Coping Skills Training for Living With Chronic Low Back Pain

May 16, 2019 updated by: Dr Melissa Day, The University of Queensland

Mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Low Back Pain

Up to 80% of Australians experience back pain and 10% have significant disability as a result. There is a critical need for the development and evaluation of innovative treatments that have the capacity to target the multidimensional nature of chronic low back pain. This study will compare the effects and mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for chronic low back pain. Results will ultimately lead to streamlined interventions designed to efficiently maximise benefit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Up to 80% of Australians experience back pain and 10% have significant disability as a result. This translates into substantial economic cost with far reaching psychological, emotional and social implications. Unfortunately, the treatment options for chronic low back pain (CLBP) are limited and typical medical/pharmacological approaches entail potentially serious side-effects (e.g., opioid addiction). There is a critical need for the development and evaluation of innovative interventions that have the capacity to target the multidimensional nature of CLBP.

Research indicates that psychosocial interventions for CLBP are viable treatment approaches that entail few (if any) deleterious side effects and can have benefit beyond pain reduction. Cognitive Therapy (CT) and Mindfulness Meditation (MM) have both been found to be feasible and effective for CLBP. A promising recently developed treatment that combines aspects of CT and MM is Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT). MBCT has been successfully applied to problems such as depression and headache; however, this approach has not been investigated for CLBP.

Thus, the current study is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to examine the effects and mechanisms (i.e., how and for whom do these treatments work) of CT, MM, and MBCT for CLBP. Brain state data (electroencephalogram (EEG)) as well as self-report data will be examined to investigate the potential unique and shared mechanisms underlying treatment effects. Furthering the field's understanding of these treatments and their mechanisms will lead to the development of streamlined interventions designed to efficiently maximise benefit for individuals with CLBP, and that optimise relief from suffering.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4072
        • The University of Queensland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Chronic pain of the low back (≥3 months) that is the primary source of reported pain
  • Average pain intensity of ≥4 on a 10-point scale
  • If currently taking analgesic or psychotropic medications, they must have been stabilised for ≥4 weeks prior to this study
  • Be able to read, speak and understand English
  • Be able to attend a weekly 2-hour therapy session for 8 concurrent weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment, uncontrolled psychotic symptoms or current elevated suicidal ideation as this may interfere with group-delivered therapy (as evidenced by the 6-item screener)
  • Chronic pain due to malignancy
  • History of a medical condition that could produce an abnormal EEG and interfere with the tests of the effects of treatment on EEG (e.g., epilepsy, history of traumatic brain injury)
  • Currently receiving other psychosocial pain treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cognitive Therapy
Eight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered cognitive therapy.
Active Comparator: Mindfulness Meditation
Eight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered mindfulness meditation.
Active Comparator: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy
Eight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered mindfulness-based cognitive therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain interference PROMIS scale
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain interference is assessed via the PROMIS scale
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity assessed via the numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain intensity is assessed via the numerical rating scale (NRS)
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Pain catastrophizing assessed via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain catastrophizing is assessed via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Mindfulness assessed via the FFMQ
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in mindfulness is assessed via the FFMQ
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Pain acceptance assessed via the CPAQ
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain acceptance is assessed via the CPAQ
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Psychological functioning PROMIS scale
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in psychological functioning is assessed via the PROMIS scale
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Emotional functioning PROMIS scale
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in emotional functioning is assessed via the PROMIS scale
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Physical functioning PROMIS scale
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in physical functioning is assessed via the PROMIS scale
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands assessed via EEG
Time Frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in brain state data is assessed via EEG
pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melissa Day, MA(Clin), PhD, The University of Queensland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Meditation

3
Subscribe