non-relapsers.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zindel V. Segal, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depression

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy

3
Subscribe