Persistent Lyme Empiric Antibiotic Study Europe (PLEASE)

September 6, 2016 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Persistent Lyme Empiric Antibiotic Study Europe. A Prospective, Randomised Study Comparing Two Prolonged Oral Antibiotic Strategies After Initial Intravenous Ceftriaxone Therapy for Patients With Symptoms of Proven or Possible Persistent Lyme Disease

The purpose of the study is to establish whether prolonged antibiotic treatment of patients diagnosed with proven or presumed PLD (as endorsed by the international ILADS guidelines) leads to better patient outcome than short-term treatment as endorsed by the Dutch CBO guidelines.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

280

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6522 JV
        • Sint Maartenskliniek

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females who are 18 years or older.
  • Women of child-bearing potential must agree to use contraception methods other than oral contraceptives during the study therapy period, since failure of oral contraceptives due to long-term antibiotic use has been described and doxycycline might be teratogenic.
  • Patients with presumed or proven PLD. In this study, clinical suspicion of PLD is defined as complaints of musculoskeletal pain, arthritis or arthralgia, neuralgia or sensory disturbances (such as paresthesias or dysesthesias), neuropsychological or cognitive disorders, and persistent fatigue, that are:

    • temporally related to an episode of erythema migrans or otherwise proven symptomatic Lyme disease (defined as within 4 months after erythema migrans as assessed by a physician, or positive biopsy, PCR, culture, intrathecal B. burgdorferi antibodies), OR
    • accompanied by a positive B. burgdorferi IgG or IgM immunoblot (as defined by strict criteria in line with the European Union Concerted Action on Lyme Borreliosis (EUCALB)), regardless of prior ELISA IgG/IgM screening results.
  • Subjects must sign a written informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a known history of allergy or intolerance to tetracyclines, macrolides, hydroxychloroquine or ceftriaxone.
  • Subjects who have had more than 5 days of antimicrobial therapy with activity against B. burgdorferi within the previous 4 weeks.
  • Subjects with a presumed diagnosis of neuroborreliosis (CSF pleocytosis or intrathecal antibody production) for which intravenous antimicrobial therapy is required.
  • Subjects with a known diagnosis of HIV-seropositivity or other immune disorders. (No HIV serologic testing is required for the study).
  • Subjects with positive syphilis serology or signs of other spirochetal diseases.
  • Subjects with moderate or severe liver disease defined as alkaline phosphatase, ALAT, or ASAT greater than 3 times upper limit of normal.
  • Subjects who are receiving and cannot discontinue cisapride, astemizole, terfenadine, barbiturates, phenytoin, or carbamazepine (The concentrations of these drugs may increase during clarithromycin therapy and/or lead to reduced availability of doxycycline).
  • Subjects who are currently enrolled on other investigational drug trials or receiving investigational agents.
  • Subjects who have been previously randomized into this study.
  • Severe physical or psychiatric co-morbidity that interferes with participation in the study protocol, including previous medical diagnosis of rheumatic conditions, chronic fatigue syndrome or chronic pain conditions as well as insufficient command of the Dutch language.
  • Co-morbidity that could (partially) account for the symptoms of the subject (e.g. vitamin B12 deficiency, anemia, hypothyroidism).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
After open-label i.v. ceftriaxone 2000 mg qd via a peripheral i.v. catheter: 12 weeks' course of double placebo b.i.d.
Active Comparator: Doxycycline
After open-label i.v. ceftriaxone 2000 mg qd via a peripheral i.v. catheter: oral Doxycycline 100 mg combined with a placebo b.i.d. for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Doxycycline disper
  • CASnr 564-25-0 (doxycycline); 17086-28-1 (doxycycline monohydraat)
Active Comparator: Clarithromycin and hydroxychloroquine
After open-label i.v. ceftriaxone 2000 mg qd via a peripheral i.v. catheter: clarithromycin 500 mg combined with hydroxychloroquine 200 mg b.i.d. for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Clarithromycine Mylan, RVG 32619
  • CASnr 81103-11-9
  • Hydroxychloroquine; Plaquenil, RVG 00853
  • CASnr 118-42-3 (hydroxychloroquine); 737-36-4 (hydroxychloroquine sulfate)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global score 36-item Short-form General Health Survey (SF 36)
Time Frame: Week 14
Because different operationalizations of the term 'Global score 36-item Short-form General Health Survey (SF 36)' exist, the primary outcome measure is specified here as the 'physical component summary score' (PCS) of the RAND-36 Health Status Inventory (RAND SF-36, Hays 1998), which is similar to the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36). The PCS is also known as the physical health composite score (PHC). This specification has been communicated to the local Ethics Committee on March 1, 2011, and was approved on April 6, 2011.
Week 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subscales 36-item Short-form General Health Survey (SF 36)
Time Frame: weeks 0, 14, 26, 40 and 52
After the last comprehensive outcome assessment at week 40, patients are surveyed by post-study questionnaires at week 52 (protocol version 3.8; dated July 17, 2009; final Ethics Committee approval April 29, 2010).
weeks 0, 14, 26, 40 and 52
Actometer recording during 14 days (objective physical activity)
Time Frame: weeks 0, 14 and 40
weeks 0, 14 and 40
Measurements of neuropsychological impairment
Time Frame: weeks 0, 14, 26 and 40
weeks 0, 14, 26 and 40
Economic evaluation: Questionaire EQ-5D, health consumption and productivity of labour
Time Frame: weeks 0, 14, 26, 40 and 52
After the last comprehensive outcome assessment at week 40, patients are surveyed by post-study questionnaires at week 52 (protocol version 3.8; dated July 17, 2009; final Ethics Committee approval April 29, 2010).
weeks 0, 14, 26, 40 and 52
Fatigue subscale of Checklist Individual Strength (CIS)
Time Frame: weeks 0, 14, 26, 40 and 52
After the last comprehensive outcome assessment at week 40, patients are surveyed by post-study questionnaires at week 52 (protocol version 3.8; dated July 17, 2009; final Ethics Committee approval April 29, 2010).
weeks 0, 14, 26, 40 and 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bart-Jan Kullberg, Prof., M.D., Radboud University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lyme Disease

Clinical Trials on Doxycycline

3
Subscribe