Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP (e-ROP)

February 3, 2015 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The primary objective of this multi-center clinical study is to evaluate the validity, reliability, feasibility, safety and relative cost-effectiveness of a retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) telemedicine evaluation system to detect eyes of at-risk babies who meet referral warranted ROP (RW-ROP) criteria and therefore need a diagnostic evaluation by an ophthalmologist experienced in ROP.

We shall:

  1. Calculate the accuracy, using sensitivity and specificity, of the system to provide remote evaluations when compared with the findings of a "gold standard" indirect ophthalmoscopic examination performed by a Study-certified ophthalmologist, rigorously trained in ROP diagnostic examinations (validity);
  2. Determine intra-reader and inter-reader agreement for deciding whether digital images indicate that the eyes of a baby are in need of diagnostic indirect ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist experienced in ROP (reliability);
  3. Determine whether imaging evaluation can be achieved for each baby (feasibility);
  4. Examine ocular and systemic complications associated with digital imaging and compared with those associated with diagnostic examinations performed by an ophthalmologist (safety);
  5. Compare the costs and benefits of adopting a telemedicine retinal imaging system compared to the current cost of indirect ophthalmoscopic examinations (cost-effectiveness).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Eligibility Criteria:

• Babies with birth weights of <1251 grams(g) at selected large clinical centers in the US and Canada.

Procedures:

• Participants will undergo both digital retinal imaging and clinically indicated indirect ophthalmoscopic examinations on the same day. Wide-field digital images (WF-DI) of both eyes will be captured by non-physician Certified ROP Imagers (CRIs) using standardized imaging protocols. The RetCam Shuttle® (Clarity Medical Systems, Pleasanton, CA), a corneal-contact camera that captures wide field (130 degree field of view) retinal images, will be used.

Masking:

• Study-certified Ophthalmologist and Study-certified Imager at the clinical sites will be masked to each other's findings. The Study Clinical Coordinator (SCC) will remain unmasked. SCC will monitor the clinical noteworthy events and report all adverse events to the site Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Project Director at the Office of Study Chair, and to the Data Coordinating Center (DCC). DCC will prepare closed-session Data Monitoring and Oversight Committee (DMOC) reports. The PI at each site will monitor adverse events.

Outcome Measures:

• The primary outcome measure is detection of referral warranted ROP (RW-ROP) on digital images. Retinal images will be graded by Trained Readers using a standardized protocol to identify eyes with RW-ROP. Results of the gradings will be compared to the diagnostic examinations being performed on each child at the same session when images taken. For comparison, images will also be graded by ROP experts (Expert Readers).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

269

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4
        • University of Calgary
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University of Louisville
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Children's Hospital Boston
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas San Antonio
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 months to 9 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Babies with birth weighs of <1251g at selected large clinical centers in the US

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Babies with birth weighs of <1251g at selected large clinical centers in the US and Canada.
  • Admitted to a participating Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) and expected to survive to 28 days.
  • Likely to remain in participating NICU for serial ROP exams.
  • Transferred to participating NICU for treatment of ROP (regardless of PMA).
  • Parents or guardians have provided informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to obtain informed consent.
  • Known ocular anomalies that prevent imaging of the retina.
  • Life threatening anomalies (i.e. heart, neurological, etc).
  • Admission to participating NICU with ROP that is already regressing or treated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Detection of Referral Warranted ROP
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Retinopathy of Prematurity

3
Subscribe