Use of AEEG as Predictor of Long-term Motor Outcome in Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease

August 17, 2011 updated by: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
This study aims to examine performance on a neurological screening test, the Dubowitz, and sleep wake cycles on amplitude integrated electroencephalogram (AEEG) in neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD) as a way to potentially predict longterm motor outcome. It will compare the results of these studies to neonates without CHD.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

Neonates with congenital heart disease are at increased risk of adverse long term neurodevelopmental outcomes, including lower mean intelligent quotients (IQs). However, it is difficult to predict with neonates are most likely to be affected and a cost effective method is needed. AEEG has been used in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and abnormal sleep wake cycles have been proposed to predict poorer long term outcomes. We thus hypothesize that abnormal sleep wake cycles in neonates with congenital heart disease will correlate with poorer outcomes. In our study, we will examine the relationship between performance on a neurodevelopmental screening tool, the Dubowitz neonatal neurological screening tool, and the sleep wake cycles on AEEG both before and after cardiac repair to try and predict which neonates are at increased risk of adverse long term outcomes. We will also compare the findings of the AEEG and performance on the neurodevelopmental tool to the data gathered from neonates without cardiac disease.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Hospital Division of Newborn Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 2 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Anticipated, 65 newborns with congenital heart disease and 20 newborns without congenital heart disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborn with cardiac anomaly requiring surgical intervention or a newborn that is in NICU for at least 24 hours for monitoring
  • If newborn has congenital cardiac anomaly, cardiac repair must be performed at Mount Sinai Hospital
  • If newborn has congenital cardiac anomaly, he/she must be managed pre-operatively for at least 24 hours at Mount Sinai Hospital
  • If newborn has congenital cardiac anomaly, he/she must be managed post-operatively at Mount Sinai Hospital for at least 72 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns with previously known anomalies other than cardiac
  • Chromosomal abnormalities other than 22Q, that might have long-term neurodevelopmental implications
  • Diagnosis of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
  • Metabolic disorder
  • Other genetic disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Neonates with congenital heart disease
The case group will consist of newborns born between 32 and 41 weeks gestation diagnosed with a congenital cardiac anomaly requiring surgical repair during their hospitalization and managed in the Mount Sinai Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The control arm will include newborns born between 32 and 41 weeks without congenital cardiac anomalies. Both groups will undergo a neurological screening assessment and receive an AEEG to look at sleep wake cycles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Abnormal sleep wake cycles on AEEG
Time Frame: from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) which is on average about four weeks
from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) which is on average about four weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Performance on neurologic screening tools
Time Frame: from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
Head ultrasound abnormalities
Time Frame: from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
Seizures
Time Frame: from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
Death
Time Frame: from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
Inability to feed orally
Time Frame: from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
Respiratory support requirement
Time Frame: from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks
from 24 hours of life to time of discharge home from the neonatal intensive care unit which is on average about four weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ian Holzman, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2011

Last Verified

August 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Heart Disease

Subscribe